What's new

In Hong Kong, memories of China's Tiananmen Square massacre are being erased

Muslims are action oriented and large in numbers. We have a history of destroying super powers. We brought many arrogant’s to their knees many times. China is nothing for us. Muslims have faced Roman Empire, Persians, Mongols, India (historical), Chinese (historical), Arab Mushriks, Jews and every European empire, USA, Soviets, NATO, many African countries, and many others who tried to fight us.
What action have Chinese ever toke?
Muslims have a history of less talking more action and that’s why Chinese are paranoid putting all Uyghur’s in concentration camps.
If you talk about history, China traditionally is not an enemy of any religions, Han Chinese mixed with ancient Muslims so well and they formed China's biggest Muslim group Hui Muslims who are everywhere in China. Muslim countries are traditionally all on good terms with China cause we never have old legacy grudge or feuds, All Muslim countries now are China's friends, although many Muslim countries themselves are sworn enemies in today's geopolitics, not even one Muslim country is China's enemy. your hysteric cry won't change this fact, no matter how hard you try, you can keep it up, good luck, lol
 
Like this....
This is getting really boring.
OK here are the facts....again.

The Myth of Tiananmen - Columbia Journalism Review

What is lost in this

The hoax was referring to the massacre at the Square itself where the thousands of students were at.

Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim - Telegraph

Quote
A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel.
End Quote


Quote “In 2009, James Miles, who was the BBC correspondent in Beijing at the time, admitted that he had "conveyed the wrong impression" and that "there was no massacre on Tiananmen Square.”


The point is very clear. Western media sold the story of thousands of unarmed and peaceful young students were gunned down and rolled over as they were sleeping ???

This was the story that was told to people like you who want to believe such a thing happened. For a good 20 years !

Quote"

At about 1:00 am, the army finally reached Tiananmen Square and waited for orders from the government. The soldiers had been told not to open fire, but they had also been told that they must clear the square by 6:00 a.m.–-no exceptions. They made a final offer of amnesty if the few thousand remaining students would leave. About 4:00 am, student leaders put the matter to a vote: Leave the square, or stay and face the consequences.[105]

The remaining students, numbering a few hundred, left the square under the military's watch before dawn.


Majority of the death occurred on the roads leading to the square when the PLA had to fight their way through road blocks into the square.


Some sources say that protesters first threw rocks and Molotov cocktails at police and army vehicles and lit many vehicles on fire in the streets leading to the Tiananmen, some with their occupants still inside them. There were reports of soldiers being burned alive in their armoured personnel carriers while others were beaten to death. Therefore, soldiers responded by opening fire on protesters. These protesters were mostly workers and not students. Students were mainly at the square.

Hard to say it was a massacre if PLA had to FIGHT their way through.


Apparently last year, Hou Dejian - a June 4th protest leader, came back to the Mainland from TW to give a surprise performance at the Bird's Nest. This is also the student leader who admitted that he never personally saw any killing/weapons firing/tanks running over people on the Square that day.


Jo Smith Finley was kicked of of China so she has beef with China. Evidences are mostly anecdotal.
 
Last edited:
Like this....
This is getting really boring.
OK here are the facts....again.

The Myth of Tiananmen - Columbia Journalism Review

What is lost in this

The hoax was referring to the massacre at the Square itself where the thousands of students were at.

Wikileaks: no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square, cables claim - Telegraph

Quote
A BBC reporter watching from a high floor of the Beijing Hotel said he saw soldiers shooting at students at the monument in the center of the square. But as the many journalists who tried to watch the action from that relatively safe vantage point can attest, the middle of the square is not visible from the hotel.
End Quote


Quote “In 2009, James Miles, who was the BBC correspondent in Beijing at the time, admitted that he had "conveyed the wrong impression" and that "there was no massacre on Tiananmen Square.”


The point is very clear. Western media sold the story of thousands of unarmed and peaceful young students were gunned down and rolled over as they were sleeping ???

This was the story that was told to people like you who want to believe such a thing happened. For a good 20 years !

Quote"

At about 1:00 am, the army finally reached Tiananmen Square and waited for orders from the government. The soldiers had been told not to open fire, but they had also been told that they must clear the square by 6:00 a.m.–-no exceptions. They made a final offer of amnesty if the few thousand remaining students would leave. About 4:00 am, student leaders put the matter to a vote: Leave the square, or stay and face the consequences.[105]

The remaining students, numbering a few hundred, left the square under the military's watch before dawn.


Majority of the death occurred on the roads leading to the square when the PLA had to fight their way through road blocks into the square.


Some sources say that protesters first threw rocks and Molotov cocktails at police and army vehicles and lit many vehicles on fire in the streets leading to the Tiananmen, some with their occupants still inside them. There were reports of soldiers being burned alive in their armoured personnel carriers while others were beaten to death. Therefore, soldiers responded by opening fire on protesters. These protesters were mostly workers and not students. Students were mainly at the square.

Hard to say it was a massacre if PLA had to FIGHT their way through.


Apparently last year, Hou Dejian - a June 4th protest leader, came back to the Mainland from TW to give a surprise performance at the Bird's Nest. This is also the student leader who admitted that he never personally saw any killing/weapons firing/tanks running over people on the Square that day.


Jo Smith Finley was kicked of of China so she has beef with China. Evidences are mostly anecdotal.
Yea. Photos are lies. Media is lying. The one accused of the massacre - CCP is the only truthful one here. Haha
 
Yea. Photos are lies. Media is lying. The one accused of the massacre - CCP is the only truthful one here. Haha
yes, you know how propaganda photos can be framed adjusted & not telling the whole story, right?
 
Yea. Photos are lies. Media is lying. The one accused of the massacre - CCP is the only truthful one here. Haha
Did I post anything from the CCP ?
So what did CCP said that was a lie ?
 
Just based on how heavily documented the tianamen massacre is — I didn’t think it were possible for people to straight up allege conspiracy or fabrication. I guess I was wrong.

I do hope the CCP will focus a bit more on isolationism — god forbid these brainwashed trolls are let loose into the global population.
 
The wishful Indians here jumping in on a tiananmen massacre theory like they ever experience it or have any relation with that ,while being forever caged in their little heIIhoIe of a state, they can do nothing but spew nonsense like a troll, so hopeless in the manner they speak that it's impossible to acertain whether they are a desperate troll or seriously believe the degenerate stuff they are peddling,it's a mixture of both,they have to lie to themselves to live with their self-inflicted shameful state before their own perceived rival.
 
Back
Top Bottom