What's new

I am being hunted by Indian intelligence for telling the truth on Kashmir

BATMAN

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
29,895
Reaction score
-28
Country
Pakistan
Location
Switzerland
I am being hunted by Indian intelligence for telling the truth on Kashmir - The Comment Factory

“Dear Giorgiana,

I think your article has created ripples and has not gone well with the Intelligence Agencies of the Govt. So they are looking for you. C.I.D. department wants all your particulars. I am apprehensive they might frame you in some case or something. So it would be advisable to delay your visit. You don’t know the ways and the paths our police works on.”

I have received this email, amongst others, after an article appeared in the printed press and online, in which I wrote about the unlawful brutality of Indian Army troops in Kashmir. How interesting that I am being hounded like a criminal for reporting upon the criminal behaviour of the troops lording it over the Kashmir Valley. If the Indian Government had been instructing their troops to behave in accordance with moral standards of law enforcement then why have they sent their government monkeys out in search of me for reporting upon the reality of the situation?

I have been advised to lie low and not board any internal flights or do anything else that would involve showing my documents as I can expect to have drugs planted on my person at the airport or in my hotel room or some other such cheap trick characteristic of uncivilized countries. But I am staying in a hotel, and they do, of course, have a copy of my passport. As I lay in bed last night staring at the ceiling at 3 am with a head full of paranoid CID sleeplessness I vaguely considered procuring myself a dog or a husband or some other smelly aggressive entity as a protective measure. But I am not sure which option disgusted me more. Not normally given to fear, possibly the most repulsive realization is that I fell prey to it. After all, if the CID were clever enough to find me and stupid enough to do anything to me then they would have a few foreign embassies on their back given my multiple nationality status.Thank God I am not Kashmiri, and am therefore, probably, relatively safe.

But if the government has nothing to hide why have I had to go into hiding?

Ironically, I am presently living in an army cantonment area somewhere in India. It was my intention to try and speak to army officers here, in order to understand why the troops in Kashmir behave the way they do. However after having met a number of men with family histories of government army employment, I am even more shocked and perplexed. The army officers I have encountered here are amongst the most upright, morally laudable gentlemen I have ever met in my life. I have rarely, if ever, met men and boys of such upstanding manners and honourable comportment. When they talk to me they don’t even dare raise their eyes to look at me.

Whereas in Kashmir I was often prone to being followed by army officers hissing and clucking at me as if it were I who was the farm animal, rather than they. They’d often call repellently after me as I walked by, things like ‘Hey sexy, you are looking so hot in Indian dress. Hey sexy, Hey! Come back.’ If it was a group of them instead of just one, they would all start laughing thereafter. In Europe a man in uniform would get hauled before the courts for accosting a female in the street without just legal cause. But in Kashmir on many occasions over the past year I have been stopped in the street in a very formal manner by Indian army officers who start by asking for my name and passport, then my place of residence in Kashmir and invariably the questioning ends in queries as to my marital status. It becomes suddenly clear to me at this point that the reason I have been stopped is purely due to sexual motivation. A few times I have then found the same man lingering around outside my hotel for a few days. I had to change hotels twice last year before I learnt to simply keep walking when men in army uniform asked me to stop.

However here I am, being helped by Indian Army employees, instructing me as to how to avoid the trouble that I am facing from the government they work for but do not trust. I am receiving this kind treatment from army officers following an article , which they know I wrote, about what ‘pigs’ the Indian Army forces in Kashmir are. Clearly there is a vast schism between the bestial thugs sent to lord it over Kashmir and these decent individuals I find myself amongst here. One of them is trying to procure false documents for me as, apparently, if I am tracked down by the CID I can expect to be subjected to a nice dose of imprisonment full of rape and AIDS, after having some false crime hung around my neck.

The manager of my hotel keeps asking me if I want my sheets cleaned. Now I have never ever heard of anyone in India asking if you want clean sheets. Mostly they don’t use sheets and the ones you find on the beds of even the expensive hotels are usually dubiously littered with pubic hairs and a vague scent of vulgar perfume which you can assume to be the remnants of some rich businessman and his *****. Expensive hotels look cleaner but feel dirtier beneath the surface. This hotel I am staying in is relatively cheap and the manager’s insistence about coming into my room to change the sheets is making me increasingly paranoid. I keep wondering if I would find clean sheets (finally!) but also find something vaguely drug-like hidden under them. His peculiar sheet persistence keeps tempting/scaring me but I am not sure I am willing to risk my freedom for a couple of clean sheets.

Last night some English girl came up to me and asked if I wanted to go to a Sheesha bar with her and some friends. “Oh thank you,” I replied, “but I’m vegetarian”. She looked very perplexed and then explained that Sheesha bars are places where people smoke big pipes full of drugs. I had thought it was an abbreviation of sheesh kebab. I waited until she turned back to her friends and then quickly scuttled out of the restaurant. I am beginning to think that one of my professors back in Kashmir was right when, every time I got into trouble for saying or doing the wrong thing, he would tell me that he was not angry because it was just but because I was too innocent. I rather expect he will be feeling less indulgent now. My ‘innocence’ denotes that I never considered the trouble my previous article would cause the people who had housed me back in Kashmir and helped with my research project concerning a comparative study of Kashmir Mysticism, Shaivism, Buddhism, and Sufism.

If I am an innocent (albeit of idiot stock) then I would definitely say that some of the young army cadets I am meeting here exceed me in innocence (of the noble breed) by a long stretch. I cannot fathom a single one of these boys ever behaving in the way the troops do in Kashmir. Not even in ten years. I consider it a strict impossibility. I therefore finally understand at least one thing, that being the fact that Indians are always so unwilling to accept the possibility that their armed forces might be violating their rights of power in Kashmir. When the army is composed of boys like the ones I am presently meeting, and if I had never been to Kashmir, I too would have assumed that all the reports of unprovoked violence and rape by the forces was pure Kashmiri fabrication.

***

Strangely enough it was one of the young army cadets who raised the subject of rape with me here. Even more strange was the fact that he has Pandits in his family and yet he was still capable of viewing the Kashmir situation with equilateral appraisal. I asked him, the same as I ask all of them, how it is possible that the troops behave in that way in Kashmir when all the individuals I was meeting from army families here in this cantonement seem so very decent. I asked whether the forces sent to Kashmir were a totally separate breed, separately trained and instructed… I imagined them being the rejects, too mentally deficient to make it into the army proper, of intellect so low and bestial that it would be considered hazardous to their own health to be left alone in a room with a plastic fork, let alone let loose on an Indian State with batons and guns. Where in Hell are the Indian Government dredging up the thugs that they send off to Kashmir? Are they separately trained in the basics of moral codes of order in the line of law enforcement?

“No No, I don’t know actually. But you know it’s not that the men are different to us. It’s just the atmosphere in Kashmir that makes them act like that. If I have the freedom to go into peoples’ houses raping women ‘n all and not get in trouble for it of course I will do it, he na? It is the atmosphere. They can do what they want. Do you know how many women have been raped in Kashmir?”

“I know how many have been reported over the past twenty years,” I replied. “And I also know that in this part of the world that signifies that the actual number is probably twenty times higher. That makes for an awful lot of noughts.”

I am incapable of believing this boy’s opinion. I do not believe that it is possible for normal boys to turn rotten enough to rape women in villages, beat children in the streets, simply because of the prevalent conditions in Kashmir permitting them such bestial largesse. Truly I am utterly confused.

All I understand now is the reason why Indians are so unwilling to believe the truth about what their government is doing to Kashmir. They are incapable of believing it for the same reason that I am incapable of believing that the army men I am meeting here would ever be posted in Kashmir, or are even trained at the same base camps. The forces in Kashmir are clearly being allowed/instructed to behave in total contravention to all honourable codes of law enforcement. I will never begin to understand the reasons behind this because fortunately my brain is not sufficiently ****** to get to grips with the inner machinations of politics. But how can Kashmiris be expected to feel as if they are a part of India when they have never been treated as such? Is it any wonder that a growing number of Kashmir’s desperate and hopeless youth is being seduced by the dubious pro-Pakistan preachings of bearded wahabis veiling their politics beneath the mantle of religion?

People need to cling to something. It is hard to live without hope. India has never given Kashmiris any. No hope, no dignity and no respect. They have been pushed into a corner which is beginning to look like Pakistan. Thanks to India’s policy on Kashmir over the past twenty years, Kashmiris hate Indians, mistaking them for their government, and Indians think Kashmiris are just troublesome, stone pelters instead of seeing them simply as their brothers, in trouble.
 
.
.
I do not know if this is a genuine account or totally faked. There is at least some understanding of why an Indian, especially one with family and social links to the armed forces, finds it impossible to swallow the Munchausen stories that come out of blogs on Kashmir.




The other likelihood could be simply that like majority of Indians you are in DEEP DENIAL as to what is really happening in the KASHMIR VALLEY.:azn:
 
.
I watched Will Smith's "Enemy of the State" may be somebody wants to write the same in his words.
 
.
The other likelihood could be simply that like majority of Indians you are in DEEP DENIAL as to what is really happening in the KASHMIR VALLEY.:azn:

A possibility. Considering that since shifting base, I have been there almost every six weeks, it would be the kind of remark that comes from an idee fixe.

You can't have your cake and eat it, too, as far as the article is concerned.
 
.
.

No news is absolute truth...Every thing has a relative aspect..It is just a matter of how do you see it.....Before Kashmir has been invaded with Islamic Invaders, Hindu people are residing in Kashmir...Does that mean that we Hindus will claim that Kashmir is for Hindus and Muslim does not have right to stay in Kashmir?....So in the same context....Kashmir separatism could have drawn attention and sympathy from the world and Indian secular media if it has at least followed behind Yasin Mallick....He is the only separatist leader to whom I admire as a genuine leader....But rather than following Yasin Mallick...Kashmir separatism choose to follow LeT and Hizbul Mujahdeen.....The result of giving a separatist and potential genuine separatist movement turned in to a terrorist movement that causes a death of generation of youth in Kashmir....A potentially genuine seratist movement turned into another fundmentalist Islamic movement where Hindus are forcefully removed out of the valley.....


Every one in India knows that Army is doing a nasty job....But again in other side of the coin, we know that if Army is not there...the separastist element of Kashmir would have ransacked all GOV institution in Kashmir....So what can you expect in this situation....India can not and not in a situation to throw away Kashmir in any situation....A lot of water has already flown in the river Jhelum, the time when we felt that Kashmir will go away from India is gone...If any one does not beleive it, trust me, then he/she needs some help in making a reality check...
 
.
I do not know if this is a genuine account or totally faked. There is at least some understanding of why an Indian, especially one with family and social links to the armed forces, finds it impossible to swallow the Munchausen stories that come out of blogs on Kashmir.

She is not Pakistani... even if it is a blog, its based on real life experience.

And you dare deny the atrocities in Kashmir?

If you are so much army insider, than tell us how much army is posted in Kashmir?
 
.
This is as fake as that Christina palmer and ten other fake names used by ahmed qureishi and other Pakistani propagandists.

This giorgiana violante is a fake id used to post in all 4 posts on a free blog in 2010 and 2011 (where anyone can post) and then this great western reporter, just like Christina palmer has disappeared without a trace, no mention of her on the internet anywhere.

Another tell tale sign is the ridiculous offensive language used by the author - government monkeys - sure, that's how journalists report, in Rawalpindi maybe.

Its amazing that Pakistanis are so desperate they resort to such ridiculous propaganda, but whats funnier is that only they believe these fantasy stories of their own imagination.

Victims of their own propaganda, a sorrier picture could not be cut.
 
.
I do not know if this is a genuine account or totally faked. There is at least some understanding of why an Indian, especially one with family and social links to the armed forces, finds it impossible to swallow the Munchausen stories that come out of blogs on Kashmir.

blogs exist because your mighty democratic forces found it appropriate to ban international press from reporting there in the occupied territory

comes as no surprise really, but it's worthy of mention
 
.
She is not Pakistani... even if it is a blog, its based on real life experience.

And you dare deny the atrocities in Kashmir?

If you are so much army insider, than tell us how much army is posted in Kashmir?

Nobody said anything about 'her' being Pakistani; why is it anonymous, unattributed? What credibility does that have? Yes, I deny the atrocities in Kashmir, the way you and your kind have been reporting them.

As for the Army presence, there are three Army corps based in Kashmir, two facing Pakistan, one facing China. Do your own arithmetic. This is information in the public domain. While jockeying your abacus, you may find a huge gap between the usual crap about 700,000 Indian soldiers in Kashmir and the actual figure.

What does the number of soldiers posted in Kashmir have to do with anything I asked?

blogs exist because your mighty democratic forces found it appropriate to ban international press from reporting there in the occupied territory

comes as no surprise really, but it's worthy of mention

Do you also find it worthy of mention that it has happened now, on the 7th of July, a ban instituted by the state government, and never before? Certainly not at the time that this blog is supposed to have been written, unless it was written on the 7th and is being reproduced through time travel.

I wish you would examine your posts for the ridiculous content, before hitting the send button. It is embarrassing to point out such silly mistakes.
 
.
No news is absolute truth...Every thing has a relative aspect..It is just a matter of how do you see it.....Before Kashmir has been invaded with Islamic Invaders, Hindu people are residing in Kashmir...Does that mean that we Hindus will claim that Kashmir is for Hindus and Muslim does not have right to stay in Kashmir?....So in the same context....Kashmir separatism could have drawn attention and sympathy from the world and Indian secular media if it has at least followed behind Yasin Mallick....He is the only separatist leader to whom I admire as a genuine leader....But rather than following Yasin Mallick...Kashmir separatism choose to follow LeT and Hizbul Mujahdeen.....The result of giving a separatist and potential genuine separatist movement turned in to a terrorist movement that causes a death of generation of youth in Kashmir....A potentially genuine seratist movement turned into another fundmentalist Islamic movement where Hindus are forcefully removed out of the valley.....


Every one in India knows that Army is doing a nasty job....But again in other side of the coin, we know that if Army is not there...the separastist element of Kashmir would have ransacked all GOV institution in Kashmir....So what can you expect in this situation....India can not and not in a situation to throw away Kashmir in any situation....A lot of water has already flown in the river Jhelum, the time when we felt that Kashmir will go away from India is gone...If any one does not beleive it, trust me, then he/she needs some help in making a reality check...

Well said.

Kashmir from 1940s have been badly mishandled by all the main parties involved.

The worst aspect of it all is the displacement and persecution of both Muslims AND Hindu Kashmirs.

My heart goes out for the Kashmiri Pundits who have been forced out twice (1947-48, and then in 1990s).

If any one decide to leave home for better opportunities. Fine.

But no one should be forced out

and

then

kept out of the area of their forefathers.


Peace to all.
 
.
Do you also find it worthy of mention that it has happened now, on the 7th of July, a ban instituted by the state government, and never before? Certainly not at the time that this blog is supposed to have been written, unless it was written on the 7th and is being reproduced through time travel.

I wish you would examine your posts for the ridiculous content, before hitting the send button. It is embarrassing to point out such silly mistakes.

It may be you who finds 'silly mistakes' embarrassing. From getting your timing wrong (are you really former military?) to accusing others of peddling "ridiculous content"



A few excerpts from a 2010 US Dept. of State Report Regarding Human Rights Practices in india (and that too including iOK)

**full report available here --> 2010 Human Rights Reports: India **

Individuals could generally criticize the government publicly or privately without reprisal; however, on June 29, the Jammu and Kashmir government blocked SMS in North Kashmir and, on June 30, expanded its blockage to all parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Official justified the blockage as a measure to prevent "anti-national" elements and separatists from "misusing" the service. The ban was lifted on December 22.

In October law enforcement authorities began investigating writer and activist Arundhati Roy and four others for sedition regarding public comments they made regarding the status of Jammu and Kashmir. At year's end no charges had been filed against Roy or the others.


AM radio broadcasting remained a government monopoly. Private FM radio station ownership was legal, but licenses authorized only entertainment and educational content. With the exception of radio, foreign media generally operated freely. Widely distributed private satellite television provided competition for Doordarshan, the government-owned television network. There were allegations that the government network manipulated the news. Some privately owned satellite channels promoted the platforms of political parties their owners supported.

The Press Council, a statutory body of journalists, publishers, academics, and politicians with a government-appointed chairman, investigates what it considers irresponsible journalism and sets a self-regulated code of conduct for publishers. The code includes injunctions against publishing stories that might incite caste or communal violence. The council publicly criticized those it believed had broken the code.

On July 1, the Jammu and Kashmir government banned publication of three daily newspapers after allegations of inflammatory reporting. The ban was lifted on July 6.

On July 30, the Jammu and Kashmir government banned transmissions of two local television channels accused of broadcasting "provocative" telecasts and creating law and order problems. The channels allegedly violated the 1995 Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act and were restricted to broadcasting news for only 15 minutes at a predetermined time.

Journalists experienced violence and harassment as a result of their reporting during the year.

On January 7, police in Srinagar fired upon Amaan Farooq and Yawar Nazir after demanding the journalists cease photographing the scene following a battle between police and armed militants. Police assaulted three other journalists at the scene.

On March 3, unidentified men attacked the Mangalore offices of Kannada Prabha and New Indian Express, reportedly in response to an article written by Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen that argued against the wearing of the burqa. Protests against the publication allegedly led to street violence in Shimoga and Hassan that killed two persons.

On April 26, security forces in Srinagar beat Gowhar Bhat for covering a demonstration of the People's Democratic Party.

On July 12, the government refused to renew the work visa for Japan Broadcasting Corporation New Delhi bureau chief, Shogo Takahashi, purportedly due to his documentary programs that touched on the caste system.

Local media reported 12 attacks and six instances of intimidation against journalists in Orissa from January through July.

The central government banned some books from being imported or sold in the country because they contained material that government censors deemed inflammatory and apt to provoke communal or religious tensions.

Internet Freedom

There were some government restrictions on access to the Internet and reports that the government occasionally monitored users of digital media. A 2008 amendment to the Information Technology Act reinforced the government's power to block Internet sites and content, and it criminalized sending messages it deemed inflammatory or offensive. Both central and state governments have the power to issue directions for the interception, monitoring, or decryption of computer information. The Information Technology Ministry is responsible for enforcing the rules and regulations.

According to International Telecommunication Union statistics during the year, 6.9 percent of the country's inhabitants used the Internet. Lack of infrastructure limited public access to the Internet, but large segments of the population (706 million) had mobile phones and used SMS to send and receive information.



______________________________________________________


2010 BBC Report "Kashmiri Voices"


Excerpt:

Shams Irfan, freelance journalist, Pampore

Shams Irfan says the underlying anger is down to the unlawful and cruel Indian rule in Kashmir
I live in Pampore, a small town not far from Srinagar and famous for its saffron fields. Yesterday three people were killed by the police during protests against the desecration of the Koran.

I left my hometown to go to Delhi for work a couple of days ago, but when I spoke to my father on the phone I could hear gunfire. In the middle of our conversation, a shell landed close to our front door. My cousin was injured. Someone I have known since my childhood was also killed.

I am a journalist working for a weekly magazine. There have been huge restrictions on all Kashmiri media in the past few months. Our magazine was shut down again for two days.

They say the newspapers are creating the problems, but newspapers only tell the truth and that is what they don't want to hear.


We have to be careful not just about what we write in our articles, but also what we say on Facebook and other social networking sites. People have been rounded up by local security forces for saying things on Facebook.

Kashmiris are sentimental people. If anything happens around the world with the Koran - they will be against it.

But the underlying anger is really against the unlawful and cruel Indian rule that has been pushing the otherwise peaceful people of Kashmir towards such "violent" protests. It is against the unnecessary fortification of Kashmir by Indian troops that causes real friction.

Why do we need a one million-strong Indian army here? To fight against the estimated 500 active militants who haven't done anything major for the past three or four years? Those who get killed are not Pakistan-sponsored terrorists, they are normal people like you and me. They are not on the streets because some ****** in Pakistan is guiding them, they are out because they are fed up with the suffocating Indian rule.


BBC News - Kashmir voices: 'We are angry'
















p.s. and need I re-visit my point on INTERNATIONAL PRESS in occupied Kashmir?

Well said.

Kashmir from 1940s have been badly mishandled by all the main parties involved.

The worst aspect of it all is the displacement and persecution of both Muslims AND Hindu Kashmirs.

My heart goes out for the Kashmiri Pundits who have been forced out twice (1947-48, and then in 1990s).

If any one decide to leave home for better opportunities. Fine.

But no one should be forced out

and

then

kept out of the area of their forefathers.


Peace to all.


the "mass exodus" or "genocide" of pundits is something exaggerated by consecutive indian govts simply to try to justify their boots on the ground

i suggest you read this:


Kashmiri Pandits: Why we never fled Kashmir

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/kashmirtheforgottenconflict/2011/07/201176134818984961.html






p.s. isnt the influential Hurriyet Council vociferously in favour of re-integrating those pundits who did indeed face violence and persection?
 
.
I see that the problem is one of comprehension.

Individuals could generally criticize the government publicly or privately without reprisal; however, on June 29, the Jammu and Kashmir government blocked SMS in North Kashmir and, on June 30, expanded its blockage to all parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Official justified the blockage as a measure to prevent "anti-national" elements and separatists from "misusing" the service. The ban was lifted on December 22.

And this is what you call banning the international press?

In October law enforcement authorities began investigating writer and activist Arundhati Roy and four others for sedition regarding public comments they made regarding the status of Jammu and Kashmir. At year's end no charges had been filed against Roy or the others.


More bans on the international press, presumably?

AM radio broadcasting remained a government monopoly. Private FM radio station ownership was legal, but licenses authorized only entertainment and educational content.

There are two kinds of lies, suppressio veri and suggestio falsi. Congratulations on scoring on both.

AM is a state monopoly all over India. FM radio broadcasts are confined to entertainment and educational content all over India, not in Kashmir, as you insinuate.

With the exception of radio, foreign media generally operated freely.

Dear me. Forgot to cut it out before so bravely reprinting it?

Widely distributed private satellite television provided competition for Doordarshan, the government-owned television network. There were allegations that the government network manipulated the news. Some privately owned satellite channels promoted the platforms of political parties their owners supported.


The international press struggling against odds. Poor things.

The Press Council, a statutory body of journalists, publishers, academics, and politicians with a government-appointed chairman, investigates what it considers irresponsible journalism and sets a self-regulated code of conduct for publishers. The code includes injunctions against publishing stories that might incite caste or communal violence. The council publicly criticized those it believed had broken the code.

One of the villains of the piece.

On July 1, the Jammu and Kashmir government banned publication of three daily newspapers after allegations of inflammatory reporting. The ban was lifted on July 6.

Local rags. However, in your book, they presumably qualify as the 'international press'.

On July 30, the Jammu and Kashmir government banned transmissions of two local television channels accused of broadcasting "provocative" telecasts and creating law and order problems. The channels allegedly violated the 1995 Cable Television Network (Regulation) Act and were restricted to broadcasting news for only 15 minutes at a predetermined time.


More suppression of the international press.

Journalists experienced violence and harassment as a result of their reporting during the year.

On January 7, police in Srinagar fired upon Amaan Farooq and Yawar Nazir after demanding the journalists cease photographing the scene following a battle between police and armed militants. Police assaulted three other journalists at the scene.

The international press again. As Kashmir is foreign territory, there is some logic to a Pakistani point of view seeing Srinagar publications as international press, bizarre though the usage may be.

On March 3, unidentified men attacked the Mangalore offices of Kannada Prabha and New Indian Express, reportedly in response to an article written by Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen that argued against the wearing of the burqa. Protests against the publication allegedly led to street violence in Shimoga and Hassan that killed two persons.


Continuing struggle of the international press.

On April 26, security forces in Srinagar beat Gowhar Bhat for covering a demonstration of the People's Democratic Party.

On July 12, the government refused to renew the work visa for Japan Broadcasting Corporation New Delhi bureau chief, Shogo Takahashi, purportedly due to his documentary programs that touched on the caste system.


More blanket bans on the international press.

Local media reported 12 attacks and six instances of intimidation against journalists in Orissa from January through July.

Continuing the sorry tale of suppression of the international press in Kashmir.

The central government banned some books from being imported or sold in the country because they contained material that government censors deemed inflammatory and apt to provoke communal or religious tensions.


More bans on the international press.

Internet Freedom

There were some government restrictions on access to the Internet and reports that the government occasionally monitored users of digital media. A 2008 amendment to the Information Technology Act reinforced the government's power to block Internet sites and content, and it criminalized sending messages it deemed inflammatory or offensive. Both central and state governments have the power to issue directions for the interception, monitoring, or decryption of computer information. The Information Technology Ministry is responsible for enforcing the rules and regulations.

According to International Telecommunication Union statistics during the year, 6.9 percent of the country's inhabitants used the Internet. Lack of infrastructure limited public access to the Internet, but large segments of the population (706 million) had mobile phones and used SMS to send and receive information.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/kashmi...ence-telling-truth-kashmir.html#ixzz2YbKbOFgk

All in all, a masterly summoning of the evidence supporting the claim that the international press was banned. Apparently, from the wording, from the beginning of time, and who cares that it was from the 7th of July?
 
.
no i think there's an issue of jumping the guns...did you read the post in its entirety ;)

did you miss the point?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom