What's new

if you are Muslim see this video

sorry @Anonymous : when you say "defend" you mean defend against who ?

for nuclear weapon i never heard Turkey was interested.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
sorry @Anonymous : when you say "defend" you mean defend against who ?

for nuclear weapon i never heard Turkey was interested.

Against any act of aggression mainly from Russia. And no Turkey hinted that it may go nuclear, but yet this is remain to be seen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
sorry @Anonymous : when you say "defend" you mean defend against who ?

for nuclear weapon i never heard Turkey was interested.

Practically against Russia but if Turkey is attacked, it could ask NATO to intervene ( not in case turkey attacks someone).

Regarding Nukes, i was answering a hypothetical question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
True. If I may ask you a question, a little bit of topic, but, do you think Iran is a rational actor on world stage? And what do you think that KSA would do? A few weeks ago there was a hearing of the US military commission in congress, they stated that there is a still little bit of time to embrace politics with Iran, what do you think it's going to happen bro?

Iran is a perfectly rational actor, so is North Korea, in a sense that it along with its regime has survival instincts.

The problem that KSA will face against a Nuclear Iran would not be that they may Nuke KSA but that Iran would get emboldened under the protection of Nuclear umbrella and would be able to interfere in Shia majority areas of KSA along with Bahrain and fuel secessionist movements. Fear of violence in infinitely more useful than violence itself.

The physical aspect of Protecting KSA could be well looked after by Guarantees given by US or Pakistan(doubtful ) but no guarantee would be able to inhibit Iran from using proxies. ( as no one provide guarantee in case you go on offensive due to fear of escalation of commitment that could occur.).

The only response that KSA would have in that situation is to use proxies of it's own against Iranian pressure points and to invest in defensive technologies (which are very costly).

Iraq would also present a problem in case of nuclear Iran but could be managed.
 
. . . . .
iam a thrid party here so forgive me if iam wrong,so are u saying killing israelis(jews) will bring peace to hearts of muslims in palestine ,so whats the difference i think palestine needs a leader like gandhi or martin luther not a terrorists who kill jews,if gandhi can repell british empire with out firing a single bullet,then palestinians can also
The difference between Palestinians and Indians,Pakistani and Bangladeshi is;
They all were behind Ghandi one people.
Palestinians are to devided,no unity.
Killings will never help,live and let live but try telling that to them(all of the parties involved).
 
.
The difference between Palestinians and Indians,Pakistani and Bangladeshi is;
They all were behind Ghandi one people.
Palestinians are to devided,no unity.
Killings will never help,live and let live but try telling that to them(all of the parties involved).

Not to mention Hamas' approch, and the Likud nuts :)
 
.
turkey cannot destroy Israel and they dont have the balls
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom