What's new

IAF to deomstrate gears up for Iorn First at Pokhran

Your entire history will be decimated by our Strategic Command Force if you decided to launch a nuclear strike on our soil...

We can do WHAT-EVER we want on OUR soil...Your forces must stay on THEIR soil...simple as that.

PS. indians would be the most retarded people if they decide to commit a nuclear-suicide over 1 brigade loss on enemy's territory or something...

first some background:

First India is not interested in launching or taking over Pakistan lands. India is much happy if Pakistan prospers and becomes like Canada and a prosperous and peaceful and friendly nation with open borders with India.:cheers:

India knows Pakistan can use tactical nukes on its army if it goes inside

Now to the main point,

So clearly If India do actually decide to go in and invade Pakistan lands then it means Pakistan has done something very very nasty which is NOT IGNORABLE (what it might be is anybody's guess). So Pakistan has already done something which India cannot ignore come what may. So India is left with no other option but to go inside.

Now when India would have decided to go in India would be fully ready to launch a counter nuclear strike. (whether full or partial or what doctrine will they follow is open to debate). But yes India would have a READY plan to Nuke back and it would be in a high state of readiness before Indian army enters Pakistan. India would have already decided what STEPS it would take in case of tactical nuke strike on its army.

Now if Pakistan launches a tactical nuke, it wont come as a surpirse to India as they would have already figured it out in their battle plan and they knew the risks beforehand. So if they decided to go in even after that, it clearly means they have taken that risk into account and have put in risk mitigation measures for it. It means they are ready to face the situation of being attacked by tactical nukes, and have put in counter measures to both AVOID/NULLIFY the Tactical nukes if possible, and if that fails and the tactical strike is a success, then also they have counter measures to deal with it.

But what Pakistan don't know is what would be the India's response and India's counter attack strategy if the Tactical Nuke strike is a success. Now that is a huge risk being taken by Pakistan armed forces. But using the tactical Nuke on India would ensure one thing - that India would have now ALL OPTIONS OPEN on the table and no body in the world is going to object to any option being used by India. I think this would leave India in a big advantage.

While India would have all options open, Pakistan would be left guessing the next Indian move. But rest assured that if Indian army do decide to go in to Pakistan, they definitely did not do so to stop in case of being attacked by a tactical nuke. If they planned to stop on being hit by a tactical nuke then there is no point in going in at the first place. So that means a successful tactical strike wont mean that India would cease war there. The only question would be what would be the response, but the war would continue. Tactical strike wont lead to ceasefire.

Another scenarios could be that India has its own tactical nukes. The armed forces would be suported by tactical nukes while they enter Pakistan. The major Pakistan Army installations would be the target of the Indian tactical nukes. Brahmos and Nirbhay can deliver the small yield weapons with great accuracy to any facility of PA. So when India sees its brigade being attacked by Tactical nukes, the response could well be use of same Tactical nukes on PA facilities and formations. So in all all the nukes land in Pakistan lands only (albeit low yield tactical ones and on military formations/facilities only). But in this scenario if both sides use the Tactical nukes against each other inside Pakistan only. I think IA would come out victorious without any doubt.

So these could be few of the possible responses by IA. But the planning would be done in advance to counter a tactical nuke strike inside Pakistan and suitable counter risk measures would be employed both before the strike and after the strike. Entering Pakistan would mean India would have accepted the possibility of Nasr attack buu they still decide to enter, because maybe Pakistan has done something which is absolutely beyond the red line. So at that POINT the Nasr wont stop the IA or the war. The war would continue beyond the use of Nasr (failed or successful).

If Nasr doesnt stop India from Indading Pakistan land at the FIRST PLACE (which means use of NASR is not required at all), then if India do enter Pakistan then use of NASR would not stop IA (which means even if NASR is used it will not stop the IA and NASR would be useless to stop the IA). So the deterrence of NASR may be useful but the use of NASR would be useless.
 
Iron fist Videos


MIG 21 Bombing


Bison


Sukhoi 30MKI


IRON FIST 2013 LOGO


Indian Airforce Helicopters


Pilateus


Garud Commandoes



Akash Ganga Soldiers

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NSG commando


Hercules 130 J paradrop


26 Bombs drone

watch


su 30 MKI solo

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Light combat chopper shows prowess in IAF exercise

Iron-Fist-2013-2.jpg


Indigenously built Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) has demonstrated its prowess in the ‘Iron Fist’ exercise of the Indian Air Force (IAF) at Pokhran in Rajasthan.

The prototype version of the state-run defence behemoth Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) was flown on Friday by its chief test pilot Wing Commodore (retired) Unni Pillai and group captain (retired) Hari Nair at Jaisalmer in the desert state.

“It is an honour to have made an imprint in the biggest exercise of the air force with the multirole LCH demonstrating its capability to operate in all-weather conditions for target detection and acquisition,” HAL chairman RK Tyagi said in a statement here on Saturday on return from the IAF strike show.

President Pranab Mukherjee, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Defence Minister AK Antony and other dignitaries watched the awesome manoeuvres of the IAF’s multiple platforms involving fighters, trainers, choppers and transport aircraft.

Fitted with advanced day and night sensors, including digital camera, forward looking infrared radiometer, laser designator and range finder, the combat variant of the company’s advanced light helicopter (ALH) Dhruv is armed with an array of long-reach weapons.

“The copter’s 20mm cannon with accuracy and high muzzle velocity are mounted on a chin turret and is slew able with either pilot’s helmet mounted sighting system, giving the capability to look and fire at targets around it,” Tyagi observed.

Designed, developed and produced for use in air defence against slow moving aerial targets by the Air Force and the Army, the LCH is capable of high altitude warfare.

Light combat chopper shows prowess in IAF exercise | idrw.org
 
Second strike against what?

Babur flies so low, and so stealthy, no known BMD or SAM can take it down...

Check USA's use of Tomahawk against Iraq's Saddam Hussein...
Tomahawk has same specs like Babur... No SAM of Iraqi Army could take it down.

What a kiddis comment..:rofl::rofl:

First of all Iraqi Army was not rag tag

Who cares if we dont have a decent SAM? Spada 2000 fits all roles for us...

Does India have a SAM or BMD that can take out Babur. Does any country in the WORLD have a SAM or BMD that can take out Babur? :disagree:

Yes, we hve lot of QRSAM to kick out Babur.:whistle:
 
OP should be jailed for passing on sensitive info about 'iron gist'.
 
Back
Top Bottom