What's new

Imran Khan’s Fall From Grace Is His Own Fault: Claims Indian author

Imran Khan’s Fall From Grace Is His Own Fault​

With his populist bravado and anti-Western rhetoric, the Pakistani prime minister has stumbled into a trap of his own making.

Pakistan is once again facing a political crisis. In a country where democratically elected leaders are regularly ousted from office, that should not be entirely surprising.

Yet this time it is. Although Prime Minister Imran Khan was elected in 2018 with only a slender majority in the National Assembly, he seemed likely to serve out his term without incident. His personal popularity was unquestioned. The economy appeared to have bottomed out. The opposition was divided and in disarray, with corruption cases against most of its senior leaders.

Most importantly, Khan had the clear backing of Pakistan’s powerful military. And, last year, Khan received a shot in the arm thanks to the disorderly U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, which installed a friendly Taliban regime next door.

Now Khan faces a no-confidence motion brought by an enraged, united opposition that he might well lose. Even if he survives, he will find his political capital severely dented — and be even more in debt to the military.

In large measure, he has only himself to blame. Khan has been caught up in his own rhetoric. He stormed into office promising to build an Islamist welfare state, not a reform-minded and growth-focused modern economy. For decades, he had targeted the United States and the West as the source of Pakistan’s problems and he did not tone down that rhetoric in office. He insisted that every other political leader was corrupt and, in Trumpian fashion, that he alone could fix Pakistan.

This persecution of the opposition leadership created a strong incentive for parties and politicians who had long been rivals to unify. Meanwhile, despite all his anti-corruption rhetoric, many of his erstwhile supporters have noticed a conspicuous lack of new evidence being unearthed or new criminal cases being filed against the leaders Khan promised to hold to account.

But the biggest problem is the economy. Pakistan has never been able to solve its dependence on imports. When its rupee depreciates or oil prices increase, it immediately faces intolerably high inflation — well over 12% now, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused spikes in commodity prices, as compared to an average of 5% or so in the five years before Khan took office.

The central bank’s benchmark interest rate is touching 10%. The balance of payments may hit a record this year. The Pakistan rupee has lost about half its value since Khan took office.


Khan’s response has been characteristic: He has announced subsidies for petroleum products and electricity to cushion the impact on voters. Given his political promise was not responsible governance but a new welfare state, he could hardly have done otherwise.

His government and its partisans have responded angrily to suggestions that Pakistan’s economy is in trouble. An official statement from the Finance Ministry denounced “fabricated narratives” about the economy in the global media. They’ve implied that the pandemic and the Ukraine war are to blame for any difficulties.


But the fact is that growth was slowing sharply even before the Covid-19 pandemic, down from 6% in the financial year before Khan took office to just over 3% in 2018-19 and shrinking in 2019-20. Khan’s welfare-focused profligacy hasn’t helped. The fiscal deficit tops 7% and interest payments swallow up a third of the federal budget.

In order to try and fill the fiscal gap without making politically disruptive changes to the direct tax base, Khan’s government has focused on import taxes, which now provide over 40% of government revenue. But that has left Pakistan ever more disconnected from global value chains, which depend on both exports and imports being easy and minimally taxed.

A country in such a precarious position would normally be able to turn to the International Monetary Fund or other global institutions for help. But how can Khan possibly admit he needs aid from the West? While Pakistan has signed up to a $6 billion bailout from the IMF, Khan cannot be seen to undertake any of the reforms the Fund wants, as that would compromise his anti-Western stance.

 
Not fair?

The Free and Fair Election Network, declared that election more transparent and free than previous elections; IK literally said he would reopen any constituency where the opposition could prove vote rigging; EU observers stated the elections were well conducted and transparent.

Just because your favorite party lost doesnt mean that the entire election was fraudulent.
Anything IK 'literally' says generally means the exact opposite of the truth. This is based on his track record & actual facts. FAFEN said a number of things, & I suggest that you address all of them. Mind, I know multiple instances of pre-poll, polling-day, & post-polling rigging & I will NOT entertain any 3rd party reference that disputes what I KNOW.

Elections are only fair in Pakistan when Mian sahab wins.
Do you think that you are making any argument here?

Why would there be all sorts of rigging to favor the donkey if he could actually win the elections?

Did you even vote in Pakistan? If so, did you notice the presence of army in the polling stations? Had you been here, you would know that soldiers low-key inquired about voting intentions too. In many places they were found 'counting' votes as well. If you experienced none of this, I suggest you shut your gob & mind your own business in Germany & let us in Pakistan worry about ours.
 
Last edited:
2013 elections were probably the dirtiest in the history of the World and yes I am exaggerating, only slightly. That asshole Kayani stole the mandate of the public. No elections in the history of Pakistan have been fair, especially none that main saanp won. Every election had establishment involvement, like it or not, this is how Pakistani elections and governments work and will continue to do so.
I disagree, & I would like you to show me credible references for your idiotic assertions.

FYI, the whole thing did go to the courts and IK & Co later ate their words. What is truly dirty is your mind & stubborn attitude. Just go & see what happened to the whole 'Paintee Painchure' campaign & how all the dirty foul-mouths had to excuse their lies as political talk. None of the actual assholes had the decency to apologize. If you want to find fault with Kayani, there are other more relevant issues to talk about. Just because your darling lost elections, does not mean that you lay it all at the feet of Kayani.
 
He made many mistakes...

1st he didn't go imf... Tried to take loans from other countries.

2nd - everything handover to IMF later.

And finally, he got the vote against the corruption and politicians.

But the country rank on corruption more deep down because he compromised with having corrupt people on his left and right.

I believe that imran khan is not corrupted but for him, too much to handle inside and outside corruptions..

General musharraf was a best leader that I have seen in the past 2 - 3 decades.. Also, the world was respected to him as well.
Pray tell why did IK had to go to IMF in the first place, is it because Nawaz lee Kuan Yew Sharif left the economy in such a stable and surplus state that IK didn't know what to do???
 
Fall from grace lol. Indian street shitter.

FO32qDHWQAs1fl8.jpeg


FO3wJAoXEAAnfFt.jpeg
FO4l9YfWYAUq1EA.jpg
 
if this is what "fall from grace" look like than I think we need to change our definition
nothing to see here- another nonsense obsessed Indian opinion about Pakistan

put it in the garbage bin where it belongs- part of the propaganda campaign that noony toones are clutching to
 
Last edited:
Of course in the author’s world a handover over a shambolic economy didn’t happen, worldwide inflation doesn’t happen, incompetent state institutions don’t happen etc.
There I left out that he’s an Indian fellow.
 
So what happened to been a yahoodi agent? The whole politics of patwari league, Diesel and others have been on the above pretext.
It has become abundantly clear who the yahoodi agent is and people now know better.
 
Anything IK 'literally' says generally means the exact opposite of the truth. This is based on his track record & actual facts. FAFEN said a number of things, & I suggest that you address all of them. Mind, I know multiple instances of pre-poll, polling-day, & post-polling rigging & I will NOT entertain any 3rd party reference that disputes what I KNOW.


Do you think that you are making any argument here?

Why would there be all sorts of rigging to favor the donkey if he could actually win the elections?

Did you even vote in Pakistan? If so, did you notice the presence of army in the polling stations? Had you been here, you would know that soldiers low-key inquired about voting intentions too. In many places they were found 'counting' votes as well. If you experienced none of this, I suggest you shut your gob & mind your own business in Germany & let us in Pakistan worry about ours.
Dude. You seem to have lived in chu chu land all your life. You have absolute 0 idea what has been happening in elections since the inception of Pakistan.
 
Dude. You seem to have lived in chu chu land all your life. You have absolute 0 idea what has been happening in elections since the inception of Pakistan.
Oh they have a great idea of what's been happening. It's just that people twist words similar to the people that they vote for:


Chaprasi k account me business transaction. OH BC konsa business hai jis me chaprasi k account me business transaction hoti hai?
 
The guy inherited a difficult job with all the corruption and miss management from previous leaders. You could day politically his still naive or was but the time in office has matured him. I think if he won a second term he would be better but it's looking difficult hel get a second
What's happening is nothing unusual. Not a single PM in this so called democratic country has completed his/her 5 year term.
If IK completes his he will write history.
 
Do you think that you are making any argument here?
No I wasn’t making any argument rather stating a simple fact that elections are only fair when bao gee wins.

Why would there be all sorts of rigging to favor the donkey if he could actually win the elections?
No, the donkey has never been able to win the election on his own, he always had the arbitrary support, unless you have any historical empirical data to prove it otherwise.

Did you even vote in Pakistan? If so, did you notice the presence of army in the polling stations? Had you been here, you would know that soldiers low-key inquired about voting intentions too. In many places they were found 'counting' votes as well. If you experienced none of this, I suggest you shut your gob & mind your own business in Germany & let us in Pakistan worry about ours.
Yes I have always voted in Pakistan, and I exactly know how polling stations are managed in Pakistan, I also happen to know how candidates are sure about their victory even before the election day (numerous MPA/MNA's are friends) and most importantly I am able to differentiate between a patriot or someone with vested interests. And yesterday was another example to ponder upon whether IK is selected or elected by the people.

Interesting times ahead my friend :enjoy:
 
The guy inherited a difficult job with all the corruption and miss management from previous leaders. ...
He wasn't built to rule Pakistan, just imposed on Pakistan which has lead to a national economic disaster.

He should've continued to spend his life touring the Western World for rest of his life and give speeches on how many countries he has visited and what he has learnt, instead of trying to become a flop, second rate Prime Minister.
 
Anything IK 'literally' says generally means the exact opposite of the truth. This is based on his track record & actual facts. FAFEN said a number of things, & I suggest that you address all of them. Mind, I know multiple instances of pre-poll, polling-day, & post-polling rigging & I will NOT entertain any 3rd party reference that disputes what I KNOW.


Do you think that you are making any argument here?

Why would there be all sorts of rigging to favor the donkey if he could actually win the elections?

Did you even vote in Pakistan? If so, did you notice the presence of army in the polling stations? Had you been here, you would know that soldiers low-key inquired about voting intentions too. In many places they were found 'counting' votes as well. If you experienced none of this, I suggest you shut your gob & mind your own business in Germany & let us in Pakistan worry about ours.

In the context of Pakistani elections, it was the most fair in a long time. How does whatever you personally witnessed at one location translate into widespread rigging?

The only bad thing I remember was that most signatures for the polling station forms were missing but the ECP said after that it was not necessary anyway. I also remember accusations of rigging from all parties, but their cases never went anywhere because there wasnt much evidence. Other than these and the alleged "media blackout" there wasnt any other discrepencies I can think of.
 
He wasn't built to rule Pakistan, just imposed on Pakistan which has lead to a national economic disaster.

He should've continued to spend his life touring the Western World for rest of his life and give speeches on how many countries he has visited and what he has learnt, instead of trying to become a flop, second rate Prime Minister.
So who do you think would have done a better job. PPP and Nawaz party have numerous documented cases of blatant corruption, would you prefer them back?
 
Back
Top Bottom