PeacefulIndian
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2009
- Messages
- 796
- Reaction score
- 0
Useless article - even more useless responses...
may be mine is one of them as well
may be mine is one of them as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Useless article - even more useless responses...
may be mine is one of them as well
Precisely the kind of sick mentality I have seen so many times on this forum, when it comes to nukes. Why do you forget there will be no Pakistan when India responds?. Nearly 100 million will be dead instantly,over a billion will succumb to radiation and the entire subcontinent will be rendered unhospitable. Dont give me maths, that more wil be on this side or that side. No amount to "logic" justifies the killing of 300 million on any side.
You will not win the war, you would have destroyed a part of the earth. You would have nothing to rejoice when the subcontinent goes back to stone age.
If that is what appeals to your pea sized nuke-loving brain, then you should re-define "victory" for yourself since no amount to education will make you a "literate" ever.
Lets change to the question to "what if china attacked india and india was about to get defeated......would you use nukes against china?
Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.
It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?
Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.
It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?
THe best way to attack and destroy any country is to destroy them from the inside. Organised warfare between India and Pakistan since 1947, have lasted less than a month all the time, with the net result that , both nations survived, had setbacks and came out stronger.
However, 'dhimaks' will destroy the foundations of a nation more efficently.
Nukes are out of the question. Both India and China have a no first use policy. And neither are a trigger happy nation, unlike Pakistan. A future Indo-China conflict wouldn't last more than 2 days at max. UN would begin sweating in its pants, go overboard for a cease fire.
It would be foolish for India or China to send in cavalry across the Himalayas. Then why monger about a Indo-China war?
I must admit i love they way you avoid the question.....If india was about to be defeated by china even after the UN was involved.......would you still stick by your "no first use policy"?
Its a simple question and a basic yes or no will do!
Thats india is diong in pakistan!! Funding the liberation armys and the talibans!!