How will Nasr's Neutron warhead neutralize advancing enemy columns...

[Cool_Soldier]

These mini nuke stops Indian Army to stage a big war game against us.

 

[CriticalThinker02]

Its good for your own mind mastubation, but in reality you don't have the unlimited number of NASR aka Chinese M-20 and the Chinese TEL in your inventory, and unlimited number of Nuclear weapons in your inventory to be able to distroy the whole India. Our Nuclear policy is no first use policy, but it does not state that it will wait for the enemy to fire a nuclear weapon on us for the nuclear response, rather, if the country thinks that the enemy is planning to nuclear strike, the nuclear weapons would be released to neutralized the enemy, and since the enemy could retaliate, the nuclear strike will be hard and big to finish them.

P.S India is not a Russia, nor Pakistan is USA to have the number of nuclear weapons so powerful to distroy the whole earth 20 times, so can India survive without Delhi and Mumbai or can Pakistan survive without Lahore and Karachi.

You stated the obvious so I was only responding to your orgasms, both Pakistan and India would still be alive and kicking even after multiple of Nuclear strikes, go do some research as multiple nuclear ballistic type strike would only kill civilians and will not in anyway hamper the capabilities of repaying the favor, oh and btw no country on earth whether be USA or Russia has the capabilities of destroying Earth, they can change the landscape and the world as we know it but Earth as a planet would still live on.

First of all NASR is a Missile capable of carrying tactical warhead, that miniaturize nuke is ingeniously produced by Pakistan, secondly India's military is aka Russian made from your aircraft carriers to fighter jets so again stop having orgasms and at-least stop being made in Russia before you start pointing fingers at others, produce everything ingeniously like your Tejas which even after decades of research is still not mainstream.

We not only have NASR but other Nuclear weapons as well, you use yours in response and kill our civilians, we will do the same and kill yours, NASR would be used to wipe out your conventional forces where as Shaheen II and III would be used to repay your Agni, and some western countries actually believe we have more nukes than India so again we all know this so why state the obvious? and please stop having orgasms we also have nukes.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Enjoy...and have a positive discussion

The right question would be " How would Pakistan Nuke its own land and make it inhabitable?"

 

[CriticalThinker02]

The right question would be " How would Pakistan Nuke its own land and make it inhabitable?"

Watch the video again, NASR has already been tested on Pakistani soil, the region does not become inhabitable and humans can live again in that area after use.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Watch the video again, NASR has already been tested on Pakistani soil, the region does not become inhabitable and humans can live again in that area after use.

The NASR Missile has been tested... Nuclear warheads have not been tested ... the only tests that have been conducted on the so called Miniaturized nuclear bombs have been done in Controlled conditions in laboratory.... Are you guys so naive...

 

[Paksanity]

They aren´t.

They were successful in saving European behinds from Soviet tanks, weren't they?

You have a gargantuan danger of islamists gaining acess to those weapons.

No. Far from it. Terrorists have lost the capacity to mount organised attacks on military targets. Pakistan's nuclear security is better than India's. There is a greater chance of an RSS sympathiser stealing Indian nukes and launching at Pakistan. You know the hate and insanity that prevails there.

Do you have institutions in Pakistan that could even stop a democratic elected government to have acess to those weapons?

Trust me my friend, those 'democratic elected' governments can't be burdened with such responsibilities. World is much better place without that.

The right question would be " How would Pakistan Nuke its own land and make it inhabitable?"

By pressing the 'fire' button. Duh!

 

[Gufi]

No.. By your retarded logic, Pakistan is the land of tall, light skinned people (which somehow is a special attribute... And that makes you guys racist)

We are a country of different races and cultures, but not idiots. We are a nation without total idiots who can not understand basic military strategies and we are not idiots who underestimate our enemies. We are not idiots, and that is why we are proud to be Pakistani.
Retarded logics can be seen here, first go fix your nation then go examining ours. Go sit with an untouchable and have lunch maybe, feed some of those poor people, stop the hate speech by your elected officials. You want Pakistan to control its civilians, and you can not control your leaders. Retarded logic isn't it....

I can only imagine the ostracization Sindhis, Baloch must be feeling in your country just on the basis of skin color.

oh yes we torture the Baloch and they can never get on this forum, right @DESERT FIGHTER

 

[باپ]

The NASR Missile has been tested... Nuclear warheads have not been tested ... the only tests that have been conducted on the so called Miniaturized nuclear bombs have been done in Controlled conditions in laboratory.... Are you guys so naive...

The design uses a very small Plutonium fission trigger enveloped with tritium or lithium fusion shell. Most of the neutrons come from fusion and fusion doesn't produce any residual radioactive materials. The trigger Plutonium core does produce radioactive residues but it's in small quantity and get dissipated on large area,so as to keep radiation levels within tolerable levels .

 

[Gufi]

The NASR Missile has been tested... Nuclear warheads have not been tested ... the only tests that have been conducted on the so called Miniaturized nuclear bombs have been done in Controlled conditions in laboratory.... Are you guys so naive...

we are okay with firing it, tested or not on your soldiers. we trust our scientists did an okay job, and if not we can just go ballistic... Loool go ballistic got the pun there... really smart observation from an orange... So does any new type of nuclear weapon need to be tested in real world settings to know how it would work. please do test some in India, and tell us how many die... use real people and see how it goes... Cuz we are happy working in labs and making deductions from there orange.....

The design uses a very small Plutonium fission trigger enveloped with tritium or lithium fusion shell. Most of the neutrons come from fusion and fusion doesn't produce any residual radioactive materials. The trigger Plutonium core does produce radioactive residues but it's in small quantity and get dissipated on large area,so as to keep radiation levels within tolerable levels .

there is no tolerable levels, this will make India angry and want a nuclear war and we will reply with our own salvo of nuclear weapons and boom... MAD.....
Better India not attack us, that is why this is a deterrent with a lower threshold. Less chance of any war because a small war could break out into MAD....

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

we are okay with firing it, tested or not on your soldiers. we trust our scientists did an okay job, and if not we can just go ballistic... Loool go ballistic got the pun there... really smart observation from an orange... So does any new type of nuclear weapon need to be tested in real world settings to know how it would work. please do test some in India, and tell us how many die... use real people and see how it goes... Cuz we are happy working in labs and making deductions from there orange.....

Resorting to personal attacks.. means the truth just hurt the raw nerve... but for the sake of discussion.. have you nuclear Yahoos thought of the after effects... you might kill a 1000 Indian soldiers..in a city like Lahore.. I say Lahore because its the first city Indian forces might reach in the shortest time like we did in 1965.... but how many Pakistani lives are you willing to give up? Nuke Lahore and kill may be a million Pakistanis ....

 

[باپ]

we are okay with firing it, tested or not on your soldiers. we trust our scientists did an okay job, and if not we can just go ballistic... Loool go ballistic got the pun there... really smart observation from an orange... So does any new type of nuclear weapon need to be tested in real world settings to know how it would work. please do test some in India, and tell us how many die... use real people and see how it goes... Cuz we are happy working in labs and making deductions from there orange.....


there is no tolerable levels, this will make India angry and want a nuclear war and we will reply with our own salvo of nuclear weapons and boom... MAD.....
Better India not attack us, that is why this is a deterrent with a lower threshold. Less chance of any war because a small war could break out into MAD....

And the internet machoism continues.
First Nasr isn't a WMD as it doesn't cause widespread destruction, hardly any. It isn't designed to destroy or kill in numbers, but disable.
The blast wave or pressure wave isn't strong enough to destroy many thanks, but the neutron burst is very powerful. Enough to make humans radiation sick in a radius of a mile or two per nasr missile. There won't be any evaporated tanks as Nasr will be air burst for maximum coverage. Tanks are shielded from sides, but not much from top and that's from where neutrons will penetrate and radiation sicken the crew.
For making a batallion or two radiation sick without necessarily killing them on the spot, if India wants to start a nuclear Armageddon, that's their choice and Pakistan can respond.
By tolerable radiation I meant medically tolerable. Since the missile will be used on Pakistani soil. The design uses minimal fission material, mostly fusion.

 

[Gufi]

Resorting to personal attacks.. means the truth just hurt the raw nerve... but for the sake of discussion.. have you nuclear Yahoos thought of the after effects... you might kill a 1000 Indian soldiers..in a city like Lahore.. I say Lahore because its the first city Indian forces might reach in the shortest time like we did in 1965.... but how many Pakistani lives are you willing to give up? Nuke Lahore and kill may be a million Pakistanis ....

It is a moot point, Indian doctrine will force it to attack Pakistan with its retaliation, at which time Pakistan will also fire its Nuclear weapons. The air will be full of Ballistic missile launches and that will be end of the region.
That is why we want no war, not no nuclear war, but no war. The idiocy of your post was such that it could not be answered seriously. What answer do you want when we say it is a tested method and we know what we are doing. You argue and I remind you that weapons are not all tested against people or actually field tested but once a concept is clear, you go with lab work. Radiation levels are measured and their after effects noted.

First Nasr isn't a WMD as it doesn't cause widespread destruction, hardly any. It isn't designed to destroy or kill in numbers, but disable.

Indian doctrine, not macho ism which dictates any use of WMD, of any size will get a disproportionate answer from India which will break down into MAD.

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

It is a moot point, Indian doctrine will force it to attack Pakistan with its retaliation, at which time Pakistan will also fire its Nuclear weapons. The air will be full of Ballistic missile launches and that will be end of the region.
That is why we want no war, not no nuclear war, but no war. The idiocy of your post was such that it could not be answered seriously. What answer do you want when we say it is a tested method and we know what we are doing. You argue and I remind you that weapons are not all tested against people or actually field tested but once a concept is clear, you go with lab work. Radiation levels are measured and their after effects noted.

Yeh baat.... There goes Yahoooism out of the window... thats' what I am trying to tell some yahoos here ... Firing Nuclear Missiles is not a joke... Pakistan might be able to fire Nuclear Missiles to 3 or may 4 Indian locations... that will still leave of lot of India.. but India fires a few, there might be no Pakistan left... Any Nuclear idea that has been fed into a yahoo's head is good for a wet dream.. nothing much....

Indian doctrine, not macho ism which dictates any use of WMD, of any size will get a disproportionate answer from India which will break down into MAD.

Let me give you a breaking news... there is a discussion doing rounds in Defence corridors of India for India to give up No first strike Nuclear policy.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/repor...ia-s-nuclear-doctrine-experts-tell-pm-2207513

 

[Sinnerman108]

Enjoy...and have a positive discussion

Isn't there a little too much information in it ?

anyway it seems we learned well from the Americans.

 

[NKVD]

we are okay with firing it, tested or not on your soldiers. we trust our scientists did an okay job, and if not we can just go ballistic... Loool go ballistic got the pun there... really smart observation from an orange... So does any new type of nuclear weapon need to be tested in real world settings to know how it would work. please do test some in India, and tell us how many die... use real people and see how it goes... Cuz we are happy working in labs and making deductions from there orange.....

These So called Tactical arms will be the First One Which Will Be taken Out in war . Whenever Any army Invades the First strategy will Be Always To destroy Enemy Defenses May it Ground Or SEAD

Nasr Batteries has 60 Km Limited Range They Easy target For MBRL & Tactical arms Like Brahmos & Prahaar,Smerch ,Pinaka or Any Stand-off in CAS

Always Remember India will Always Out number the Ratio 5:1 there will Be always Be 5 Batteries of Tactical Arms Against 1 batteries of Nasr or babur to count In

The High Radiation Emission Makes this Weapon Vulnerable To Anti-Radiation Stand-offs they will be easily Picked up By Military recon Surveillance Satellite's