What's new

If Mughals did not loot India, what exactly was their contribution to India?

Mughal not looted india they kept their wealth and that which is captured as a result of invasion within india unlike british who looted india and transfered all wealth of india to england and europe this is real difference, when ever Muslim capture region they treat it as their own but west never treat such invaded region as their own people but instead loot them and transfer their wealth to western countries
 
Not again.

There is no right or wrong. It is what it is that's all.
 
aj kal Tapal dana dar chai pi raha haan ...app sonayan Altaf bhai kia kar raha haan

Altaf Hussain sahab ajkal sasta rahe hain.... Unki Irani trained militia is still under hiding and waiting for the next batch of order.

Aap sunaen Faisal Raza Abidi kesa hai?
 
Altaf Hussain sahab ajkal sasta rahe hain.... Unki Irani trained militia is still under hiding and waiting for the next batch of order.

Aap sunaen Faisal Raza Abidi kesa hai?
vo jail ka maal ha... ap ko tu patta he haa... app ka payra Judge Ifitkhar Ch ka khilaf bol ka phas gaayaa.... hero bana ka chakar ma laaaaag gaee bara bara ..
 
vo jail ka maal ha... ap ko tu patta he haa... app ka payra Judge Ifitkhar Ch ka khilaf bol ka phas gaayaa.... hero bana ka chakar ma laaaaag gaee bara bara ..

wah wah kia khoob kaha hai
 
@Retired Troll Din-i-llahi was a Mughal contribution.

Their contributions are mainly in arts, development of Hindustani Music, Urdu language, Monuments and expansion of Sufi culture.

Otoh, Aurangazeb later went against most of it, expelled artists and musicians from his court thought of expanding his Kingdom, was intolerant towards other religions which eventually led to the decline of Mughal empire.
 
@Retired Troll Din-i-llahi was a Mughal contribution.

Their contributions are mainly in arts, development of Hindustani Music, Urdu language, Monuments and expansion of Sufi culture.

Otoh, Aurangazeb later went against most of it, expelled artists and musicians from his court thought of expanding his Kingdom, was intolerant towards other religions which eventually led to the decline of Mughal empire.

Honey Akbar was the perversion not Aurangzeb.

Aurangzeb only tried to save the empire using religion as a last resort. It went all downhill after that.

You are reading propaganda material and too out loud.

Question to you however is: Why is it relevant in 2019? Any chance you Moslem?
 
Back
Top Bottom