What's new

Imran Khan’s Fall From Grace Is His Own Fault: Claims Indian author

Imran Khan’s Fall From Grace Is His Own Fault​

With his populist bravado and anti-Western rhetoric, the Pakistani prime minister has stumbled into a trap of his own making.

Pakistan is once again facing a political crisis. In a country where democratically elected leaders are regularly ousted from office, that should not be entirely surprising.

Yet this time it is. Although Prime Minister Imran Khan was elected in 2018 with only a slender majority in the National Assembly, he seemed likely to serve out his term without incident. His personal popularity was unquestioned. The economy appeared to have bottomed out. The opposition was divided and in disarray, with corruption cases against most of its senior leaders.

Most importantly, Khan had the clear backing of Pakistan’s powerful military. And, last year, Khan received a shot in the arm thanks to the disorderly U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, which installed a friendly Taliban regime next door.

Now Khan faces a no-confidence motion brought by an enraged, united opposition that he might well lose. Even if he survives, he will find his political capital severely dented — and be even more in debt to the military.

In large measure, he has only himself to blame. Khan has been caught up in his own rhetoric. He stormed into office promising to build an Islamist welfare state, not a reform-minded and growth-focused modern economy. For decades, he had targeted the United States and the West as the source of Pakistan’s problems and he did not tone down that rhetoric in office. He insisted that every other political leader was corrupt and, in Trumpian fashion, that he alone could fix Pakistan.

This persecution of the opposition leadership created a strong incentive for parties and politicians who had long been rivals to unify. Meanwhile, despite all his anti-corruption rhetoric, many of his erstwhile supporters have noticed a conspicuous lack of new evidence being unearthed or new criminal cases being filed against the leaders Khan promised to hold to account.

But the biggest problem is the economy. Pakistan has never been able to solve its dependence on imports. When its rupee depreciates or oil prices increase, it immediately faces intolerably high inflation — well over 12% now, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused spikes in commodity prices, as compared to an average of 5% or so in the five years before Khan took office.

The central bank’s benchmark interest rate is touching 10%. The balance of payments may hit a record this year. The Pakistan rupee has lost about half its value since Khan took office.


Khan’s response has been characteristic: He has announced subsidies for petroleum products and electricity to cushion the impact on voters. Given his political promise was not responsible governance but a new welfare state, he could hardly have done otherwise.

His government and its partisans have responded angrily to suggestions that Pakistan’s economy is in trouble. An official statement from the Finance Ministry denounced “fabricated narratives” about the economy in the global media. They’ve implied that the pandemic and the Ukraine war are to blame for any difficulties.


But the fact is that growth was slowing sharply even before the Covid-19 pandemic, down from 6% in the financial year before Khan took office to just over 3% in 2018-19 and shrinking in 2019-20. Khan’s welfare-focused profligacy hasn’t helped. The fiscal deficit tops 7% and interest payments swallow up a third of the federal budget.

In order to try and fill the fiscal gap without making politically disruptive changes to the direct tax base, Khan’s government has focused on import taxes, which now provide over 40% of government revenue. But that has left Pakistan ever more disconnected from global value chains, which depend on both exports and imports being easy and minimally taxed.

A country in such a precarious position would normally be able to turn to the International Monetary Fund or other global institutions for help. But how can Khan possibly admit he needs aid from the West? While Pakistan has signed up to a $6 billion bailout from the IMF, Khan cannot be seen to undertake any of the reforms the Fund wants, as that would compromise his anti-Western stance.

 
True. I agree.

IK should prove his majority in parliament & continue to be strong. If he can not do that, he must reorient his politics, his party, & his support.

IK would have won 2023 elections, had he organized his party well & played sensible politics. He did everything that was detrimental to his politics & is now paying the price. I used to tell myself that IK is a great leader but his advisors are bad. When he marched on Islamabad with TuQ, I had to conclude that he has advisors of his own liking and therefore he himself is at fault.

Machiavelli said that to see the quality of the ruler, notice the people around him. It is very much true.


what do you mean by this nonsense comment?
Its opposition who has to show number 172 and not govt.

No itehadi etc has resigned from their seat nor announced.
 

Imran Khan’s Fall From Grace Is His Own Fault​

With his populist bravado and anti-Western rhetoric, the Pakistani prime minister has stumbled into a trap of his own making.

Pakistan is once again facing a political crisis. In a country where democratically elected leaders are regularly ousted from office, that should not be entirely surprising.

Yet this time it is. Although Prime Minister Imran Khan was elected in 2018 with only a slender majority in the National Assembly, he seemed likely to serve out his term without incident. His personal popularity was unquestioned. The economy appeared to have bottomed out. The opposition was divided and in disarray, with corruption cases against most of its senior leaders.

Most importantly, Khan had the clear backing of Pakistan’s powerful military. And, last year, Khan received a shot in the arm thanks to the disorderly U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, which installed a friendly Taliban regime next door.

Now Khan faces a no-confidence motion brought by an enraged, united opposition that he might well lose. Even if he survives, he will find his political capital severely dented — and be even more in debt to the military.

In large measure, he has only himself to blame. Khan has been caught up in his own rhetoric. He stormed into office promising to build an Islamist welfare state, not a reform-minded and growth-focused modern economy. For decades, he had targeted the United States and the West as the source of Pakistan’s problems and he did not tone down that rhetoric in office. He insisted that every other political leader was corrupt and, in Trumpian fashion, that he alone could fix Pakistan.

This persecution of the opposition leadership created a strong incentive for parties and politicians who had long been rivals to unify. Meanwhile, despite all his anti-corruption rhetoric, many of his erstwhile supporters have noticed a conspicuous lack of new evidence being unearthed or new criminal cases being filed against the leaders Khan promised to hold to account.

But the biggest problem is the economy. Pakistan has never been able to solve its dependence on imports. When its rupee depreciates or oil prices increase, it immediately faces intolerably high inflation — well over 12% now, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused spikes in commodity prices, as compared to an average of 5% or so in the five years before Khan took office.

The central bank’s benchmark interest rate is touching 10%. The balance of payments may hit a record this year. The Pakistan rupee has lost about half its value since Khan took office.


Khan’s response has been characteristic: He has announced subsidies for petroleum products and electricity to cushion the impact on voters. Given his political promise was not responsible governance but a new welfare state, he could hardly have done otherwise.

His government and its partisans have responded angrily to suggestions that Pakistan’s economy is in trouble. An official statement from the Finance Ministry denounced “fabricated narratives” about the economy in the global media. They’ve implied that the pandemic and the Ukraine war are to blame for any difficulties.


But the fact is that growth was slowing sharply even before the Covid-19 pandemic, down from 6% in the financial year before Khan took office to just over 3% in 2018-19 and shrinking in 2019-20. Khan’s welfare-focused profligacy hasn’t helped. The fiscal deficit tops 7% and interest payments swallow up a third of the federal budget.

In order to try and fill the fiscal gap without making politically disruptive changes to the direct tax base, Khan’s government has focused on import taxes, which now provide over 40% of government revenue. But that has left Pakistan ever more disconnected from global value chains, which depend on both exports and imports being easy and minimally taxed.

A country in such a precarious position would normally be able to turn to the International Monetary Fund or other global institutions for help. But how can Khan possibly admit he needs aid from the West? While Pakistan has signed up to a $6 billion bailout from the IMF, Khan cannot be seen to undertake any of the reforms the Fund wants, as that would compromise his anti-Western stance.








The ONLY person who has fallen from grace is the poster of the OP who believes in indian/gangu opinions..............:lol:
 
Its opposition who has to show number 172 and not govt.
Sure. But for that to happen the speaker has to hold the session for the purpose. So far the speaker has acted entirely as a pawn of PM rather than custodian of the house. So once the government runs out of excuses to postpone the inevitable, we shall see what happens.
 
True. I agree.

IK should prove his majority in parliament & continue to be strong. If he can not do that, he must reorient his politics, his party, & his support.

IK would have won 2023 elections, had he organized his party well & played sensible politics. He did everything that was detrimental to his politics & is now paying the price. I used to tell myself that IK is a great leader but his advisors are bad. When he marched on Islamabad with TuQ, I had to conclude that he has advisors of his own liking and therefore he himself is at fault.

Machiavelli said that to see the quality of the ruler, notice the people around him. It is very much true.


what do you mean by this nonsense comment?

Or he may be the perfect example of an opportunist, may have sold his soul to devil to fight the devil?

How true he is about reforms and his past promises can only be confirmed once he has 2/3 rd majority, and if then he remains what he is currently then Pakistanis surely have been deceived by the biggest con artist of the century.
 
Sure. But for that to happen the speaker has to hold the session for the purpose. So far the speaker has acted entirely as a pawn of PM rather than custodian of the house. So once the government runs out of excuses to postpone the inevitable, we shall see what happens.
that will happen on monday as per agenda.

calling off session is totally according to the rules. If opposition think its not they can take him to court.

If we see public support its lies with imran khan so what opposition is talking about?
 
Imran khan fell from grace? Oh Indian author. Makes sense now.
 
that will happen on monday as per agenda.

calling off session is totally according to the rules. If opposition think its not they can take him to court.

If we see public support its lies with imran khan so what opposition is talking about?
How will you measure public support? Would it be something like the PTV attack in August 2014?

There is only one metric: a vote in the House of Representatives. All else is a diversion or distraction. I do not believe that 2018 General Elections were fair. But I will continue to tolerate this dispensation in name of continuity.

BTW, the Speaker is already in violation of the Constitution & calling off yesterday's session is more proof of his intentions.
 
How will you measure public support? Would it be something like the PTV attack in August 2014?

There is only one metric: a vote in the House of Representatives. All else is a diversion or distraction. I do not believe that 2018 General Elections were fair. But I will continue to tolerate this dispensation in name of continuity.

BTW, the Speaker is already in violation of the Constitution & calling off yesterday's session is more proof of his intentions.
we can see public support everywhere, in social media, in normal day life. go out and check yourself. Why maryam calling off or ppp caling off for dharna because no public support and tommorow it will show clear picture.

Calling of session due to death of assembly member after dua had happened 20 times before.
So what violation you been talking about?

that's fine if you dont beleive because no one cares what you beleive

this is even karkoon of pmln is not taking their party seriously.

 
Last edited:
How will you measure public support? Would it be something like the PTV attack in August 2014?

There is only one metric: a vote in the House of Representatives. All else is a diversion or distraction. I do not believe that 2018 General Elections were fair. But I will continue to tolerate this dispensation in name of continuity.

BTW, the Speaker is already in violation of the Constitution & calling off yesterday's session is more proof of his intentions.

Not fair?

The Free and Fair Election Network, declared that election more transparent and free than previous elections; IK literally said he would reopen any constituency where the opposition could prove vote rigging; EU observers stated the elections were well conducted and transparent.

Just because your favorite party lost doesnt mean that the entire election was fraudulent.
 
IK was incompetent but still thousand times better than this corrupt traitor tola and Pak establishment which keeps this tola alive for their own benefit.
 
There is only one metric: a vote in the House of Representatives. All else is a diversion or distraction. I do not believe that 2018 General Elections were fair. But I will continue to tolerate this dispensation in name of continuity.

Elections are only fair in Pakistan when Mian sahab wins.
 
How will you measure public support? Would it be something like the PTV attack in August 2014?

There is only one metric: a vote in the House of Representatives. All else is a diversion or distraction. I do not believe that 2018 General Elections were fair. But I will continue to tolerate this dispensation in name of continuity.

BTW, the Speaker is already in violation of the Constitution & calling off yesterday's session is more proof of his intentions.
2013 elections were probably the dirtiest in the history of the World and yes I am exaggerating, only slightly. That asshole Kayani stole the mandate of the public. No elections in the history of Pakistan have been fair, especially none that main saanp won. Every election had establishment involvement, like it or not, this is how Pakistani elections and governments work and will continue to do so.
 
;'
1648326636034.png


-;,
 
Back
Top Bottom