What's new

I am NOT Charlie

I don't give a damn whether i'm Charlie or not but that doesn't change the fact that your comprehension skills are excessively pathetic:coffee:!!

It seems so your skills of reading a user name are also pathetic. First you adressed your point to Galad, now you are talking with other user. EOT.
 
Last edited:
.
Who care people kill each other over a 10 dollars bill, no one outrage over it. This incident will be forgotten by next week, many in the west will continue perceive Muslim as a barbaric religion.
 
.
Charlie is a hypocrite....
then why do radical muslims have to read it, discuss it, get offended, and the kill people..... Just dont read it, and you would be fine.

I like how the Indians are going crazy posting pictures and all . When in their own country hindu extremists couldn't tolerate a film and went crazy breaking down cinemas and forcing people not to watch the film. Hypocrisy is at its peak.
never endorsed their action either even though did not blow up people... did they now?
 
.
..and see nobody killed you.. even if you go out on streets of France , you wont get killed.
thats the difference between civilised people and muslims!!!

Je Suis Charlie!!
generalizing much?

Tasteless and offensive but yes. However, the corrupted Dos Equis ad is probably classed as commercial defamation and false advertising: you've corrupted someone else's creative commercial property to baselessly tar their product and thus damage the manufacturer. If widely disseminated you could be targeted with a civil suit: link
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
dude this is THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
 
. .
. .
thats not my point, my point is can you blame the extremist being extreme?

There are so much media mocking Islam and what not. It's not just Charlie-whatever.

Mr. Charbonnier did not fully understand the role he was playing.

Not to say that he should not have drawn cartoons mocking religions. However, had not been so narcissistic, he may well still be alive today, along with his colleagues.

Before embracing controversy, one has to think very carefully. Especially with madmen on the loose, and close to a troubled region who by the way will kill anyone who gets in the way of even the most minor sensibilities. A person radicalized cannot be reasoned with. Add that to high unemployment among France's Muslim population (10% is no peanuts) in an already depressed economic zone.

Who knows? Maybe Mr. Charbonnier was a radical too. The only difference being that those who murdered him were trained , radical killers.
 
.
My Dear Indian Friends, before poking fun on other religion and member, please remember you guys were abusing NY post and Singaporeans for a satire drawing on Indian Mars Mission :P

I'm referring tot his article -> New York Times apologizes over India's Mars Mission cartoon - The Times of India


So what?! What exactly do you want to prove with that ????


People exercised their right to criticize ! They argued like civilized people and did not went on a barbaric shooting spree....

I sorry but I cannot stand a stupid answer from a human

You are the only stupid one here.

They argued with words... they simply criticized the newspaper... WITH WORDS. And thats a fundamental right... they did not go and started to murder people like those disgusting dark age islamist animals who were sent to hell yesterday.
 
.
My Dear Indian Friends, before poking fun on other religion and member, please remember you guys were abusing NY post and Singaporeans for a satire drawing on Indian Mars Mission :P

I'm referring tot his article -> New York Times apologizes over India's Mars Mission cartoon - The Times of India

You are giving one example. I can give you many like printing Hindu Goddess's photos on Bikini, Under wear, Gods photos on beer bottles and a Muslim drew a naked photo of Goddess. Hindus were offended, true and they protested and some hard core even threatened the Muslim artist with legal action and he went to England out of fear, fear of being arrested not being killed. That's also true. But many Hindus also supported his free speech right and sided with him and successive Govts wanted him to come back. Out of fear he did not come and that's another matter.

But no body was killed and no body will be.
 
.
Look at this way, from the perspective of many people in the world (who arent Muslim) who embrace free speech and allow criticism of anything that is a choice.

Why should I restrain my free speech incase I offend people who believe some arab in the desert 1500 years ago riding around on his horse claimed he spoke to "god".

I respect free speech and its not even about the free speech with me, me personally, I wont outright attack a person based on their religion as I have respect for people but I can criticise parts of it or more importantly the great human ability to question, I wont say oh your a fucking idiot believing in that etc but I can say do you really abide by so and so, dont you think that doing so and so is wrong.

If people draw HIndu gods then Hindus are offended the same way I would be if someone offended a family member but to think of killing someone for that reason would surely be insane. There is plenty of condemnation and I dont know any muslims who agree with the recent attacks but none of them are disagreeing with talking bad about THEIR prophet if anything some of them are playing the victim. The prophet means nothing to me so why should I watch what I say, im born godless like every single animal on this planet, you make a choice to join a religion, in Islams case thats true in about 1% of its members, 99% have no say and are born into it.
 
.
They argued with words... they simply criticized the newspaper... WITH WORDS. And thats a fundamental right... they did not go and started to murder people like those disgusting dark age islamist animals who were sent to hell yesterday.

I dare you to openly claim in Canada that Holocaust is fake.
I date you to go to Harlem and say out loud "where are all the Nigars"

I dare Muslims to slaughter a Cow in front of a hindu RSS mob.

Are you going to deny all the rumors I heard about your mothers, can I explain them all, and off course in words only? forget about me sketching the positions
 
. . .
I dare you to openly claim in Canada that Holocaust is fake.
I date you to go to Harlem and say out loud "where are all the Nigars"

I dare Muslims to slaughter a Cow in front of a hindu RSS mob.

Are you going to deny all the rumors I heard about your mothers, can I explain them all, and off course in words only? forget about me sketching the positions

Are you kidding me? You are comparing criticizing a person who did use violence to force his religious views on others (Yes Muhamed during his conquests) with calling Afro American "niggers" and denying one of the worst human crimes?! :hitwall:

Pathetic....
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom