knight11
BANNED
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
- Messages
- 1,572
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
1=> Yes of course. It's known, but the progress is not further the conceptual phase. And with the ER Barak 8 and 200km missiles of S400, it remains to be seen if we can allocate more money for yet the same category of SAM.
2=> AGAIN YES. And guess what we have already made significant progress in it. But range will not be satifactory, a range of ~900 km is what they are targeting. Although we had limited Anti Ship Ballistic missile capability in the form of Dhanush, which has proved its single digit accuracy.
3&4
Well all the above I agree.
But my only point was , what will be the SAM of Karmorta class, the list of ships being armed with Barak8 does not include it. Barak 1 will require adding extra guidance system.
So VL MICA may get the cut.
And my point is why going for Maitri which is nothing but the VL MICA, when it could be Spyder which is derived from Python 4 A2A missile which have active and long experience in palestine with the Akash FCR fitted over the T-72 hull thus playing the safe. Also believe me the French is asking for hell lot of Money for the joint development with no Indian inputs and denying the use of Trishul project as the base completely.
1. 200 km missile is the SAM derived from PDV.
2. Anti CBG will have range of 2000 KM. Dhanush is antiship ballastic missile, but no the hypersonic at the terminal phase to defeat the Battle Group air Defense.
3. SL SAM Maitri have been cancelled confirmed by IA in 2014 for good.
Question is not what we feels but what our decission makers feels and decide, thats why why don't they have any project like Aesa Survellance radar fitted over the tracked hull derived from the UTTAM Radar.
Last edited: