How to Overtake the Indian Armour ?

[Zarvan]

India will only attack Pakistan terror groups if another 26/11 takes place

And you think we will not hit back sorry Sir we will hit back really very hard

 

[wind]

No we coulden't we lacked the capabiltiies at the time


India goes for 'urgent' purchase of anti-tank missiles - Times Of India

What makes the difference now?

 

[Zarvan]

Our war was never with the Pakistani state or it's people it was a war with jihadi groups like LET. If we attack it will be in Pakistani held Kashmir where the militant camps are located.

And What makes you think we will not bomb your bases in Kashmir occupied by you ?

 

[LiberalAtheist]

Nasr can be intercepted by our mobile Akash systems easily as for Babur and Raad the Barak-8 missile has the capability to track and intercept low flying cruise missiles that is not a threat besides you think we won't bomb your nuclear sites before you can even use them? we already have pre determined targets we know where your missile bases and nukes are located all we have to do is carpet bomb them our spy satellites are getting us IMINT of your strategic targets.

 

[Zarvan]

Pakistan Should increase its TANKS Artillery and MRLS and also attack Helicopters to respond to Indian Attack and or any other funny adventure

---------- Post added at 10:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 AM ----------

Nasr can be intercepted by our mobile Akash systems easily as for Babur and Raad the Barak-8 missile has the capability to track and intercept low flying cruise missiles that is not a threat besides you think we won't bomb your nuclear sites before you can even use them? we already have pre determined targets we know where your missile bases and nukes are located all we have to do is carpet bomb them our spy satellites are getting us IMINT of your strategic targets.

We will see in the battle field you think we will fire one cruise missile at a time and even one won't be detected

 

[Nelson]

And you think we will not hit back sorry Sir we will hit back really very hard

I'm wondering why you don't hit US back when they are bombing terror groups in pakistan. money?

 

[LiberalAtheist]

Pakistan Should increase its TANKS Artillery and MRLS and also attack Helicopters to respond to Indian Attack and or any other funny adventure

---------- Post added at 10:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 AM ----------


We will see in the battle field you think we will fire one cruise missile at a time and even one won't be detected

you think that tank columns and infantry divisions travel with out mobile SAM's? get real this isn't WW1 modern warfare has been the foundation of all countries with high defense budgets.

 

[ares]

Original article is pile fanboy hubris...and the most amazing is this line.

"
The Nasr Missile has a range of 60 Kms and The diameter of the Nasr suggests that it is designed to carry a tactical nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 kg."

Nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 Kg ..really??!!

Looks like Pakistanis can carry their nuclear warheads in their pant's pockets!!

 

[Zarvan]

I'm wondering why you don't hit US back when they are bombing terror groups in pakistan. money?

Sir that is exactly my point you are not USA you are India and if you will strike Army will hit you back with all the latest weapons and they want you make that mistake because it will improve their image to a great extent

---------- Post added at 10:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:25 AM ----------

you think that tank columns and infantry divisions travel with out mobile SAM's? get real this isn't WW1 modern warfare has been the foundation of all countries with high defense budgets.

Sir than Plz Go ahead we are waiting for 3 years you make this mistake and than we respond INSHALLAH

 

[Novice09]

Most of the indian armor thrusts would be probably in the deserts of southern Punjab and northern sindh.

Hmmm an ideal location for using nukes.

Look what I have... Nuke... and you don't have that... I can use it but you can't... have a break...

The success of an attack lays in the swiftness, accuracy, good and precies intell inputs of targets, caught your opponent unaware etc... you cannot say -"if you will fire babur, i'll fire nirbhay or Brahmos. and vice versa"...

The generals in command center and battle zone, works on something called strategy... they consider all their assets and the effective use of those assets... they deploy their assets in battle zone... troops implement their strategy...

Here most of the internet warriors from both side are firing all those missiles and cluster bombs which are available in their mind to counter the opponent...

peace...

 

[MilSpec]

and we dont have one right???????

please spare me the lecture of PN's might

 

[Novice09]

Original article is pile fanboy hubris...and the most amazing is this line.

"
The Nasr Missile has a range of 60 Kms and The diameter of the Nasr suggests that it is designed to carry a tactical nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 kg."

Nuclear warhead weighing less than 1 Kg ..really??!!

Looks like Pakistanis can carry their nuclear warheads in their pant's pockets!!

Thank god... sucide bombers don't have access to those 1KG nukes...

 

[Nelson]

Sir that is exactly my point you are not USA you are India and if you will strike Army will hit you back with all the latest weapons and they want you make that mistake because it will improve their image to a great extent

In other words, US is paying you and India is not. Even if they kill more 30000 pakistanis and pay you some money, that would be fine with you. Its all about money honey.

 

[MilSpec]

It would be relatively easier for us to defend... We will also scatter our jets.. plus SAMs like SPADA,RB,HQ-9.....not to forget we have almost equal number of tanks ,... which r more advanced... and than we have numbers on our side with inhouse productio of A-100,Panters and new indigenous arty guns n the rest of advanced precisio strike arty systems.



By the time u will have MMRCAs we will be also fielding 150 FC-20s.. 64 F-16 blk 52+ (Might buy more according to chief of air staff)... 250-300 JF-17 blk-IIIs...



Cobras,super cobras n ATAK -T-129 helis.



Baburs and Raad ALCMs.



And we will have 8 AWACS... 4 SAAB,4 Korakoram Eagles.

assume, you had the Indian Armament and strength and Indians had pakistani armament stregth and strategic dept (or say lack of it ), you still think a Indians would quash Pakistani advance????

would you still say pakistan would be at disadvantage if it owned 270 MKI's,126 (say 75) MMRCA's, 150 bisons, 50lLCA's, 70 Mig 29SMT's, 50 M2K's 72 jags and 150 odd Mig 27's,
Along with armored strength of 4000 odd armored vehicles and the second largest standing army in the world... would you be at a disadvantage at the hands of india which say posseses Chinese 250 j17 and 150 fc20 and 65 f16's and has armored strength of around 3000 armored vehicles (1200 of which are chinese variantss of t54) Would you still say advantage India against such overwhelming odds

 

[ares]

Thank god... sucide bombers don't have access to those 1KG nukes...

Nuclear suicide bombers...LOL
Each suicide bomber carrying a dozen Pakistani tactical nukes around his waist..and who needs missiles or aircrafts ..Pakistanis can just chucks its nukes across the border..pray Shoib Akhatar will have job again!!