Imran Khan on ‘genocide’ in Kashmir and possible war with India.

[SIPRA]

Be smart. Smart guys go around crying peace but are the first to punch your lights out. It's all about perception on the global stage. PMIK gets lauded as a mature, responsible leader and that enables his message to get further. If it came to war PMIK would be first in. Would you ne taking him to court for not following his "pacifism".

Take a leaf out of USA. Talk and sing about freedom. But then deliver it via cruise missiles and bombs.

So it is in this case. I read the full article. It followed the American template. "We believe in freedom. Freedom now delivered via cruise missles". In PMIK's case he begins by talking about "how he is a pacifist" but then ends with "if Pakistan is a corner and nukes are the only option I dare not think what would happen".

This amounted to "I believe in pacifism and if it came to it I would deliver pacifism via nuke missiles".

What an articulate way of expressing. Highly appreciate it.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

What an articulate way of expressing. Highly appreciate it.

We finally have a PM who really understands the global pulse [read the west] and his using that understanding coupled with his remarkable profile in the west to sell Pakkstan's narrative. Gone are the days of isolated, failed Pakistan. Instead Pakistan is begining to gain a certain gloss to it. I don't g by what Pak media or what they say in Pakistan. I go by what I read in the west. There is a palpable change toward Pakistan. The same western media that would not give Pakistan inch is now bending backwards to accomodate it. If you look at PMIK being interviewed by global media they tend to be ever so gentle and soft.

We even saw the change in how PMIK was recieved by America. Fact is does ne look, talk, have the resume of being leader of a failed state?

He is the best thing to happen to Pakistan in my lifetime-Shahid Khan | 24 July 2019.

 

[SIPRA]

We finally have a PM who really understands the global pulse [read the west] and his using that understanding coupled with his remarkable profile in the west to sell Pakkstan's narrative. Gone are the days of isolated, failed Pakistan. Instead Pakistan is begining to gain a certain gloss to it. I don't g by what Pak media or what they say in Pakistan. I go by what I read in the west. There is a palpable change toward Pakistan. The same western media that would not give Pakistan inch is now bending backwards to accomodate it. If you look at PMIK being interviewed by global media they tend to be ever so gentle and soft.

We even saw the change in how PMIK was recieved by America. Fact is does ne look, talk, have the resume of being leader of a failed state?

He is the best thing to happen to Pakistan in my lifetime-Shahid Khan | 24 July 2019.

You are perfectly right. Things are moving in right direction, after a long long time and of course the credit goes to IK.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

You are perfectly right. Things are moving in right direction, after a long long time and of course the credit goes to IK.

Let's all hope so. Far too many decades Pakistan has been neglected. We as a people have so much potential. I really think forget about India, we can be better the the best countries in the west. I live in UK and this is not bombast given by some village idiot who has not seen the world. I mean just look at our glorious 8,000 years history. Compared to that UK, America, France are like some punk upstarts. But to leverage that potential we need good leaders and time.

The reason PMIK is good for us is simple. Forget about the policies. We can always get experts and technocrats like Shiehk Hafiz to do that. The fact is PMIK is the most recognized Pakistani in the world. Even better he is not recognized for planting bombs. At his prime in the west there was not a women, high or low who would not jump in bed with him. And not a man in the west who could say "I am not jealous of him". IK was the real James Bond.

And the reality was it jolted people. Pakistan can't be what they say it is if it can give birth to man like him.

 

[SIPRA]

Let's all hope so. Far too many decades Pakistan has been neglected. We as a people have so much potential. I really think forget about India, we can be better the the best countries in the west. I live in UK and this is not bombast given by some village idiot who has not seen the world. I mean just look at our glorious 8,000 years history. Compared to that UK, America, France are like some punk upstarts. But to leverage that potential we need good leaders and time.

The reason PMIK is good for us is simple. Forget about the policies. We can always get experts and technocrats like Shiehk Hafiz to do that. The fact is PMIK is the most recognized Pakistani in the world. Even better he is not recognized for planting bombs. At his prime in the west there was not a women, high or low who would not jump in bed with him. And not a man in the west who could say "I am not jealous of him". IK was the real James Bond.

And the reality was it jolted people. Pakistan can't be what they say it is if it can give birth to man like him.

You have said it all. Nothing much to add. Let us hope for the best.

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

This is BS its mean enemy can bang him he will not do anything?

Its propaganda, your very gullible

 

[Trango Towers]

This is BS its mean enemy can bang him he will not do anything?

no bhai this is strategy....the world must know we don't want war we are not aggressors...the army can start a war!!

 

[313ghazi]

Words of a coward.

 

[El Sidd]

War is a legal affair.

India has already declared war on Pakistan. It is not about idealism but accepting the brüte reality.

On one Hand, Mr. Khan declares that Modi is Hitler and India is a fascist Country with expansionist intentions and on the other Hand, Mr. Khan is refusing to go to war with Nazi India.

Mr. Khan has a Mandate to root out Corruption and seek long lasting beneficial reforms in the Country. He has no mandate for war.

Pakistan should hold snap elections if political Leadership is to be sought under this imposed war by Nazi India.

 

[Cash GK]

This is BS its mean enemy can bang him he will not do anything?

He is trying to convince world we are peace loving country... we have been portrayed terrorist in the world by India.. he is removing this image very successfully. We need reason to start war.. we already got that one.. I heard one US well known personality that Now India is not in possession to complain across borders Terrorism . India as opened the box.. now they have to suffer.. wait and see don’t jump to conclusions

 

[Baghial]

It has been a year since the former cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan became Pakistan's prime minister.

Khan's campaign slogan was "Naya Pakistan" or "New Pakistan", a reflection of his promises to turn the country's economy around and end corruption.

But the first year of his premiership has not gone as smoothly as he may have hoped or even expected, especially in terms of the economy. The Pakistani rupee has lost 35 percent of its value during his time in office.

Khan's critics call him the prime minister of u-turns, as he has been forced to go back on many of his campaign pledges in an attempt to rescue the situation.

"I'm glad they say I'm a prime minister of u-turns. Only an idiot doesn't do any u-turns," Khan tells Al Jazeera. "Only a moron, when he's on a course and he comes across a brick wall, only that stupid idiot keeps banging his head against a brick wall. An intelligent person immediately revises his strategy and goes around it."

When two nuclear-armed countries fight, if they fight a conventional war, there is every possibility that it is going to end up into nuclear war. The unthinkable.

Imran Khan, Pakistan PM

But have any of these "u-turns" had a positive impact on the country?

In terms of foreign affairs, Pakistan is closer than ever to its neighbour, China. But relations with its other neighbour, India, are at a new low.

Asked whether these two nuclear countries are at risk of another major conflict, or even war, Khan tells Al Jazeera he "absolutely" believes war with India could be a possibility.

"Eight million Muslims in Kashmir are under siege for almost now six weeks. And why this can become a flashpoint between India and Pakistan is because what we already know India is trying to do is divert attention from their illegal annexation and their impending genocide on Kashmir," he says. "They are taking the attention away by blaming Pakistan for terrorism."

"Pakistan would never start a war, and I am clear: I am a pacifist, I am anti-war, I believe that wars do not solve any problems," he says.

But, he adds: "When two nuclear-armed countries fight, if they fight a conventional war, there is every possibility that it is going to end up into nuclear war. The unthinkable."

"If say Pakistan, God forbid, we are fighting a conventional war, we are losing, and if a country is stuck between the choice: either you surrender or you fight 'til death for your freedom, I know Pakistanis will fight to death for their freedom. So when a nuclear-armed country fights to the end, to the death, it has consequences."

"So that's why we have approached the United Nations, we are approaching every international forum, that they must act right now because this is a potential disaster that would go way beyond the Indian subcontinent."

Until recently, Pakistan had made attempts to open dialogue with India "to live as civilised neighbours, to resolve our difference [over Kashmir] ... through a political settlement", but according to Khan, this is no longer the case.

"We discovered that while we were trying to have dialogue, they were trying to push us in the blacklist in FATF [Financial Action Task Force] ... If Pakistan is pushed into the blacklist of FATF that means there will be sanctions on Pakistan. So they were trying to bankrupt us economically, so that's when we pulled back. And that's when we realised that this government is on an agenda ... to push Pakistan to disaster," says Khan.

"There is no question of talking to the Indian government right now after they revoked this article 370 of their own constitution and they annexed Kashmir illegally against the UN Security Council resolution which had guaranteed the people that they would be able to hold a referendum, a plebiscite, to decide their destiny."

Khan has not only faced criticism about the country's ailing economy and his u-turns. Civil rights acitivists and journalists are saying that the space for dissent and freedom of expression has shrunk and that there was a crackdown against the media since he took office.

"This is utter and utter nonsense," Khan says. "Pakistan is one of the freest places in the world in media .... the freedom that journalists have in this country is unprecedented."

Asked about his government's achievements after its first year in office, Khan says: "We are already in a new Pakistan ... This government has done things which no government has done before. But, as they say, Rome was not built in a day. When you start making these massive changes, reforms, it takes time. The time to judge a government is five years ... The first year was the most difficult period, but from now onwards people will start seeing the difference ... the direction of the country is now right."



https://www.aljazeera.com/programme...nocide-kashmir-war-india-190913134545416.html

I am clear, we will not beg IMF : IMRAN?

I am clear , no conflict of intrests : IMRAN?

I am clear asad umer will turn economy around : IMRAN?

I am clear,I will not take corrupt mna,s : IMRAN?
??????????????????????????etc

i am clear , i lost my glasses to see clear...............

This is BS its mean enemy can bang him he will not do anything?

modi and donald made our pm,,, ( a fool) by faking kashmir resolve....

I'm also against war... only in the favour of war if it is forced on us.

Me Ny Kabhi Eent Ka Jawab Pathar Se Nahi Diya,,............................................................ Balke Wohi Eent Utha Ker Maari Hai.. Ab Pathar Kon Dhoondta Phiry.

 

[YeBeWarned]

He is not a Pacifists , he said he is going to make Pakistan Riyast-e-Medina , and Rasool Allah or Islam are not Pacifists, We believe in Defensive War, we won't start it but if someone threaten our homeland, our people , our way of Life and religion than its on ..

 

[alee92nawaz]

It has been a year since the former cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan became Pakistan's prime minister.

Khan's campaign slogan was "Naya Pakistan" or "New Pakistan", a reflection of his promises to turn the country's economy around and end corruption.

But the first year of his premiership has not gone as smoothly as he may have hoped or even expected, especially in terms of the economy. The Pakistani rupee has lost 35 percent of its value during his time in office.

Khan's critics call him the prime minister of u-turns, as he has been forced to go back on many of his campaign pledges in an attempt to rescue the situation.

"I'm glad they say I'm a prime minister of u-turns. Only an idiot doesn't do any u-turns," Khan tells Al Jazeera. "Only a moron, when he's on a course and he comes across a brick wall, only that stupid idiot keeps banging his head against a brick wall. An intelligent person immediately revises his strategy and goes around it."

When two nuclear-armed countries fight, if they fight a conventional war, there is every possibility that it is going to end up into nuclear war. The unthinkable.

Imran Khan, Pakistan PM

But have any of these "u-turns" had a positive impact on the country?

In terms of foreign affairs, Pakistan is closer than ever to its neighbour, China. But relations with its other neighbour, India, are at a new low.

Asked whether these two nuclear countries are at risk of another major conflict, or even war, Khan tells Al Jazeera he "absolutely" believes war with India could be a possibility.

"Eight million Muslims in Kashmir are under siege for almost now six weeks. And why this can become a flashpoint between India and Pakistan is because what we already know India is trying to do is divert attention from their illegal annexation and their impending genocide on Kashmir," he says. "They are taking the attention away by blaming Pakistan for terrorism."

"Pakistan would never start a war, and I am clear: I am a pacifist, I am anti-war, I believe that wars do not solve any problems," he says.

But, he adds: "When two nuclear-armed countries fight, if they fight a conventional war, there is every possibility that it is going to end up into nuclear war. The unthinkable."

"If say Pakistan, God forbid, we are fighting a conventional war, we are losing, and if a country is stuck between the choice: either you surrender or you fight 'til death for your freedom, I know Pakistanis will fight to death for their freedom. So when a nuclear-armed country fights to the end, to the death, it has consequences."

"So that's why we have approached the United Nations, we are approaching every international forum, that they must act right now because this is a potential disaster that would go way beyond the Indian subcontinent."

Until recently, Pakistan had made attempts to open dialogue with India "to live as civilised neighbours, to resolve our difference [over Kashmir] ... through a political settlement", but according to Khan, this is no longer the case.

"We discovered that while we were trying to have dialogue, they were trying to push us in the blacklist in FATF [Financial Action Task Force] ... If Pakistan is pushed into the blacklist of FATF that means there will be sanctions on Pakistan. So they were trying to bankrupt us economically, so that's when we pulled back. And that's when we realised that this government is on an agenda ... to push Pakistan to disaster," says Khan.

"There is no question of talking to the Indian government right now after they revoked this article 370 of their own constitution and they annexed Kashmir illegally against the UN Security Council resolution which had guaranteed the people that they would be able to hold a referendum, a plebiscite, to decide their destiny."

Khan has not only faced criticism about the country's ailing economy and his u-turns. Civil rights acitivists and journalists are saying that the space for dissent and freedom of expression has shrunk and that there was a crackdown against the media since he took office.

"This is utter and utter nonsense," Khan says. "Pakistan is one of the freest places in the world in media .... the freedom that journalists have in this country is unprecedented."

Asked about his government's achievements after its first year in office, Khan says: "We are already in a new Pakistan ... This government has done things which no government has done before. But, as they say, Rome was not built in a day. When you start making these massive changes, reforms, it takes time. The time to judge a government is five years ... The first year was the most difficult period, but from now onwards people will start seeing the difference ... the direction of the country is now right."



https://www.aljazeera.com/programme...nocide-kashmir-war-india-190913134545416.html

Loser mindset. Losing political capital to earn praises for himself.

 

[El Sidd]

He is not a Pacifists , he said he is going to make Pakistan Riyast-e-Medina , and Rasool Allah or Islam are not Pacifists, We believe in Defensive War, we won't start it but if someone threaten our homeland, our people , our way of Life and religion than its on ..

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Badr

educate yourself

 

[Psychic]

He also said if it comes to surrender or nukes he will go with nukes.

Fight has not started and he talks of surrender.