What's new

In Last Decade India has Iinked Defense Deals worth over $50 billion

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
In Last Decade India has Iinked Defense Deals worth over $50 billion

In the decade since the 1999 Kargil conflict, India has inked deals worth over $50 billion to acquire fighters, warships, tanks, missiles, other weapon systems and platforms, the overwhelming majority of them from abroad. That is not all. India is poised to spend well over $30 billion over the next four-five years to import military hardware and software, which will only serve to reinforce its position as the developing world's biggest arms buyer.

China, of course, spends much more -- its `declared' defence budget this year is $70 billion compared to India's $30 billion -- but it's difficult to do number-crunching about its military acquisitions, hiding as it does more than revealing. Pakistan, on its part, is not too far behind. It even pipped India, for instance, in 2006 by notching up arms import deals worth $5.1 billion, compared to India's $3.5 billion.

Disclosing the defence ministry's official figures on Thursday, top sources said India spent Rs 62,672 crore on `direct capital acquisitions' in the 1999-2004 timeframe. "This has more than doubled in the last five years (2004-2009) to Rs 1,37,496 crore. It becomes Rs 1,78,496 crore if one adds the Rs 41,000 crore earmarked for net capital expenditure this fiscal,'' said a source.

The scorching pace set can be gauged from the fact that the defence ministry inked as many as 465 arms contracts worth Rs 1,35,000 crore in just the last three years. Russia continues to lead the pack of defence suppliers to India, with annual sales worth around $1.5 billion, followed by Israel, which adds $1 billion or so to its kitty every year.

Then come others like France and UK. But it's actually the US which is now increasingly muscling into the lucrative Indian arms market, having already bagged the $2.1 billion contract for eight Boeing P-8I long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft and the $962 million deal for six C-130J Super Hercules planes.

There is, however, quite a bit of disquiet over whether India actually gets the biggest bang for its buck, given the lack of concrete long-term strategic planning to systematically build military capabilities in tune with the country's growing geo-political aspirations.

Nevertheless, the sharp upward trajectory in modernising the armed forces is considered imperative since India is the only country with long unresolved borders with two nuclear-armed, largely hostile neighbours. Then, of course, there is the deadly threat of unconventional warfare, as was underlined by the 26/11 terror attacks.

Big defence deals inked

* US: 6 C-130J Super Hercules aircraft for $962 million (2007); 8 Boeing P-8I planes for $2.1 billion (2009)

* Israel: 3 Phalcon AWACS for $1.1 billion (2004); Rs 10,075 crore project to jointly develop medium-range surface-to-air missile systems (2009)

* France: 6 Scorpene submarines in a Rs 18,798 crore project (2005)

* Russia: Admiral Gorshkov and 16 MiG-29Ks in $1.5 billion package deal (inked in 2004 but aircraft carrier's refit to zoom up to $2.5 billion now from original $974 million); 230 Sukhoi-30MKIs for $8.5 billion

* UK: 66 Hawk AJTs in a Rs 8,000 crore project (2004)

Big projects in offing

* Rs 42,000 crore project for 126 multi-role combat aircraft

* Rs 30,000 crore project for 6 new-generation submarines after Scorpenes

* Rs 20,000 crore artillery modernisation programme to acquire 1,580 towed guns, 814 mounted gun systems, 180 self-propelled wheeled guns, 100 self-propelled tracked guns and 140 air-mobile ultra-light howitzers

* Rs 20,000 crore for around 800 helicopters, ranging from VVIP and heavy-lift to attack and light utility

From:ASIAN DEFENCE: In Last Decade India has Iinked Defense Deals worth over $50 billion
 
.
endisans awwam ko yai aur 100 saal sarak par sleep:lazy: kara-e-gein!:hang2:
 
. .
Gee. I think the US should become closer friend with India to get more of the money that India is willing to spend.
 
.
All this equipment will take more then 3 to 5 years to reach and till then other regional powers like china and pakistan would have modified as compared to IA which is replacing obsolete russian weapons.
 
.
No Offense, but Pakistan needs to worry more about handling its internal issues / battles for next 5-10 years than countering Indian purchase of military Hardware. As far as China is concerned, its way ahead to be worried about indian aquisitions. In my opinion, its the other way round. India, worried about vast imbalance in the military capability between China and itself, is doing these aquisitions to make the capability gap somewhat smaller.

cheers

Karan
 
.
Karan how can u say 5-10years?
About countering indian purchases lol dude we dont compremise our NATIONAL SECURITY from a country that is hell bent on destroying us by supporting talibans and can go to war without declaring war
NOBODY CAN TRUST INDIA
 
.
Karan how can u say 5-10years?
About countering indian purchases lol dude we dont compremise our NATIONAL SECURITY from a country that is hell bent on destroying us by supporting talibans and can go to war without declaring war
NOBODY CAN TRUST INDIA

who makes up that group of nations that dont trust India.


1.Pakistan
2.????????
3.????????

And please dont say China, because if they did not trust us then the 50 billion dollar trade that exists, would not exist. sure they dont trust us completely but they have very different reasons for that.
 
.
The three decades before this one India hardly bought anything and hence most of the weapons are obsolete. Even our Pakistani friends does not say we have state of art weapons.
This should explain the spending in last decade.

The mordernization started after Kargil and it will take another 5 years before we see it's effect, right now we have not even finished ordering.
 
.
who makes up that group of nations that dont trust India.


1.Pakistan
2.????????
3.????????

And please dont say China, because if they did not trust us then the 50 billion dollar trade that exists, would not exist. sure they dont trust us completely but they have very different reasons for that.
Really according to you if trade is trust that ? if it is then PAKISTAN also has trust on India because of trade relations between us and you people.
The trust about which im talking is the one nobody(ur bordering countries) does on india:
Srilanka=?
Bengladesh=?
China=?
Pakistan=?
Nepal=?
Nobody trusts india : ACCEPT REALITY.
 
.
Really according to you if trade is trust that ? if it is then PAKISTAN also has trust on India because of trade relations between us and you people.
The trust about which im talking is the one nobody(ur bordering countries) does on india:
Srilanka=?
Bengladesh=?
China=?
Pakistan=?
Nepal=?
Nobody trusts india : ACCEPT REALITY.

see that's the illusion you have crafted for your self.

There are so many ways to dis prove you i am going to take my time to do so one by one.

Sri lanka

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/42990-sri-lanka-india-power-link-ready.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/42988-india-china-boost-sri-lanka-railways.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/40143-india-share-its-nuclear-technology-sri-lanka.html

Not to mention all the Military assistance India Gives Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka's troops got training in India
The country's flagship was obtained from India

Bengladesh

http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangladesh-defence/39974-india-bangladesh-ink-power-exchange-deal.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/40357-bangladesh-nabs-anti-india-group-nlfts-chief.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangladesh-defence/40781-bangladesh-buy-500-mw-power-india-2012-a.html

China

http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/36251-china-praises-indias-decision-end-trade-probe.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/42402-krishna-says-optimistic-about-future-india-china-ties.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/40138-india-china-well-path-strengthening-ties-yan.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/31309-india-china-grow-closer.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/2972-energy-needs-bring-india-china-closer.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/40587-china-backs-india-emissions-cut-stance.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/31168-beijing-does-u-turn-praises-india-china-bond.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/40190-india-china-ready-climate-draft.html

Nepal

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/41600-nepal-seeks-weapons-india.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/40874-india-resume-military-cooperation-nepal.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/39771-india-nepal-agree-expedite-major-hydro-power-plant.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/40812-raw-ibs-biggest-anti-terror-covert-ops-abroad.html

The Nepal Police’s former additional inspector-general Rajendra Bahadur Singh admits that terrorists have been using Nepal as a hideout. “But we have cooperated fully with Indian agencies,” he says. “Every time India has brought a case to our notice, we have taken action. It has been a very special relationship.” That relationship froze when the Maoists came to power briefly.

as for everyone else

Indo-US civilian nuclear agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

India, France agree on civil nuclear cooperation

Kazakh nuclear, oil deals hang in balance - International Business - Biz - The Times of India

NDTV.com: UK, Canada eye India's nuclear business

BBC NEWS | South Asia | Russia agrees India nuclear deal

559dfca22d7dc682471e0d18aedf293c.jpg


b241b59f0dfd0624c6d255b54fee8a82.jpg


5f944f49f88b3ed2a5f44752067540e2.jpg


I suggest you brush up a Little bit on

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_India

there is just too much information out there to disprove you. There is no way i can squeeze it into one post.

India has a lot of trust from many foreign nations. May have gone ahead to forge and attempt to forge strong solid relations.

Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal will have the most gain from Having better ties with India. At the forefront trade and Military security.

Trade with china is growing at a staggering rate. and we have cooperated On almost all global issues. Ranging from Energy, trade and climate change.

Pakistan is very much alone in no one can trust India campaign
 
.
Karan how can u say 5-10years?
About countering indian purchases lol dude we dont compremise our NATIONAL SECURITY from a country that is hell bent on destroying us by supporting talibans and can go to war without declaring war
NOBODY CAN TRUST INDIA

Well, I meant 5-10 years in getting rid of the existing terrorist infestations and recovering from all the mess they have created in your country. I believe, the 1st activity will be much faster and the second (of recovery ) may take longer and hence the time frame of 5-10 years.

About, war, I personally think, its a lot of posturing on part of all invovled. That too, because, everyone knows that there cant be any. You may have border skirmishes, intrusions etc.. but a full blown war.. not gonna happen. In each combination (whether its India - Pakistan or India China or even India-China / Pak), even the side expected to loose is strong enough to inflict crippling damage on the victor, so inspite of what likes of Kapoor or Kayani(who is one of the most stable/composed Pakistani military brass I have seen) keep saying, its not going to go down that way..All it does is give fodder to the likes of us to argue on the forums like this..
:blah:

Every one (country) is too busy making /wanting to make economic progress to allow this catastrophe.

cheers
 
. .
gogbot mate great post....:yahoo:
ab07c5c5532c0c821a541a53f0fb28d7.gif



@beckham:
dear i have sent u a pm, please check...
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom