How India’s QR-SAM has poured Cold water on Pakistan’s NASR

[PakSword]

The other day an Indian said to me that India has developed capability to intercept a sniper's bullet as well..

 

[Osiris]

"QRSAM is a highly mobile air defence system which comes with 100 percent kill probability, and has the capability to neutralise aerial targets like fighter jets, cruise missiles and air to surface missiles as well as short-range ballistic missiles. QRSAM is also a vital component in India’s “Cold Start” Doctrine which will ensure the safety of forward Army formations in Enemy territories.The Mach 1.8"


The biggest bullshit I have ever read in a mentally challenged description of a military hardware.

There is no effective weapon in existence that can kill an extremely short range missile, because the reaction time and kill off probability is totally horrible.
But then we have indians who will go ga ga over a so called QRSAM that supposedly ensures a 100 percent kill probability.
I don;t know if I should laugh or feel sorry for the indians?

Wrong on both accounts, Iron Dome and David's sling can both take sort range missiles and rockets.

Even small but high supersonic and highly ATGM are taken down by tank's active defense systems.

 

[War Thunder]

Wrong on both accounts, Iron Dome and David's sling can both take sort range missiles and rockets.

Even small but high supersonic and highly ATGM are taken down by tank's active defense systems.

I am referring to a claimed "100% kill probability" on SRBM's or any Guided Rockets.
Let alone a highly maneuverable Missile that is designed to beat the Iron Dome and other Defences.

"The missile can carry nuclear warheads of appropriate yield with high accuracy. Pakistan has claimed that it was designed to overcome missile defense systems. It is also claimed that this missile is accurate. However actual figures of the CEP have not been disclosed. Mansoor Ahmed, of Quaid-e-Azam University’s Department of Defence and Strategic Studies claimed: "Its in-flight maneuverability is being improved to defeat potential Indian missile defenses against artillery rockets and short-range ballistic missiles, such as the Israeli Iron Dome system." He further went on to say that the system is "fully integrated into the centralized command-and-control structure through round the clock situational awareness in a digitized network centric environment to the decision makers at National Command Center. Nasr is obviously India-specific and the salvo launch capability is a key ability in stopping Indian armored thrusts into Pakistani territory."

The other day an Indian said to me that India has developed capability to intercept a sniper's bullet as well..

Yeah I heard they had been trialling pissing in the direction of the incoming bullet and it seemed to work on a few accounts.

 

[PakSword]

Yeah I heard they had been trialling pissing in the direction of the incoming bullet and it seemed to work on a few accounts.

No, it's through the laser and rail gun technology.. and it's automatic, when a Pakistani sniper fires a bullet, the radar senses within 0.001 seconds the signature of bullet fired, and in 0.002 second, it instructs to turn the laser and the rail gun towards that bullet.. In 0.003 seconds, it intercepts the bullet and between 0.003 and 0.005 seconds, the bullet is torn into 3-5 pieces with high probability of one piece hitting the sniper.

It saves one Indian soldier and kills one Pakistani sniper.. By Indian maths, these are two goals..

 

[War Thunder]

No, it's through the laser and rail gun technology.. and it's automatic, when a Pakistani sniper fires a bullet, the radar senses within 0.001 seconds the signature of bullet fired, and in 0.002 second, it instructs to turn the laser and the rail gun towards that bullet.. In 0.003 seconds, it intercepts the bullet and between 0.003 and 0.005 seconds, the bullet is torn into 3-5 pieces with high probability of one piece hitting the sniper.

It saves one Indian soldier and kills one Pakistani sniper.. By Indian maths, these are two goals..

Saving a soldier is never their goal.
They are cannon fodder.
Thrown en masse to their death.
Just like what they did in Kargil...

 

[Osiris]

I am referring to a claimed "100% kill probability" on SRBM's or any Guided Rockets.
Let alone a highly maneuverable Missile that is designed to beat the Iron Dome and other Defences.

"The missile can carry nuclear warheads of appropriate yield with high accuracy. Pakistan has claimed that it was designed to overcome missile defense systems. It is also claimed that this missile is accurate. However actual figures of the CEP have not been disclosed. Mansoor Ahmed, of Quaid-e-Azam University’s Department of Defence and Strategic Studies claimed: "Its in-flight maneuverability is being improved to defeat potential Indian missile defenses against artillery rockets and short-range ballistic missiles, such as the Israeli Iron Dome system." He further went on to say that the system is "fully integrated into the centralized command-and-control structure through round the clock situational awareness in a digitized network centric environment to the decision makers at National Command Center. Nasr is obviously India-specific and the salvo launch capability is a key ability in stopping Indian armored thrusts into Pakistani territory."



Yeah I heard they had been trialling pissing in the direction of the incoming bullet and it seemed to work on a few accounts.

What is your understanding of a 100% kill probability ?

For example - India's own BMD layered system has a 99.9% kill probability against incoming ballistic missile.

That means, if a single ballistic missile is launched, the dual layered BMD will be able to launch enough anti-missile against the incoming missile, that 99.9% of times the incoming missile will destroyed before hitting its target.

Similiarly QRSAM, 100% kill probability, doesn't mean that a single QRSAM will able destroy a single NASR 100% of times, but, only be able to launch enough anti-missiles at incoming threat, to ensure 100% kill probability.

Supposedly multiple NASRs are launched simultaneously against a single target, then obviously the kill probability of a single QRSAM system will decrease exponentially.

But then again, A Short Range ballistic missile, especially the one armed with nuclear weapons is hundreds of times more expensive than, a short range surface to air missile.

Speaking economically, hundreds of QRSAM can be deployed to intercept, at the cost single NASR- nuke combo.

You also have take into account, what if a salvo of QRSAMs is not able to completely destroy NASR but blast simply deflects the missile, to a nearby Pakistani town or village. Then you would nuked your own population.

Here we are not even considering, what will happen, if a nuclear NASR successfully able to hit an Indian IBG.

As per stated policy, India will unleash it entire strategic as well as tactical nuclear arsenal on Pakistan in response to any nuclear attack.

If all the above holds true - and given that, there is a moderate chance that your nuclear missile will be intercepted and if not intercepted, it will be inviting nuclear armagedon on Pakistan.

Will Pakistan military planners still be gung ho to launch nuclear fire cracker on an advancing Indian IBG, or will they try other means?

 

[War Thunder]

Will Pakistan military planners will still be gung ho to launch nuclear fire cracker on an advancing Indian IBG, or will they try other means?

YES!!!!!!

And your pathetic mind that happens to call it firecracker is the bullshit you smoke and live, because you lack the intellect to see things for what they are except living in denial. Exactly what we refer to as "Delusional mind".
Dare call a nuke laden missile a fire cracker when your rapist mongrels are blown up high.

Try having some balls to face the reality some times, you might get some enlightenment.

Now the question is:
Will your planners will be willing to risk extinction and death, for Pakistan launching tactical nukes on its own territory?

Answer is NO!!!!
Because you rats are too scared to die. All you know is how to rape innocent women.
And run away like little scum when facing certain death.

Do you want me to quote you the interview of your own general when he was describing your troops running away from Kargil like little sissis, and Pakistani Soldiers coming down to their base camp and challenging them to step out to fight? And none dared step out?

 

[Osiris]

YES!!!!!!

And your pathetic mind that happens to call it firecracker is the bullshit you smoke and live, because you lack the intellect to see things for what they are except living in denial. Exactly what we refer to as "Delusional mind".
Dare call a nuke laden missile a fire cracker when your rapist mongrels are blown up high.

Try having some balls to face the reality some times, you might get some enlightenment.

Now the question is:
Will your planners will be willing to risk extinction and death, for Pakistan launching tactical nukes on its own territory?

Answer is NO!!!!
Because you rats are too scared to die. All you know is how to rape innocent women.
And run away like little scum when facing certain death.

Do you want me to quote you the interview of your own general when he was describing your troops running away from Kargil like little sissis, and Pakistani Soldiers coming down to their base camp and challenging them to step out to fight? And none dared step out?

Lol..

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Perhaps you have the capacity to build hundreds, but what's interesting is you still haven't deployed even one tactical nuke.

On the same note, perhaps India has the capability to actually implement Cold Start, but whats interesting is that despite the repeated ranting, raving and hysterical outbursts (against Pakistan) of the Indian political and military leadership over insurgent attacks in Kashmir, nothing even close to Cold Start has been put in place to inflict some kind of cost on Pakistan.

Actions speak louder than words - India's impotence in inflicting any kind of serious, tangible cost (lets not even get into the farce called surgical strikes) on Pakistan quite clearly points to an Indian lack of capabilities (or at least a belief) that they can take on Pakistan in a conventional war and win in a manner that makes the Indian losses sustainable.

Logic, AM, dictates that you should have resources to supply fuel to your program.

Logic also dictates that investing billions of dollars and well over a decade in expanding nuclear weapons fuel infrastructure would not occur without guaranteed fuel supplies.

 

[ranadd]

On the same note, perhaps India has the capability to actually implement Cold Start, but whats interesting is that despite the repeated ranting, raving and hysterical outbursts (against Pakistan) of the Indian political and military leadership over insurgent attacks in Kashmir, nothing even close to Cold Start has been put in place to inflict some kind of cost on Pakistan.

Actions speak louder than words - India's impotence in inflicting any kind of serious, tangible cost (lets not even get into the farce called surgical strikes) on Pakistan quite clearly points to an Indian lack of capabilities (or at least a belief) that they can take on Pakistan in a conventional war and win in a manner that makes the Indian losses sustainable.


Logic also dictates that investing billions of dollars and well over a decade in expanding nuclear weapons fuel infrastructure would not occur without guaranteed fuel supplies.

Because unlike Pakistan, India has lots to loose other than blood. Don't confuse restrain with cowardice.

There is not a single war or conflict where Pakistan made any decisive victory. Stalemates and losses. Now, tell me how does "Pakistan quite clearly points to an Indian lack of capabilities"? What delusion are you going to feed me now?

 

[Viny]

On the same note, perhaps India has the capability to actually implement Cold Start, but whats interesting is that despite the repeated ranting, raving and hysterical outbursts (against Pakistan) of the Indian political and military leadership over insurgent attacks in Kashmir, nothing even close to Cold Start has been put in place to inflict some kind of cost on Pakistan.

Actions speak louder than words - India's impotence in inflicting any kind of serious, tangible cost (lets not even get into the farce called surgical strikes) on Pakistan quite clearly points to an Indian lack of capabilities (or at least a belief) that they can take on Pakistan in a conventional war and win in a manner that makes the Indian losses sustainable.


Logic also dictates that investing billions of dollars and well over a decade in expanding nuclear weapons fuel infrastructure would not occur without guaranteed fuel supplies.

India is busy uplifting its population to a better living standards, to better education and health system, towards a better world. Thats more important than answering a niggling neighbor. We dont want to mess up the growth and economy at this point of time.Our rising economy will itself create a big pool of distance which our enemies will find hard to jump over to make any concerns.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Because unlike Pakistan, India has lots to loose other than blood. Don't confuse restrain with cowardice.

There is not a single war or conflict where Pakistan made any decisive victory. Stalemates and losses. Now, tell me how does "Pakistan quite clearly points to an Indian lack of capabilities"? What delusion are you going to feed me now?

Can you provide evidence for your claims and assertions? Please provide the links here.

 

[ranadd]

Can you provide evidence for your claims and assertions? Please provide the links here.

No. Because I am lying.

 

[Ultima Thule]

No. Because I am lying.

No you're HYPER POWA OF THE UNIVERSE, AND WE ARE DEFENSELESS AGAINST YOU FUTURE INVASION @ranadd
GAY HYPER POWA HIND @ranadd

 

[ranadd]

No you're HYPER POWA OF THE UNIVERSE, AND WE ARE DEFENSELESS AGAINST YOU FUTURE INVASION @ranadd
GAY HYPER POWA HIND @ranadd

Well, To Pakistan India is a hypa Powa.

If past invasions are of any indication, gay or not, hope lube is still standard issue in Pakistan armed forces.