Natan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
OK. We a bit of a bully nation. Now what?If Israel can't see the difference, then it seems to me like its a bit of a bully nation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK. We a bit of a bully nation. Now what?If Israel can't see the difference, then it seems to me like its a bit of a bully nation.
Assad military is very well equipped and very well trained too..they have militarily occupied Lebanon for twenty something years...he has been able to sustain the civil war for a few good years now..with the world on one side and Assad on the other..Syria financial history as world largest defaulter nation has a role to play in the deterioration of their military assets as even the closest ally Russia refused to sell...until very recently when aiding against ISIS became necessary...
OK. We a bit of a bully nation. Now what?
Although It plays major role but we have same capabilities in a fraction of cost what others get.
There is no such thing as same capability. The misunderstanding common among members from both sides of the border is that numbers or technology translates to measurement of capability.Whereas each side leverages on other factors such as the terrain and environment to enhance its capability.Elaborate? Real world does not have fairy godmothers.
As for US largesse, It extracted enough from Pakistan in terms of economic equivalence and human costs.
So please tell how you claim to have "same" capablity which implies numerical and qualitative equivalence at the same economic cost.
There is no such thing as same capability. The misunderstanding common among members from both sides of the border is that numbers or technology translates to measurement of capability.Whereas each side leverages on other factors such as the terrain and environment to enhance its capability.
How long are terrain and environment going to stay relevant? There will come a stage where the defensive advantage offered would be offset by advances in technology.
Anyway this debate is irrelevant for all intents and purpose - even if Pakistan has lesser numbers and inferior quality weapons it matters not. The fact is that no country - not even US can "capture or invade" Pakistan the old way.
Off course it would. Back in desert storm, the Iraqi Air Defence network was considered one of the best(if not the) in the ME. Yet, a combination of overwhelming force and technology undid it.How long are terrain and environment going to stay relevant? There will come a stage where the defensive advantage offered would be offset by advances in technology.
Anyway this debate is irrelevant for all intents and purpose - even if Pakistan has lesser numbers and inferior quality weapons it matters not. The fact is that no country - not even US can "capture or invade" Pakistan the old way.
How long are terrain and environment going to stay relevant? There will come a stage where the defensive advantage offered would be offset by advances in technology.
Anyway this debate is irrelevant for all intents and purpose - even if Pakistan has lesser numbers and inferior quality weapons it matters not. The fact is that no country - not even US can "capture or invade" Pakistan the old way.
Car salesman psyche , hahahahaha i got reminded of that J-10 post of your.Hi,
That means what good would it do if a 250000 dollar missile destroys a $25 mud hut----it ain't going to be that painful-----but if in return it destroys a million or 5 million dollar or 10 million dollar target---that is where you would see the the true devastation caused by superior technology----and visualize the real pain of the opponent.
and then zia ul haq created taliban , lashkar e abc , lashkar e xyz which have destroyed pakistan from withinTruth always tastes bitter my friend....
Reality is reality whether u accept or not.
When Israel Air force landed its F-16 to lAB the then president ZiaulHaq visited India as there was a cricket match between Pakistan and India in year 1984.
He was sittind alongside the Indian pm and he said to Indian pm:
"Stop what u are doing to destroy our nuclear assets .There are many Muslims and Muslim countries in world except Pakistan but Hindu are only in India. We have successfully tested our Nuclear Assets but not yet have declared to the world u better stop this otherwise you will yourself responsible for your destruction"
Since then Israel backed up and didn't dared again .
you got anything more credible than him? if yes, then please enlighten usCar salesman psyche , hahahahaha i got reminded of that J-10 post of your.
It has to be business for you everywhere $$$.
and then zia ul haq created taliban , lashkar e abc , lashkar e xyz which have destroyed pakistan from within
Dont poke your nose into stuff you dont understand. Stop quoting me. Bugger off.you got anything more credible than him? if yes, then please enlighten us