Try Chernobyl.. People are still suffering.. You gave the examples of Nagasaki & Hiroshima.. The nukes used on those cities were nothing compared to the ones produced today... And despite that little & fat boy killed millions and the people (probably the 3rd or 4th generation) is still suffering the consequences ..
http://k1project.org/explore-health/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-the-long-term-health-effects
Gud luck !
Yes, 31 people have died due to Chernobyl. You should think before yapping.
Do you somehow thing that the yields of our nukes are too less and that somehow we will miraculously only target Mumbai and the effects of high yield nukes will disappear in a jiffy?
The physics is the same regardless of the yield of the bomb. The bigger the bomb, bigger the damage, more is the money and manpower required to cleanup and rebuild.
How many nukes do you think Pak needs to destroy India?
I should say about 30000 to 40000.
BMD? Lol.. Do you seriously believe that an unproven "under development" BMD "shield " will be deployed all over India ?
Yes. It will be deployed all over India. Billions will be spent on it.
And that somehow Pak will not or isn't modifying its missiles to screw your BMD? And that in the most of war when thousands or hundreds of smart missiles are being exchanged you will somehow escaped unhurt?
You are confusing hurting with rebuilding. I didn't say we won't get hurt, I'm saying we can rebuild whatever damage you inflict.
Rebuild with what? When hundreds of millions in your people will be turned into dust? Your land,water etc become radioactive ? And the survivors die a slow and painful death?
Read up on nuclear war.
It's called MAD doctrine for a fukin reason..
That's between US and Russia who have tens of thousands of nukes each.
Once the nuke exchange starts .. You kiss your smart Arse good bye.
No, I live outside most of the blast areas. I'll survive the nukes.
That's what illiterate internet warriors and armchair generals say or clowns like Parikar babble to appease Jantaa, but the more knowledgeable Indian military who actually knows about nuclear weapons may have different ideas.
MAD or mutually assured destruction is a doomsday scenario which only applies if you are sure of your own destruction, so you make sure that before you go into oblivion you destroy those who are about to or destroying you. That applies in cases of total destruction.
Nasr isn't a weapon of total destruction and unless India is mad as in crazy, the MAD scenario doesn't apply on nasr.
Read up on MAD.
You use Nasr on Indian troops, we use thermonuclear weapons on Pak cities. Please keep it simple. This is the result of Nasr. Our govt has confirmed this.
These tactical or smart nukes serve more purpose against Indian hardened targets, like their Airbases, Naval dockyards, command and control. Mated with air launch RAAD or ground based Babur missile, it only takes one strike to make short work of prime Indians military assets hundred of kilometers away from Pakistani border. This all can be done, without breaching the strategic threshold. In fog of war its very hard to establish as to what was used on the Indian military asset as oppose to the full fledge nuclear strikes on Indian population centers.
Such nukes are called strategic nukes, not tactical.
Tactical nukes are used for battle.
And despite that little & fat boy killed millions and the people (probably the 3rd or 4th generation) is still suffering the consequences ..
It's Little Boy and Fat Man.
Little Boy killed 90,000 people, not millions. Hiroshima's total population was 150,000 before the bomb was dropped. 90,000 people died. The population of Hiroshima 1 year after the bomb dropped was 165,000. Today it is over a million. So what did that bomb do in the long run? Absolutely nothing.
When it comes to Chernobyl, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, researchers are still not sure about the long term effects of the radiation, that is genetic defects passed on to children. Too much Hollywood is bad for you.
