What's new

In 50 yrs, 1.2 billion people in India will face Sahara-like heat

Khanivore

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
1,395
Reaction score
0
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Netherlands
Not looking good for Pakistan either.

One billion people will live in insufferable heat within 50 years – study

Human cost of climate crisis will hit harder and sooner than previously believed, research reveals


Jonathan Watts | Tue 5 May 2020 09.52 BST | The Guardian (UK)

The human cost of the climate crisis will hit harder, wider and sooner than previously believed, according to a study that shows a billion people will either be displaced or forced to endure insufferable heat for every additional 1C rise in the global temperature.

In a worst-case scenario of accelerating emissions, areas currently home to a third of the world’s population will be as hot as the hottest parts of the Sahara within 50 years, the paper warns. Even in the most optimistic outlook, 1.2 billion people will fall outside the comfortable “climate niche” in which humans have thrived for at least 6,000 years.

The authors of the study said they were “floored” and “blown away” by the findings because they had not expected our species to be so vulnerable.

“The numbers are flabbergasting. I literally did a double take when I first saw them, ” Tim Lenton, of Exeter University, said. “I’ve previously studied climate tipping points, which are usually considered apocalyptic. But this hit home harder. This puts the threat in very human terms.”

“There will be more change in the next 50 years than in the past 6,000 years.”

Instead of looking at climate change as a problem of physics or economics, the paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examines how it affects the human habitat.

The vast majority of humanity has always lived in regions where the average annual temperatures are around 6C (43F) to 28C (82F), which is ideal for human health and food production. But this sweet spot is shifting and shrinking as a result of manmade global heating, which drops more people into what the authors describe as “near unliveable” extremes.

Humanity is particularly sensitive because we are concentrated on land – which is warming faster than the oceans – and because most future population growth will be in already hot regions of Africa and Asia. As a result of these demographic factors, the average human will experience a temperature increase of 7.5C when global temperatures reach 3C, which is forecast towards the end of this century.

At that level, about 30% of the world’s population would live in extreme heat – defined as an average temperature of 29C (84F). These conditions are extremely rare outside the most scorched parts of the Sahara, but with global heating of 3C they are projected to envelop 1.2 billion people in India, 485 million in Nigeria and more than 100 million in each of Pakistan, Indonesia and Sudan.

u74pxE2.png


This would add enormously to migration pressures and pose challenges to food production systems.

“I think it is fair to say that average temperatures over 29C are unliveable. You’d have to move or adapt. But there are limits to adaptation. If you have enough money and energy, you can use air conditioning and fly in food and then you might be OK. But that is not the case for most people,” said one of the lead authors of the study, Prof Marten Scheffer of Wageningen University.

An ecologist by training, Scheffer said the study started as a thought-experiment. He had previously studied the climate distribution of rainforests and savanna and wondered what the result would be if he applied the same methodology to humans. “We know that most creatures’ habitats are limited by temperature. For example, penguins are only found in cold water and corals only in warm water. But we did not expect humans to be so sensitive. We think of ourselves as very adaptable because we use clothes, heating and air conditioning. But, in fact, the vast majority of people live – and have always lived – inside a climate niche that is now moving as never before.”

We were blown away by the magnitude,” he said. “There will be more change in the next 50 years than in the past 6,000 years.”

The authors said their findings should spur policymakers to accelerate emission cuts and work together to cope with migration because each degree of warming that can be avoided will save a billion people from falling out of humanity’s climate niche.

“Clearly we will need a global approach to safeguard our children against the potentially enormous social tensions the projected change could invoke,” another of the authors, Xu Chi of Nanjing University, said.
 
.
let us control green house gas emission under control .
 
. . .
There should be strict regulations for the construction industry to ensure a healthy energy efficient lifestyle. The cement jungles work as giant conductors for heat and all sort of unhealthy sciences.

Sustainable methods of construction offer a much diverse economic platform as well for the masses.

Humans are being baked into clay cramped in small spaces while potential solar energy is wasted.

Dangerous amount of asbestos is also used in the construction industry quite widely.
 
.
There should be strict regulations for the construction industry to ensure a healthy energy efficient lifestyle. The cement jungles work as giant conductors for heat and all sort of unhealthy sciences.

Sustainable methods of construction offer a much diverse economic platform as well for the masses.

Humans are being baked into clay cramped in small spaces while potential solar energy is wasted.

Dangerous amount of asbestos is also used in the construction industry quite widely.

A rare glimpse into the brains hidden away.
 
.
There's also an issue with population density.
 
.
The main things humans need to control is emissions. Going green quickly is the only solution. Most of emissions are produced by 24/7 running factories, over producing items and shoving it down people's throats. This consumer based society is the main problem.
Once tempratures deviate, its not just going to be the human habitat problem but food shortage, as we wont be able to grow crops on vast areas.
 
. .
Population is the main problem. There should be a population control law like China.

Agreed! maximum 2 kids should be allowed.
If anyone is having more than two kids than they shuld not get any government jobs.
 
.
Agreed! maximum 2 kids should be allowed.
If anyone is having more than two kids than they shuld not get any government jobs.
That'll be unfair and stupid we already have an issue of female infanticide you want to increase it?

The best way is to increase the education of females. Provide incentives for the higher education of women.
 
.
Not looking good for Pakistan either.

One billion people will live in insufferable heat within 50 years – study

Human cost of climate crisis will hit harder and sooner than previously believed, research reveals


Jonathan Watts | Tue 5 May 2020 09.52 BST | The Guardian (UK)

The human cost of the climate crisis will hit harder, wider and sooner than previously believed, according to a study that shows a billion people will either be displaced or forced to endure insufferable heat for every additional 1C rise in the global temperature.

In a worst-case scenario of accelerating emissions, areas currently home to a third of the world’s population will be as hot as the hottest parts of the Sahara within 50 years, the paper warns. Even in the most optimistic outlook, 1.2 billion people will fall outside the comfortable “climate niche” in which humans have thrived for at least 6,000 years.

The authors of the study said they were “floored” and “blown away” by the findings because they had not expected our species to be so vulnerable.

“The numbers are flabbergasting. I literally did a double take when I first saw them, ” Tim Lenton, of Exeter University, said. “I’ve previously studied climate tipping points, which are usually considered apocalyptic. But this hit home harder. This puts the threat in very human terms.”

“There will be more change in the next 50 years than in the past 6,000 years.”

Instead of looking at climate change as a problem of physics or economics, the paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examines how it affects the human habitat.

The vast majority of humanity has always lived in regions where the average annual temperatures are around 6C (43F) to 28C (82F), which is ideal for human health and food production. But this sweet spot is shifting and shrinking as a result of manmade global heating, which drops more people into what the authors describe as “near unliveable” extremes.

Humanity is particularly sensitive because we are concentrated on land – which is warming faster than the oceans – and because most future population growth will be in already hot regions of Africa and Asia. As a result of these demographic factors, the average human will experience a temperature increase of 7.5C when global temperatures reach 3C, which is forecast towards the end of this century.

At that level, about 30% of the world’s population would live in extreme heat – defined as an average temperature of 29C (84F). These conditions are extremely rare outside the most scorched parts of the Sahara, but with global heating of 3C they are projected to envelop 1.2 billion people in India, 485 million in Nigeria and more than 100 million in each of Pakistan, Indonesia and Sudan.

u74pxE2.png


This would add enormously to migration pressures and pose challenges to food production systems.

“I think it is fair to say that average temperatures over 29C are unliveable. You’d have to move or adapt. But there are limits to adaptation. If you have enough money and energy, you can use air conditioning and fly in food and then you might be OK. But that is not the case for most people,” said one of the lead authors of the study, Prof Marten Scheffer of Wageningen University.

An ecologist by training, Scheffer said the study started as a thought-experiment. He had previously studied the climate distribution of rainforests and savanna and wondered what the result would be if he applied the same methodology to humans. “We know that most creatures’ habitats are limited by temperature. For example, penguins are only found in cold water and corals only in warm water. But we did not expect humans to be so sensitive. We think of ourselves as very adaptable because we use clothes, heating and air conditioning. But, in fact, the vast majority of people live – and have always lived – inside a climate niche that is now moving as never before.”

We were blown away by the magnitude,” he said. “There will be more change in the next 50 years than in the past 6,000 years.”

The authors said their findings should spur policymakers to accelerate emission cuts and work together to cope with migration because each degree of warming that can be avoided will save a billion people from falling out of humanity’s climate niche.

“Clearly we will need a global approach to safeguard our children against the potentially enormous social tensions the projected change could invoke,” another of the authors, Xu Chi of Nanjing University, said.

We are living extremely unsustainable lifestyles or aspiring to. Add population growth and ever increasing longer lifespans.

Expect more disruptions in the form of bush fires and droughts. Australia experienced one of the worst bush fire on record.

The one small silver lining in current pandemic situation is we might actually see a glimpse of how nature might heal itself with most of the population and human activities under lockdown. Humans collectively must come together to see the benefits of reduced activities.
 
.
That'll be unfair and stupid we already have an issue of female infanticide you want to increase it?

The best way is to increase the education of females. Provide incentives for the higher education of women.

Its not possible in country like India. We need to follow same kind of Chinese model.

Now, people go for third child if first two are girls.. If have have girl and boy then they don't go for 3rd child (educated people).

So, I strongly support for only 2 children. We have to implement such policies otherwise it will be too late..
 
.
There should be legitimate culling of the stupid and the poor. In that way the population density will be reduced and the stupidity level of posts on PDF will be greatly diminished.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom