Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
India is mostly Dravidians people who migrated north.. These Dravidians from Australia claim the IVC which without, South Asia would be unexplored... Loser Dravidians!!
My poor stupid Jellodragon, Dravidian is not a people, it is a group of languages. Like Brahui, which still exists in Baluchistan.
From approximately 10,000 BC onwards, India has been genetically identical. No vast migrations happened, south to north, north to south. The earlier Mundari, austric languages were overlaid by Dravidian languages, and the whole of India may have spoken this combination of Dravidian over austric. When Indo-Aryan languages were used, their influence covered northern India within two or three millennia. That's two to three thousand years. Not an overnight shift.
Nobody shifted around, populations stayed where they were. Small crusts of the uppermost layers of society changed, some of them consisting of the common descendants of people who brought in the new languages, some of them children of those who were there already. The numbers were small, there was no big change in genetic character, just as there was none earlier.
By the way, you ignorant loser, Dravidian speech probably came in from the middle east, not from Australia.
IVC was always there... It kept on carrying on... You are saying after the old IVC ended, no one lived near the Indus River? No buddy, thats where everyone wanted to be... Now hush Dravidians and sticks with yor Ganges
O scholar, the IVC collapsed and vanished from human memory around 1300 BC. There were no large cities there which succeeded, none, not for several centuries more, when first Lahore, then Peshawar, then Takshashila and Sialkot were established, and then much later Karachi. I am not sure about Multan and Quetta.
People lived near the Indus River but without a shred of the culture of the IVC. No cities, no drains, baths,harbors, no administrative buildings, no foreign trade, no sculpture, no seals, NOTHING.
Find out for yourself. Ask an educated friend, since you are obviously not educated yourself.
And also learn from your educated friend that although the Indo-Aryan speaking people may have been in numbers too small to displace any older people, the Scythians, then the Pahlava, then the Kushans, then the Ephthalite Huns swept in and overran the Indus Valley, with their herds of oxen and horses, their families, their tribal belongings, their steppe culture, everything. Whole provinces changed their names, Arachosia, for instance, to Sakasthan, the land of the Sakas, to today's Seisthan. So whatever tiny fragments of the original settlers may have survived between 1300 BC and 100 AD, 1400 years, would have been well and truly swept away.
Try to learn about these things before you open your mouth next time.