İn the İran-İraq war , İsrael sold weapons to İran
en.wikipedia.org
Isra"el" did not sell anything to Iran during the Iran-Iraq war. Only the Americans did. And that too because Iran forced them, after the CIA station chief was eliminated by pro-Iranian forces in Lebanon, and given that the same forces were holding multiple westerners captive.
VATICAN ( christian world ) and İran are allies against Islamic World since the 16th century
The Ottoman empire allied with Catholic France against Muslim Iran. A French military officer was even advising Ottomans on the frontlines.
İran never fought christian world and İsrael
only orthodox Russia attacked İran ....
Yes, Islam does not order us to wage offensive war against the "Christian world" as such and simply for the sake of it.
But Iran did fight Christian powers whenever there was a legitimate casus belli, ie when attacked, partially occupied or oppressed by them: Rome, Byzantine Empire, Portugal, Russia, USA. So the above quoted claim is incorrect.
Also in modern times, Russia is the only Christian state, along with Armenia, which Iran has shared a border with. Unlike the Ottoman empire, which was directly bordering major powerhouses of central Europe in addition to Russia. So the comparison is moot anyway.
When the Ottoman empire was experiencing serious, possibly existential threats at the hands of European powers in the 19th century, Iranian ulema issued fatwas in support of the Ottomans.
btw so-called muslim İran support christian Armenia against muslim Azerbaijan even both İran and Azerbaijan are Shia
"So-called" Muslim Iran? Careful not to slide into takfirism.
Iran fully supported Azarbaijan during the first Karabakh conflict. Trained their troops, even gave martyrs in the war. Ungrateful rulers in Baku however turned against Iran by hosting zionists and allowing them to operate against Iran from their soil.
İran use muslim-sectarian card to use Shia militias from İraq,Syria,Lebanon,Yemen,Afghanistan,Pakistan for Persian interests
Iran's policy goals are non-sectarian. Iran backed Sunni Muslims in Bosnia, Palestine, Kurdish regions of Iraq, Afghanistan during situations of war. And extended political support to innumerable Sunni Islamic movements across the globe since 1979.
Arabs,Pakistanis,Afghans died for Persian interests
For Islam.
USA , France ,Russia and İran always supported Armenia against Azerbaijan by military or political
iran supported christian Armenia against muslim Azerbaijan since 1990s
No, Iran supported Azarbaijan Republic. But was faced with ungrateful behaviour by the latter. Zionist propaganda notwithstanding.
Azerbaijan bought weapons from İsrael to protect itself and to save occupied lands by Armenia
now the strongest muslim powers Turkey and Pakistan protect Azerbaijan ... Nobody can touch Azerbaijan
The Baku regime is deeply zionist, its president leaves flowers at the foot of masonic monuments. The regime is serving Isra"el"'s agenda.
IRAN , ASSAD , HEZBOLAH have no balls to fight FSA
They are good in killing unarmed civilians with barrel bombs even chemical weapons
FSA easly kicked IRAN , ASSAD , HEZBOLAH combined .. and in 2015 ROUHANI asked helping from PUTIN
Russia entered Syria and saved pathetic IRAN , ASSAD , HEZBOLAH from FSA
First, it was not just the FSA but dozens of terrorist groups totaling hundreds of thousands of fighters, tens of thousands of volunteers from over 80 countries crossing the Turkish border into Syria, and all out support (weapons, logistics, intelligence, training, command) from practically the entire NATO plus all US client regimes of the region.
Second, despite this overwhelming backing they failed to defeat the Syrian government, never managed to topple it even before Russia entered the frame.
Third, even though it was suffering from a lack of precision guided weapons and even though most of the fighting took place in densely populated areas, the Syrian army's civilian to military kill ratio was about 1:1 according to pro-opposition sources such as the SOHR (meaning that it may even be lower than this in fact). Which is not indicative of a policy to wage war on civilians. Collateral damage, unfortunately, is inevitable in these sorts of conflicts.
or to liberate Southern Azerbaijan from Persian invasion
there are 35-40 million TURKS in İran
There are at most 18-20 million Turkish-speakers or descendants of Turkish-speakers in Iran, most of them from mixed linguistic backgrounds by the way. Who ethnically are Iranian, not Turkic.
Azarbaijan is an Iranian name (azar = fire, badegan = protected by), and it has been part of Iran for millennia. Azari Iranians themselves will crush any separatist fringe extremists at the slightest wrong move.
According to a modern etymology, the term Azerbaijan derives from that of Atropates,[33][34] a Persian[35][36] satrap under the Achaemenid Empire, who was later reinstated as the satrap of Media under Alexander the Great.[37][38] The original etymology of this name is thought to have its roots in the once-dominant Zoroastrianism. In the Avesta's Frawardin Yasht ("Hymn to the Guardian Angels"), there is a mention of âterepâtahe ashaonô fravashîm ýazamaide, which literally translates from Avestan as "we worship the fravashi of the holy Atropatene."[39] The name "Atropates" itself is the Greek transliteration of an Old Iranian, probably Median, compounded name with the meaning "Protected by the (Holy) Fire" or "The Land of the (Holy) Fire".[40] The Greek name was mentioned by Diodorus Siculus and Strabo. Over the span of millennia, the name evolved to Āturpātākān (Middle Persian), then to Ādharbādhagān, Ādharbāyagān, Āzarbāydjān (New Persian) and present-day Azerbaijan.[citation needed]
The name Azerbaijan was first adopted for the area of the present-day Republic of Azerbaijan by the government of Musavat in 1918,[41] after the collapse of the Russian Empire, when the independent Azerbaijan Democratic Republic was established. Until then, the designation had been used exclusively to identify the adjacent region of contemporary northwestern Iran,[42][43][44][45] while the area of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic was formerly referred to as Arran and Shirvan.[46] On that basis Iran protested the newly adopted country name.[47]
en.wikipedia.org
In fact, Azari Iranians cannot wait to teach the regime in Baku a lesson:
your weak-undeveloped İran could not stop Azerbaijan .. because this time regional super power Turkey entered the game in Karabakh
Azarbaijan Republic can't do a thing to Iran. It will get obliterated in a couple of days if it tries.
without Russia , İran is nothing in the region including Syria
Iran is the most influential player in the region. US- and zionist-client regimes can't compete. Their power is a mirage which merely exists by their imperial masters' grace.
Russia attempted to remove Hezbollah fighters from close to the border with occupied Palestine but failed.
- - - - - -
At least in case of Bosnia in the past and in Nigorno Karabagh the brotherly countries played their role to free the land.
Yes including Iran, which on the military level was the foremost backer of Sunni Muslim Bosnians during the war.
Iran sadly due to their own motives helped Armenia in the past and present despite the fact that media is full of pics where Armenians showed their hate for Islam by disgracing the Mosques in the area.
Iran assisted Azarbaijan Republic in the 1990's war. Sadly Baku resorted to dubious moves against Iran however.
Iran should end the sectarian hate and join hands with Turkey.
There's no sectarian hate among Iranian decision makers. Iran militarily backed Sunni Muslims in Palestine, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan. Look up Iranian discourse as well, it contains not a iota of sectarianist animosity.
By the way Irani Quds force may be used in Syria or other sectarian conflicts but cannot beat Israel.
The Syrian war wasn't sectarian in nature. Some 60%-70% of the Syrian armed forces consists of Sunni Muslims, President Al-Assad's wife is a Sunni Muslim, the merchant elites of Aleppo who are mostly loyal to the government are Sunni, the Sunni mufti of Damascus is loyal to the government, and so on.
- - - - - -
No,they did sell spare parts and ammunition to the Iranians. Because they saw Iraq as the lesser of two evils. It was all very subtle of course and through third parties.
Isra"el" didn't sell anything to Iran, the US did. And that too because Iran coerced Washington into this, given how pro-Iranian elements were holding in captivity dozens of western European and American citizens on top of eliminating the CIA's regional station chief.
That the US got the equipment from third parties does not imply that these suppliers initiated the whole thing or that they would have done the same if America hadn't solicited them to do so. Also, the reason the White House resorted to third parties was because it needed to cover the tracks of the deal, since it was a covert endeavour which Congress had not been informed of. 2500 TOW missiles (by comparison, Saudi Arabia purchased 13000 TOWs for Syrian rebels alone) and just 16 Hawk SAM's didn't make any difference to the outcome of the conflict anyway.
Iran was the bigger adversary to the zionists. Iran contrary to Iraq was not just supporting Palestinian Resistance factions but also actively fighting Isra"el" through Hezbollah in Lebanon. Isra"el""s Lebanese proxies from the Phalanges militia kidnapped Iran's military attaché Ahmad Motevaselian, along with three other Iranian diplomats in 1982 and transferred them to the zionists. They have been missing ever since.
en.wikipedia.org
- - - - -
Back then most of the Western bloc countries supported Iran as Iraq under Saddam regime was considered more Evil
The western block was behind Saddam. It was one of the very rare events if not the only one, where both east and west were aligned against a third party.
France sold top notch weaponry to Iraq during the war including Roland SAM's and non-downgraded Mirage F-1 fighter jets. Paris even put its French pilots at the disposal of Saddam (and indeed, many F-1 missions against Iran were flown by French pilots).
Furthermore western companies exported chemical precursors to Iraq, which formed the basis of Saddam's chemical weapons program. Even though it was known that Iraq was developing WMD, European regimes authorized these exports.
As for the US regime, it provided real time satellite imagery to Iraq. And, Washington vetoed a UNSC resolution meant to Iraq for its use of chemical weapons against Iranian troops and civilians. Last but not least, the US directly entered the war against Iran in 1988 - see Operation Praying Mantis and other similar American attacks against Iran in the Persian Gulf. US aggression against Iran culminated in the terrorist downing of an Iranian civilian airliner, Iran Air flight 655 in July 1988.
Rumsfeld officially meeting Saddam during the war:
