What's new

Humanity Assassinated: Ethnic Cleansing of Minorities in Bangladesh

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow!!

You didn't still answer why India armed and trained Shanti Bahini insurgents to start the insurgency at first place.

Now by minor I meant,when a hindu family is extorted it is minor.Even muslims are victims of extortion.But a religious angle is given to hindu victims to make it sound different.

Just like you gave color to the word minor and made it sound different.You must be working in some Indian daily.May be Anandabazar paper.

Playing around with words ...eh.....You should be thankful to India ...to help your country achieve Independence....I say Help...because most of the work was done by you guys...you guys earned freedom...and India helped you do that......:bounce:

You too give communal color to Indian Incidents.....and when you get taste of your own medicine...you are playing around......:pop:
 
.
We all can read here.No need to go high on your font size.

Still waiting for your answer on why India trained and armed Shanti Bahini to start insurgency.

I am yet to get an answer from you.

ONCE AGAIN, our Bangladeshi brother is DEFLECTING the topic by pointing fingers at INDIA

WATCH as he completely ignores the HEINIOUS ATROCITIES perpetrated by his government, army and people, and tries to shift the blame to India
 
.
10,000 incidents of minority repression in Bangladesh since 2001
[islamkristen] 10,000 incidents of minority repression in Bangladesh sin
The writer has forgotten to add that when minority repression is 10,000, the majority repression is more than 10,000,000. When the human rights groups start crying for tiny crimes against the minority, they just forget to weep for the heavy crimes against the majority.

Minorities can get rid of hooliganism by crying to a newspaper, but the majority cannot. In case of minority, hooliganism is called oppression, but it is called hooliganism when the majority is oppressed.
 
.
Bangladesh treatment of minorities sparks spat in Britain
Pseudo-Secularism
Thursday June 30, 11:30 AM
By Dipankar De Sarkar, Indo-Asian News Service

London, June 30 (IANS) An attempt to highlight the alleged persecution of religious minorities in Bangladesh has snowballed into a raging row, pitting two leading members of the House of Lords against Bangladeshi diplomats in London and an Islamic editor.

The spat arose from a conference on Bangladesh organised last week by a steering group patronised by Lord Navneet Dholakia, the Liberal Democrat leader in the House of Lords, and chaired by his party colleague, the veteran rights campaigner Lord Eric Avebury.

In an address to the House of Lords Tuesday, Lord Avebury accused the Bangladeshi High Commissioner in London, A.H. Mofazzal Karim, of lying and heckling at the July 17 event held at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.

According to Lord Avebury, the steering group invited the Bangladesh high commissioner and four other representatives of the government led by the Bangladesh National Party (BNP) to participate in the event titled "European Human Rights Conference on Bangladesh: Extremism, Intolerance and Violence".

Avebury informed the House of Lords that Karim was heckled when he claimed that there was no violation of human rights in Bangladesh; that many BNP MPs were assassinated during the 1996-2001 Awami League government; and that the rise of [the minority] Ahmadiya Muslims "was not so important because there were only a small number of them compared with the majority Sunni population".

"But, in spite of those provocative remarks, order was maintained by the chair and the high commissioner was allowed extra time to compensate for the interruptions," Lord Avebury said.

However, when a Bangladeshi government speaker exceeded his allotted 10 minutes and refused to obey the chair's ruling that he should sit down, "the high commissioner and his group - twice as many as the number that we had officially invited and in spite of being told in writing three times that we could not accept the additional nominations because of the limited capacity of the hall - created a disturbance and then walked out," Lord Avebury said.

"He (Karim) subsequently issued a false statement claiming that the meeting had broken up in disarray, when, in fact, it continued peacefully until 18:00 hours as scheduled."

"By walking out, the high commissioner's group forfeited the chance to participate in the afternoon workshops, which were very useful in focusing on particular aspects of the problem; namely, human rights in general, the persecution of minorities; the rise of religious extremism and the threat to secular democracy; and international aspects, including the role of donors and international NGOs," Lord Avebury added.

He accused the Bangladesh government of colluding with extremist groups in spite of repeated pleas by Britain, the US and the European Union and warned that the "bigotry and hatred" in Bangladesh, if allowed to fester, could spread to the rest of the world, including Britain.

Separately, Lord Dholakia was told by the editor of an Islamic affairs magazine that he was acting like "an Indian and yet more a Hindu communalist" after the Liberal Democrat leader raised the Bangladeshi human rights situation in the House of Lords.

In his speech, Lord Dholakia said religious persecution in Bangladesh against Hindu, Christian, Buddhist and Ahmadiya communities was having devastating effects on their freedom to practise their faith, damaging their culture and uprooting them from their place of birth.

"There are serious allegations that this is the direct result of the religious cleansing of indigenous Bangladeshi Hindus. Why is there a deafening silence from the authorities in Bangladesh?" Lord Dholakia asked in his speech, copies of which were emailed by him to London-based journalists.
 
.
The writer has forgotten to add that when minority repression is 10,000, the majority repression is more than 10,000,000. When the human rights groups start crying for tiny crimes against the minority, they just forget to weep for the heavy crimes against the majority.

Minorities can get rid of hooliganism by crying to a newspaper, but the majority cannot. In case of minority, hooliganism is called oppression, but it is called hooliganism when the majority is oppressed.

Include cases of Gujarat, and other anti-Indian and forget that. It looks if you cannot defend yourself, don't attack on others.
 
.
The writer has forgotten to add that when minority repression is 10,000, the majority repression is more than 10,000,000. When the human rights groups start crying for tiny crimes against the minority, they just forget to weep for the heavy crimes against the majority.

Minorities can get rid of hooliganism by crying to a newspaper, but the majority cannot. In case of minority, hooliganism is called oppression, but it is called hooliganism when the majority is oppressed
.

Wow.:woot:... Enlightenment:smitten:.....

I really wonder if you will remember this statement of yours...when you start So called Hindu India bashing.:hitwall:..Next time.....:pop:
 
.
Speaking out Makes of You a Target - Human Rights Defenders and Journalists at Risk
Speaking out Makes of You a Target - Human Rights Defenders and Journalists at Risk-FIDH > Human Rights for All / Les Droits de l'Homme pour Tous


The FIDH issues today a report on freedom of expression and association in Bangladesh, titled “Speaking out Makes of You a Target - Human Rights Defenders and Journalists at Risk”.

The report shows a pattern of grave violations of freedom of expression and association in Bangladesh. Those freedoms are arbitrarily restricted as soon as journalists, NGOs, academics, etc. cross the "red line"; sensitive issues are views perceived as inimical to the government, or information regarding political violence, minorities, religious groups or corruption.

Freedom of expression is restricted on politicized grounds on the basis of several pieces of stringent legislation. The public advertisement system and the control over the access to fair priced paper/newsprint for the media publications are used to financially pressurize media considered to be close to the opposition.

The very partisan public atmosphere prevailing in Bangladesh certainly does not help in this regard, as newspapers and media outlets (and this holds true of NGOs as well) are informally categorised as "pro-Awami" or "pro-BNP", making them easy targets when a government led by the opposing party takes power. Human Rights and development NGOs that are considered as "pro-Awami" are, under the current government, clearly targeted through lengthy checks and controls which do not result in any substantiated claim against the NGOs concerned. As a consequence, funding of a number of those NGOs has been blocked by the authorities, sometimes since more than two years. In that regard, some progress have been achieved in the first half of 2005 notably under international pressure.

Journalists are frequently threatened, intimidated or physically assaulted in the course of their work. There is a recent tendency among government representatives to belittle journalists in their public speeches, thereby denigrating them and exposing them to further harassment, including by non-State actors. In 2004, four journalists were killed in connection with their work. Attacks are often alleged to come from extremist Islamic groups; those attacks generally remain unpunished.

In addition, a number of human rights defenders were victims of judicial harassment, including arbitrary arrest, and those involved on women rights and the rights of minorities were particularly targeted.

The FIDH and the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders (a joint programme of FIDH and the World Organisation Against Torture - OMCT) issue a series of recommendations to the authorities of Bangladesh, notably:

* to put an end to any act of violence and any kind of harassment, including legal persecution, against journalists and human rights defenders
* to stop making public statements denigrating human rights defenders and journalists and, on the contrary, assert clearly and publicly that independent media, independent NGOs and a vibrant civil society are crucial elements of any democracy
* to enquire fully and independently into all allegations of attacks against human rights defenders and journalists, including when the alleged perpetrators are officials or non-State actors
* to screen the domestic legislation in order to bring it in conformity with the international human rights instruments binding on Bangladesh
* to establish the national human rights institution foreseen in the 1999 legislation
* to extend a standing invitation to the Thematic Special Procedures of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights
* to conform with UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders adopted by the UN General Assembly on 9th December 1998. “We hope that this report will contribute to a better understanding of the restrictions on freedom of expression and association in Bangladesh; we also hope that it will condone the development of a more favourable climate for civil society’s activities in Bangladesh”, concluded Sidiki Kaba, President of the FIDH.
 
.
The writer has forgotten to add that when minority repression is 10,000, the majority repression is more than 10,000,000. When the human rights groups start crying for tiny crimes against the minority, they just forget to weep for the heavy crimes against the majority.

Minorities can get rid of hooliganism by crying to a newspaper, but the majority cannot. In case of minority, hooliganism is called oppression, but it is called hooliganism when the majority is oppressed.
That is an astute observation I must say. I am impressed by your amazing power of observation.:tup:

Pity, when it comes to India, all these powers of observation take a vacation.:no:
 
Last edited:
.
Playing around with words ...eh.....You should be thankful to India ...to help your country achieve Independence....I say Help...because most of the work was done by you guys...you guys earned freedom...and India helped you do that......:bounce:

You too give communal color to Indian Incidents.....and when you get taste of your own medicine...you are playing around......:pop:

Show where I gave communal colors to India.Except one or two posts where I was sarcastic.But that's out of frustration.

I am grateful and thanks for saying you helped.
 
.
Self deleted: Duplicate post
 
Last edited:
.
Show where I gave communal colors to India.Except one or two posts where I was sarcastic.But that's out of frustration.

I am grateful and thanks for saying you helped.

If you are with Bangladesh, no one will have problem but when you are against India, you will have to justify. It's not you, but some BD members who have desire to put Anti-Indian Propaganda in the forum.
 
.
Show where I gave communal colors to India.Except one or two posts where I was sarcastic.But that's out of frustration.

I am grateful and thanks for saying you helped.

I like your honest appreciation of the history...:tup:.I may have made a wrong entry here.:tdown:..But every Bangladeshi Poster I see here has been busy ranting against India as we speak....:devil:.....

I appreciate you fighting for your country...and we have similar rights and Intentions.....we do not throw BS at Posters who do not throw BS at us......its mutual respect.....fair exchange.
 
.
Vanishing Minority Population

Hindus comprised nearly 30% of the total population in Bangladesh in 1947. After the exodus of minorities following the partition of India in 1947, the hindu population went down to about 22% by 1951. Due to unabated persecution, intimidation, and forcible conversion to Islam, the Hindu-Minority population kept on dwindling and now stands at a meager 10.5% of the total population in Bangladesh (1991 census).

Interesting to note that minority Muslim population in adjoining West Bengal (India) showed a positive growth rate and according to 1991 Census, stood at nearly 24% of the total population from only about 12% in 1947.

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/ethnic_clensing_Bangladesh.html
 
.
The Bangladeshi Government says it has taken all necessary steps to ensure the safety and security of the country's Hindu minority during next week's religious festival, the Durga Puja.

The assurances come amid reports of widespread violence against Hindus following the 1 October election in which the four-party alliance led by Prime Minister Khaleda Zia came into power.

The Durga Puja is the biggest annual religious festival of Bengali-speaking Hindus.

Many Hindu leaders in Bangladesh have said that there will be no celebrations this year during the festival.

Instead they will hold protest rallies throughout the country saying they were harassed and prevented them from casting votes during the election.

About ten per cent of Bangladesh's 130 million population are Hindus.

Christians and Buddhists constitute less than two per cent of the population.

Discrimination illegal

Although Bangladesh was founded as a secular republic in 1971, a new provision was added in the country's constitution by the former military ruler General Ershad in the 1980s in which Islam has been declared as state religion.

BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | Analysis: Fears of Bangladeshi Hindus
 
.
Bangladesh slammed for persecution of Hindus

The US Commission on International Religion Freedom slammed Bangladesh for continuing persecution of minority Hindus. It also urged the Bush administration to get Dhaka to ensure protection of religious freedom and minority rights before the next national elections in January.

In a new report titled 'Policy Focus on Bangladesh', released on Capitol Hill last week, the USCIRF, an independent, bipartisan federal agency funded by the US Congress, said that since its last election, 'Bangladesh has experienced growing violence by religious extremists, intensifying concerns expressed by the countries religious minorities'.

It noted that 'Hindus are particularly vulnerable in a period of rising violence and extremism, whether motivated by religious, political or criminal factors, or some combination'.

The commission, includes one South Asian American, former New York solicitor general Preeta Bansal, now an attorney with the New York-headquartered Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher and From.

'The position of Hindus has multiple disadvantages: perceived identification with India, an alleged preference for one of Bangladesh's two major political parties, and religious beliefs abhorred by Muslim fundamentalists', it noted.

The report said that in many instances, 'such violence appears aimed at encouraging Hindus to flee in order to seize their property in what is a desperately land-poor country'.

It recalled that during and immediately after Bangladesh's Parliamentary election in October 2001, 'there were numerous reports of illegal land seizures, arson, extortion, sexual assault, and intimidation of religious minority group members, particularly Hindus'.

The report, drawn up after commission members, including Bansal, visited Bangladesh, said that 'minority group representatives and human rights groups with whom the commission met ascribed these attacks to armed militant groups or to partisans of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, which is led by Prime Minister Khaleda Zia.

'As Hindus and other non-Muslims are popularly perceived to favor the Awami League, intimidating Hindu voters was viewed as a way to help to the BNP and its Islamic allies in the elections', it stated.

The Commission warned the lack of accountability for crimes reported against minority groups in the previous election promoted an atmosphere of impunity and for a renewal of violence against Hindus and other non-Muslims in the upcoming election.

It said that during meetings with the commission, Hindus said they feared political manipulation of voter registration process that could have them excluded from voter rolls. They said government representatives administering the process overlooked minority neighborhoods.

'Hindu leaders with whom the commission met also described problems their children faced in gaining access to religious education in their own religion, as is supposed to be the case in Bangladesh's public education system', the report said.

The commission urged the Bush administration to 'face up to the seriousness of the threat facing Bangladesh and to lead the international community in monitoring the January 2007 elections'.

It also called on Washington to urge Dhaka to prevent anti-minority violence during the election and to encourage the Bangladesh government to address religious extremism and violence.

The Hindu American Foundation applauded the report and commended the commission on the recommendations it submitted to the administration. The commission had invited the HAF as a respondent at a meeting it convened on Capital Hill to coincide with the report's release.

Ishani Chowdhury, HAF's executive director, told rediff.com the commission's policy brief reiterates the foundation's concern about the situation of the minority Hindus in Bangladesh.

She said the commission's report was in concert with the HAF's detailed report on human rights violations in Bangladesh against minority Hindus.

That report was released some months ago at a Capitol Hill event presided over by Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Republican, Florida [ Images ]), the co-chair of the Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Americans.

Chowdhury said it is imperative that steps be taken to protect the Hindu population, which has dropped from 30 percent of the population in 1947 to 9.6 percent now, and to ban discriminatory laws and practices.

"Our hope is that this message is carried forth and long-term action taken before it truly becomes too late," she said.

Recalling HAF's annual human rights report, Chowdhury said, "The low-scale religious cleansing of the already shrinking minority Hindu population in Bangladesh is of grave concern to not only the Hindu American Foundation but also to those who share the ethos of pluralism and tolerance."

During the forum, former Bangladeshi ambassador to the US Tariq Karim, now an adjunct professor at the University of Maryland, warned that the homogenous Bangladesh population, 96 percent of whom are ethnic Bengali speakers, are now deeply polarised because of the Islamisation of the polity, enabled and encouraged by the ruling BNP government as well as by previous military and quasi-military administrations.

He warned that what happens in Bangladesh in January 2007 would affect the Indian subcontinent in a major way.

Karim said that the proposed head of the caretaker government, which will assume office in end-October should step aside 'because he once served in the BNP' and, so, lacks credibility.

"Moreover, the BNP-led government deliberately raised the retirement age of high court justices from 65 to 67 years so that the current chief justice of the Supreme Court would become the chief adviser to the caretaker government," he said.

Karim said the secretariat of the Election Commission should be separated from the prime minister's office 'to restore the credibility of the Election Commission'.

Selig Harrison, director of the Asia Program at the Center for International Policy - a Washington-based think tank, said the 'unhealthy and dangerous influence of oil-money' being poured into Bangladesh had encouraged the collusion of government officials with Islamist groups and the Inter-Services Intelligence, Pakistan's intelligence agency.

He described the Election Commission as a farce and said it had already decided there would be 93 million voters, 13 million more than there are actual voting age citizens, in the upcoming election. "This will allow ballot-stuffing in a grand scale," he said.

He also pilloried the US Ambassador to Bangladesh, Patricia Butenis, for describing Bangladesh as a moderate Muslim state, saying this kind of praise seemed to endorse the BNP's lack of protection for minorities in the country and encouraged its strategy of working with extremist Islamist parties responsible for the persecution of minorities.

Cynthia Burton of the International Republican Institute said the two main political parties in Bangladesh, the BNP and the Awami League, were involved in a zero-sum game and, hence, not interested in changing the status quo in Bangladesh.

She said the core institutions in the country are weak and are being further undermined and destabilised by the present government.

Patrick Merloe of the National Democratic Institute said both the BNP and the Awami League's nomination process were 'driven by money and muscle power' and spoke of the abusive measures the police took to break up political rallies.

This hostility between the two parties, he said, 'has led to political instability', and added, 'neither party has encouraged constructive opposition'.

Bangladesh slammed for persecution of Hindus
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom