How To Attack Pakistan

[Salahadin]

I came across a very funny Article.


The options before us post 13/12 are bleak. Consider the scenarios - If India attacks Pakistan:



a) The IAF can achieve air superiority over PAF in about 3-5 days and sustain about 20-30% losses - mainly in the low flying, ground support categories.

The IN can effectively destroy PN and blockade Karachi so far so good.

b) Pakistan Army will throw every thing it has in to defending its country. Even though they lack BFRs and effective air support, the war will only end in a stalemate. The reason for this is our lack of overwhelming superiority in quality and quantity over our enemy. Its not commonly known that India is in terms of Purchasing Power Parity amongst the 10 richest nations of the world. It is time that we formulated a policy that would

I) Increase the force levels of the Indian Army so that we can effectively maintain a 3:1 superiority with Pakistan.

II) Equip the entire country with ABM network - we do have effective ABM capability with Russian 300 SAMs but its not effective all over the country.

III) Provide the IAF with night flying and attack capabilities with better precision guided munitions delivery capability.

IV) Provide the IAF with ability provide 24X7 AWACS capability at all areas.

V) Increase the number of MRCA with IAF so that we have at least 3:1 superiority over the PAF

VI) A Rapid Deployment Command with enough equipment and men to deliver at least 3 heavy re-enforced mechanised divisions anywhere in a 1000kms range.

VII) Better AAM, SAS, SAM, ASM capability

VIII) 2 Carrier Groups for the IN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All this would double the defense budget. Many say we can't afford it. The truth is otherwise. If we spend say, Rs. 180 Billion a year (That’s under US $4 Billions) WITHIN the country two things happen:

a) The ECONOMY benefits by this and the economy will GROW by more than US $20 Billion a year.

b) We REMAIN insulated from the vagaries of the 'globalized' world market. So 'ASIAN MELTDOWN' or 'US RECESSION' will affect us.



So the key is to spend the money within the country:



a) Give Indian Industry a call to arms as it were, I am sure they will respond. (ISRO is an example).

b) Spend NO or almost NO money on military equipment abroad (from the increased spend - keep the existing spending pattern for the present budget) After increasing the strength say over 2 years

THEN we should attack Pakistan, completely strip their military capability, shut down their madrassas and mullahs. Divide that country in to as many tribal leaders want to be called Prime Ministers, Emirs, Shakes, Presidents or whatever. This way we destroy our enemy and BECOME WEALTHY in the process.

*******************************************************************

 

[mhacsan]

looking at our present financial crisis, this guy is insane, we can not afford conventional war.

we will Nuke them, this is as simple as that.

 

[wtf]

I don't think this makes sense either military wise or economically. Do you know where you found this ? Is this by a reputed author or is it a random comment by somebody ?

As a military tactic, it makes no sense to have an all out war. Economically the idea is even more wrong. The whole idea of "war helps economically" came from US experience in world war 2. Before the war, US economy was limping along and had barely recovered from the depression. After the war their economy boomed and continued growing non-stop for 30-40 years.

But anyone who says that spending millions on bombs and then blowing the whole thing up in some European countries somehow made US rich is completely ignoring the external factors. While before the war the world trade was exclusively in pounds, after the war the whole thing switched to dollars - this made US Dollar much more stronger. Add to the fact that the whole world moved their gold deposits to the US, and you can see some of the reasons US became so powerful. There was also the fact that most of European and Asian Industrial strength was destroyed and US for a while became the factory of the world and due to massive immigration also the thought leader for the world. It is this that made US powerful, not the war. Interestingly enough, Canada managed to keep pace with US with only limited role in the war.

The author is nevertheless right that massive government intervention will help isolate world and Indian economic cycles, but that would be at the cost of devaluing the local currency and destroying the sectors (other than defense) which could have contributed more to the economy.

A massive government spending works, but only in extreme cases. One example is the Trillion dollar Obama Bailout which is modeled after the famous Keynesian "Helicopter Drop" to get people spending again. I have no clue how this will work in a savings based economy like in Asia (I guess we'll find that out from China)

 

[ANDUBYLL]

THe best way to attack and destroy any country is to destroy them from the inside. Organised warfare between India and Pakistan since 1947, have lasted less than a month all the time, with the net result that , both nations survived, had setbacks and came out stronger.
However, 'dhimaks' will destroy the foundations of a nation more efficently.

 

[godsavetheworld]

looking at our present financial crisis, this guy is insane, we can not afford conventional war.

we will Nuke them, this is as simple as that.

Its this obsession of yours with "nukes" that will destroy the region one day.

 

[SurvivoR]

Make a bollywood movie staring Sunni Deol he will grab Pakistan in his arms and will mash it in pieces. Damn he picks an entire truck and rootout a big fat tree in flick of a second with his bare hands.

If that takes a long time then do one thing go to sleep and have a dream where you attacked and destroyed Pakistan in few minutes.

 

[dabong1]

Its this obsession of yours with "nukes" that will destroy the region one day.

It wasnt us that started this nuclear build up.....it was you

 

[mhacsan]

Its this obsession of yours with "nukes" that will destroy the region one day.

we r talking war here, not cricket, got to win, n if it comes by nuking, why not, its not our obsession my friend, nerver was, but now its strategy and reality, first hit, n dont afraid of repercussions


Lighter note, war is a result of diplomatic failures, n i m against of it.

 

[mhacsan]

It wasnt us that started this nuclear build up.....it was you

 

[metalfalcon]

This article clearly shows that "Someone is Suffering from a Superiority Complex" BUT he has realized that They Need 3 Times Bigger Fire power to have a chance of Having Superiority over Pakistan.

I don't know why all these people are always thinking about going to WAR with Pakistan and Conquering Pakistan (Their Greatest Wet Dream Ever). Its NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

WAR IS JUST NOT ABOUT THE NUMBER GAME, It Takes Much More From a Nation to WIN a WAR, Fortunately we have the ability to Defend our Motherland and Push back any aggressor.

 

[Kharian_Beast]

Amateur piece of online garbage.

 

[godsavetheworld]

we r talking war here, not cricket, got to win, n if it comes by nuking, why not, its not our obsession my friend, nerver was, but now its strategy and reality, first hit, n dont afraid of repercussions


Lighter note, war is a result of diplomatic failures, n i m against of it.

Precisely the kind of sick mentality I have seen so many times on this forum, when it comes to nukes. Why do you forget there will be no Pakistan when India responds?. Nearly 100 million will be dead instantly,over a billion will succumb to radiation and the entire subcontinent will be rendered unhospitable. Dont give me maths, that more wil be on this side or that side. No amount to "logic" justifies the killing of 300 million on any side.

You will not win the war, you would have destroyed a part of the earth. You would have nothing to rejoice when the subcontinent goes back to stone age.
If that is what appeals to your pea sized nuke-loving brain, then you should re-define "victory" for yourself since no amount to education will make you a "literate" ever.

 

[Awesome]

Ok no one's attacking Pakistan! Whether it was a good article or not is besides the point! Anyone who schemes to attack Pakistan cannot be part of this forum.

 

[Jihad]

Ok, how many threads do we already have or had about Pakistan or India nuking eachother?
It get's boring.

 

[SurvivoR]

Anyone who schemes to attack Pakistan cannot be part of this forum.

then when are you banning 99% of them ?

+8 for your cool new display pic only if bull is not offended