Robinhood Pandey
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2013
- Messages
- 5,580
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
i see it almost everyday . .Will visit Nampally and see the metro train this week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i see it almost everyday . .Will visit Nampally and see the metro train this week.
fantastic news! Look forward to a ride on next visit to Hyderabad
The rolling stock has been manufactured by Hyundai Rotem
L&T Hyderabad metro gets rail coaches from Hyundai-Rotem | Business Line
You have basically three Indias, stratified by money, and money only.
1/2 total population: extremely poor. That’s 500 million ppl. They squeak by somehow. Of that figure, some percentage (not really sure, I’m guessing maybe 15-20% or 75-100million ppl) are DIRT POOR. They don’t eat everyday. They may spend their entire lives browsing the public dumps for food and anything they can use at home or possibly resale.
That’s a staggering number, and more poverty than China. You may think Democracy and capitalism work better than communism and capitalism, but the experiment has already been done in India and China, and India (democracy) has lost. Capitalism will not do anything to change the poverty of these 500 million people. Why? It is not designed to, that’s why, and that is a pretty basic failure when it comes to a model on which to base an entire society.
About 450 million lower-, middle-, and upper-middle class. Yes they do the IT jobs and the service jobs (Hello, this is Krish, may I help you?) and the engineering jobs. There’s also a class that produces the arts (classical music and dance, and of course, all things Bollywood). They are not as wealthy as the tech and engineering billionaires, but they don’t have to be because those billionaires are their patrons.
Then there’s the superrich. They do what superrich people everywhere do, and are in fact better thought of as members of the global superrich society.
Yes, the caste system still exists, but in the final analysis, it’s the money that determines status.
But my point is, these are three totally different societies, even though they are all comprised of Indian people. I’d be very careful about lumping them together. My musician friends and associates are as far away from the impoverished India as I am sitting here in Seattle. In fact, they are closer to me culturally than they are to India’s poor.
You have basically three Indias, stratified by money, and money only.
1/2 total population: extremely poor. That’s 500 million ppl. They squeak by somehow. Of that figure, some percentage (not really sure, I’m guessing maybe 15-20% or 75-100million ppl) are DIRT POOR. They don’t eat everyday. They may spend their entire lives browsing the public dumps for food and anything they can use at home or possibly resale.
That’s a staggering number, and more poverty than China. You may think Democracy and capitalism work better than communism and capitalism, but the experiment has already been done in India and China, and India (democracy) has lost. Capitalism will not do anything to change the poverty of these 500 million people. Why? It is not designed to, that’s why, and that is a pretty basic failure when it comes to a model on which to base an entire society.
About 450 million lower-, middle-, and upper-middle class. Yes they do the IT jobs and the service jobs (Hello, this is Krish, may I help you?) and the engineering jobs. There’s also a class that produces the arts (classical music and dance, and of course, all things Bollywood). They are not as wealthy as the tech and engineering billionaires, but they don’t have to be because those billionaires are their patrons.
Then there’s the superrich. They do what superrich people everywhere do, and are in fact better thought of as members of the global superrich society.
Yes, the caste system still exists, but in the final analysis, it’s the money that determines status.
But my point is, these are three totally different societies, even though they are all comprised of Indian people. I’d be very careful about lumping them together. My musician friends and associates are as far away from the impoverished India as I am sitting here in Seattle. In fact, they are closer to me culturally than they are to India’s poor.
Have travelled on both Delhi and Mumbai Metro and i agree, Reliance took Mumbaikars for a ride. The rake and ride quality is markedly poor, here in Mumbai.Of all the metros in this country, Mumabians got fucked royally.. Thanks to Ambanis
Thanks to Chinese Metro TrainHave travelled on both Delhi and Mumbai Metro and i agree, Reliance took Mumbaikars for a ride. The rake and ride quality is markedly poor, here in Mumbai.
Have travelled on both Delhi and Mumbai Metro and i agree, Reliance took Mumbaikars for a ride. The rake and ride quality is markedly poor, here in Mumbai.
How many cities in India have metro now?
When Delhi metro was launched i was in awe of it and didnt think it would come to other places soon
Which proves one thing: The Lowest bidder isn't always the logical option.
I wonder if I'll get to work on a Metro Project.......