What's new

I consider India a global power: H.Clinton

s90

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
1,313
Reaction score
1
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke exclusively to Times Now Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami.

Q: It is interesting that today the mastermind of 26/11 was charge sheeted but the trial has not actually started are you concerned that trial has not started?

A: I am concerned if there is no trial and no justice for those who planned the attacks on Mumbai on 26/11. I am looking for a commitment from the countries and one that is carried forward. There must be reckoning of justice for those who have lost their lives.

Q: So, you believe that there must be a trial?

A: I believe there should be full whetting of what happened for those who planned the attack. Countries are now understanding that terrorism is a threat to the nation, I hope that we will see full cooperation of governments against these non-state actors. In this area (South Asia) there has been terrorism in every country, thus there should be sharing of workable intelligence between countries to prevent such acts.

Q: You have been asked about LeT and such groups that continue to act from Pakistan, would you put pressure using your influence to advise Pakistan to act against groups like LeT?

A: We have in our dialogue with Pakistan been very clear that it is imperative Pakistan has to go after every terror group. These groups are threats to Pakistan as well. These groups are no longer working alone, now they are part of a criminal syndicate. No terrorist group can be left alone, everyone must be acted against.

Q: Secretary would you link aid given to Pakistan to tangible action against terror which would also assure India?

A: I am very proud to be in India, to deepen and strengthen our relationship; I want your viewers to know we are always stressing the counter terrorism effort in every country.

Q: Secretary when they were worries that India was being clubbed with AFPAK countries, would you see India's role as regional power in the region?

A: I consider India not only a regional power but a global power. I think India has the opportunity to resolve problems regionally and work with other nations to solve some of the global challenges. How India decides to do that is upto India. Trying to bring the understanding that India has to the table to deal with the extremist threat in Afghanistan is useful. I think that cooperation that we are building with India on counter terrorism is very good, to get India's help in our side and in what Pakistan is now doing is very welcome.

Q. Do you see any resistance from Pakistan?

A: Over the last 6 months we have seen a evolving attitude in Pak, the Army effort in Buner and Swat have been adjudged by our military leaders to be sincere and committed, there is a attitude in Pakistan today that terrorists pose a threat to them that you can't turn a blind eye to terrorism.

Q: Recently meeting between India and Pak, consensus was that India has shown maturity in de-linking terror, would you believe that Pakistan should continue its fight against terror and not stop?

A: It should be expected, I see very positive steps, India is a mature country and is able to make decisions for itself, and India is also very powerful with military capacity, if necessary. What the government is doing is finding space to eradicate poverty, increase agriculture productivity, create more jobs, the bread and butter issue that will enable India to grow. I have great deal of admiration for the difficult decision that the Government has taken.

Q: On Kashmir India believes it is a bilateral issue. Pakistan would like to see the issue internationalized. Do you see a role for the US as broker?

A: The decision has to between India and Pakistan and it must take into account feelings of people of Kashmir. Our role is not be involved other than to support the process that Indian and Pakistan may decide to enter into.

Q: There were also concerns on nuke deal, is the deal conditional in any way linked to CTBT signing by India?

A: No, the civil nuke deal stands on its own merits, there are provisions which we are working to fulfill, what I am hoping in my conversation with the Indian leaders is that India can help us determine how to keep nuke material out of hands of rogue state and non-state actors hands, what is the appropriate non-proliferation programme for the future, India has capacity to determine where it wants to go in this particular case, the Prime Minister's envoy for non-proliferation had said India wants to contribute to solve problem, which I am interested in.

Nuke deal is not hostage, I was chair of the Indo-America caucus and worked hard for passage for nuke deal, I am committed to its full implementation, what we see as proliferation in place like North Korea and Iran the efforts of terrorist to get nukes, I want to explore what we can do to prevent that.

Q: You come back to India often, there seems to some special bond you share and that you are staying at Taj?

A: I chose to stay at Taj. I wanted to send message that I and my country is in solidarity with guest of Taj who were injured and people of Mumbai. Really as a rebuke to the terrorists who did not destroy the spirit, I am attracted to India, this is my fourth trip, something about dynamism of people, their dedication to democracy which is an inspiration to me. It is a feeling in my heart that makes me feel privileged to be here, I also love the food and I have many friends here.

We will come with the family to walk the street and spend time with people not on a busy schedule like this.

Q: We have seen you in many roles lawyer, first lady and now secretary of state, what next after a few years?

A: Retirement, but probably along lines of what we did I started out as advocate for women and children promote ideals of equality and opportunity be a voice of the voiceless. It's a great tragedy to see that there are people who could have been great doctors but never got educated and never got the chance, I would expand the opportunity for people to make decision that will contribute to the nation.
 
.
NOTHING NEW.... the clitons always had a thing for INDIA....even last time MR came along he loved india and sat in india for 7 days and visited pakistan for like 1 hour....


so yes this is expected of CLITONS
 
. .
If clinton went to pak,she would have said the same thing bout pak!!!
 
.
NOTHING NEW.... the clitons always had a thing for INDIA....even last time MR came along he loved india and sat in india for 7 days and visited pakistan for like 1 hour....


so yes this is expected of CLITONS

The views expressed are not her's or that of the " Clintons'.
 
.
If clinton went to pak,she would have said the same thing bout pak!!!

meh; these people are guarding their own interests; pakistan has already got a dose from their ALL WEATHER friend; now they're in the initial stages of screwing up the indians big time...
 
.
But you have not seen or heard, what has been asked by Hillary Clinton form India.

While ordinary indians savor on “global power” alias, US is pushing for followings:

  • Pressure on signing NPT
  • Guarantee on reprocessing American spent nuclear fuel
  • Pressure on to buy US plane and equipments for MRCA and other procurement program worth $30 billions.
  • Buying US reactors
  • End-use monitoring agreement on US defense equipment

Among other things….

As india has been propped up to be economic giant, US intend to fully milk that cash cow. If US can not then "strategic relation" and “global power” will have different meaning altogether.
 
.
meh; these people are guarding their own interests; pakistan has already got a dose from their ALL WEATHER friend; now they're in the initial stages of screwing up the indians big time...

Inspite of Islamic Invaders, UK, Pakistan, China, US & Other countries in Europe and North America having made there fair share of attempts at converting us, exploiting us, breaking us up, sanctioning us, restricting us and in general not cooperating with us, we Indians (all 1 billion plus) live under a single economy, common socio-political system, common legal & taxation system, common religion of tolerance and forbearance (a feat that even the most developed western civilizations are finding so hard to repeat) and already turned over one economic ideology of socialism after having fully understood its shortcomings and on to our second economic idea of libralisation which has yielded some impressive results for us.
Inspite of one of the lowest military budget (measured as percentage of GDP) and some pretty inefficient governance our military has kept the country a single safe union in one of the most toxic neighbourhoods.
Inspite of being one of the last to join the race for globalisation, we are the second fastest growing economy even in a recession (inspite of one of the smallest economic stimulus package as a percentage of GDP).
NOW DO YOU THINK US IS IN THE "initial stages of screwing up the indians big time".
Still do!!!!!!!

Ok lets see, :)
 
.
If clinton went to pak,she would have said the same thing bout pak!!!

Bye God you r right man . India should not trust America sweeet capsule. These people can never be friends of any one except one country .:whistle::whistle::whistle::whistle:
 
.
But you have not seen or heard, what has been asked by Hillary Clinton form India.

While ordinary indians savor on “global power” alias, US is pushing for followings:
Pressure on signing NPT

Any Govt. in India which want to sign NPT, it need 2/3 majority in parliament. So how much the US put pressure, it is not going to happen in next 5 years at least.

Guarantee on reprocessing American spent nuclear fuel
Don't worry India has allready signed nuclear agreement with Russia and France. We only need NSG waiver, which we got thanks to US.

Pressure on to buy US plane and equipments for MRCA and other procurement program worth $30 billions.
Where you got this $30 billions dear? The deal will be worth $10.5 or $11 billion. If India choose F-18, than it will not that bad a deal as it is the only fighter in MRCA which have a proven record.

Buying US reactors
Don't worry. India is also doing nuclear bussiness with France and Russia. US has even to sign a deal. Where work on reactors to be supplied by Russia and France has allready been started.

End-use monitoring agreement on US defense equipment
GoI is taking to US govt. for a treaty for this end user aggrement.

By saying so India should not put too much important on US and Britain. India should try to have great realtionship with Russia and France.
 
.
But you have not seen or heard, what has been asked by Hillary Clinton form India.

While ordinary indians savor on “global power” alias, US is pushing for followings:


  • [*]Pressure on signing NPT

    This is something which is not new .The pressure has been there all along , but i feel the time has long gone when any one country could have pressurised india. Pressure was there for ctbt when india conducted the test the first time and for both CTBT AND NPT when buddha smiled again in 1998 . The pressure exerted then is nothing compared to what it is now. Its ironic that the organization which came into existence after india conducted the test in 1974 gave it the status at the nuclear high table without signing NPT. The golden opportunity to coerce india into signing NPT was when the deal was being negotiated.Now, it is not going to happen .

    [*]Guarantee on reprocessing American spent nuclear fuel

    The terms of G8 are not binding on india . according to 123 agreement agreed with india , the US would allow India to reprocess spent fuel, provided it is under IAEA safeguards in the dedicated reprocessing facility that India has committed to build.

    Here's the deal: the Hyde Act allows India to access enrichment and reprocessing technology for use under three conditions — in a bilateral or multilateral facility, for a proliferation-free fuel supply system and if the US president certified that India would only use it for peaceful purposes

    According to Section 129 of the US Atomic Energy Act, India would be able to conclude a separate reprocessing technology agreement with the US to access such technology

    [*]Pressure on to buy US plane and equipments for MRCA and other procurement program worth $30 billions.

    Well it certainly wouldn't be a loss .. would it ???? F-16 or F-18 might have an old airframe but they aren't that bad .. are they?? especially with the most advanced config of those aircrafts on offer..we have to talk about overall package ..only EF comes close ..moreover the country's CAG isn't goin to spare the government if something lfishy comes up. CAG is doing its job as can be seen with numerous threads running to its findings .. the most recent one the russian missiles ..

    [*]Buying US reactors
    India might sign a deal with US on this hillary clinton's trip for the place where US companies can set up a plant... actually two.. but if you chek the archive the only countries with whom india have signed the maximum agreements ,for plant construction after NSG waiver, are AREVA(FRANCE ) and RUSSIA.. again GE isn't that bad a company .. is it.. even indian prime minister has conceded that with the effort US has put in getting this deal through it is only fair that they would get a part of the overall market.

    [*]End-use monitoring agreement on US defense equipment

This is nothing new and it is not india specific .. US signs this agreement with all the countries where they have sold or gifted their defence equipment including pakistan ,israel and UK . This is a part of US's whole defence structure.. only meant to stop the transfer of technology to a third country.. Which is only fair .otherwise you would have seen some pirated versions out there ..

Among other things….

As india has been propped up to be economic giant, US intend to fully milk that cash cow. If US can not then "strategic relation" and “global power” will have different meaning altogether.

Everyone wants to take a part in an emerging growth story .Especially when their own market isn't doing well ...Its just not india but the whole BRIC block... Tell me something aren't bangladesh , india ,china and pakistan looking for an export oppurtunity in US??.who was trying to milk whom then ??.. atleast before recession they were .. It is only fair that in the true world of globalisation everyone plays a fair game. and India was on the way of becoming a global power even before this " NATURAL STRATEGIC PARTNER" Relationship with US..
 
Last edited:
.
meh; these people are guarding their own interests; pakistan has already got a dose from their ALL WEATHER friend; now they're in the initial stages of screwing up the indians big time...

I also think that. But when it comes to America, India always takes the calculated approach.
 
.
hey shravan .. the world right now is a multipolar world. you have ample oppurtunities , friends, partners and even foes to choose from... dependence on a single country comes in when you are in trouble and want a way out .. india doesn't come in that category .. even pakistan if you see is diversifyin its options.. military and economic.. so i think the view of just one country SCREWING another country is a primitive one unless the latter is a failed state
 
.
hey shravan .. the world right now is a multipolar world. you have ample oppurtunities , friends, partners and even foes to choose from... dependence on a single country comes in when you are in trouble and want a way out .. india doesn't come in that category .. even pakistan if you see is diversifyin its options.. military and economic.. so i think the view of just one country SCREWING another country is a primitive one unless the latter is a failed state

Is taking calculated approach wrong ?
Below is a good example what i am trying to say.

---
PIB Press Release

On September 29, 2004, the United States imposed sanctions, pursuant to Section 2 & 3 of the Iran Proliferation Act of 2000 of the United States on fourteen entities, which included two Indian scientists, Dr. Y.S.R. Prasad and Dr. C. Surendar. Later, under the same provision of US law, on December 30, the United States imposed sanctions on nine foreign firms that included two Indian firms, Sabero Organics Gujarat Ltd and Sandhya Organics Ltd. The sanctions bar the US Government from doing business with these firms and persons, including providing assistance to them or permitting participation in US Government assistance programmes. They also prohibit all US Government sales of any item on the US munitions list, any defence article, defence services or design or construction services under the Arms Export Control Act of the United States. They also ban export licenses to sell dual-use items under the United States’ Export Administration Act of 1979 or the Export Administration Regulations, and suspend any existing licenses.

The Government of India issued statement through the MEA Spokesperson on both occasions; stating, in the case of atomic scientists, that we did not share the US assessment. One of the scientists Dr. C. Surendar had never visited Iran while in service or after his retirement. Dr. Y.S.R. Prasad had initially visited Iran under the aegis of the IAEA Technical Cooperation Programme. Thereafter, he provided consultancy on safety related aspect connected with the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant which is under IAEA safeguards. He had not visited Iran since mid-2003. The spokesperson also stated that no sale of materials, equipment and technologies was involved, no transfer of sensitive technology had taken place, Government of India’s commitment to prevent onward proliferation is second to none and our track record in this regard is well-known. With regard to the sanctions on the two Indian firms, the Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs stated that US actions were not justified as these entities had not acted in violation of our laws or regulations. The Government of India also took up the issue of sanctions with the US Government during bilateral interactions. These efforts resulted in the US Government announcement, through a Federal Register notification on December 30, 2005 that sanctions on Dr. C. Surendar had been withdrawn. Sanctions on Dr. Y.S.R. Prasad and the two Indian firms – Sabero Organics Gujarat Ltd and Sandhy Organics Ltd – have not been lifted. Government of India is continuing its efforts with the US Government.
 
.
As india has been propped up to be economic giant, US intend to fully milk that cash cow. Sure india will deploy its all famous deception and tricks to stave off american pressure.

IF US can not milk money out of "strategic partner" and "global power" then "strategic relation" and “global power” will have different meaning altogether.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom