What's new

How India secretly armed Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance

Kailash Kumar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
4,643
Reaction score
-1
Country
Suriname
Location
Netherlands
How India secretly armed Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance

V. Sudarshan

SEPTEMBER 01, 2019

TH01MASSOUD2-1

Ahmad Shah Massoud, the commander of the Northern Alliance.

India must not commit the error of placing Indian troops on Afghan soil, says the diplomat who coordinated New Delhi’s secret military assistance to Ahmad Shah Massoud, the military commander of the Northern Alliance, who fought the Taliban and U.S. forces till his assassination in 2001.

For four years, between 1996 and 2000, till he left the Tajik capital Dushanbe to take up his new posting, Ambassador Bharath Raj Muthu Kumar coordinated military and medical assistance that India was secretly giving to Massoud and his forces.

It all began, says Mr. Muthu Kumar, exactly a week after September 26, 1996, when the Taliban, backed by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), took over Kabul, shot former President Najibullah dead, castrated him, and hung his body from a lamp post. Just hours before, Indian Embassy staff had scrambled into the last plane out of a country that had begun its descent into hell.

Amrullah Saleh, who looked after Kabul’s interests in the Tajik capital, called Mr. Muthu Kumar to inform him that the “Commander” would like to meet him.

“Commander” was a reference to Massoud, the Lion of Panjshir, who made his name guerrilla-fighting the Soviets when they occupied Afghanistan for 10 years. The Indian ambassador sought instructions from New Delhi on what was to be done. The response: “Listen carefully, report back faithfully, and play it by ear.”

Over chai and dry fruits
Massoud maintained a house on Karamova Ulitse in Dushanbe. He had his own staff and Mohammed Saleh Registani looked after the affairs of his house. It was here that the Indian ambassador regularly began meeting Ahmed Shah Massoud, discussing, over endless chai and dry fruits, the bewilderingly shifting fortunes of the battles in Afghanistan where money was enough to swing fighters. The Commander did not speak English and Amrullah, who would later go on to become Intelligence Chief, interpreted for him. The Indian ambassador subsequently had his number two in the mission, Dr S.A. Qureshi on hand for interpretation.

At the first meeting, the Commander had dramatically thrown his trademark cap down on the table, and declared, that was all the space he required — the circumference of his headgear — to stand and fight for his country. He put it simply: “I need India’s support.” He then set out a list of items he needed.

What is in it for us? Delhi queried. Mr. Muthu Kumar explained, “He is battling someone we should be battling. When Massoud fights the Taliban, he fights Pakistan.”

Expanding list
The Commander’s wish list kept growing, and when once, New Delhi agreed to send only a fraction of the requirement, Mr. Muthu Kumar sent a message explaining Massoud’s predicament with an Ajit joke: “We have thrown him in liquid oxygen: the liquid won’t let him live and the oxygen won’t allow him to die.”

Jaswant Singh, a former soldier, and then BJP leader, who had become External Affairs Minister, read the cables the first thing. He directly called Mr. Muthu Kumar and gave him a message to deliver to the Commander: “Please assure him that he will have his requirements.”

Short of sending heavy equipment, India provided extensive assistance to the Northern Alliance — uniforms, ordnance, mortars, small armaments, refurbished Kalashnikovs seized in Kashmir, combat and winter clothes, packaged food, medicines, and funds through his brother in London, Wali Massoud. Assistance would be delivered circuitously with the help of other countries who helped this outreach.

Mr. Muthu Kumar does not recall the quantities and the detailed itemisation. The logistics of procurement and delivery was handled by the Military Intelligence wing in New Delhi. The supplies arrived regularly at Dushanbe, and the Tajik customs ensured the smooth transfer to Farkhor, at the border between Tajikistan and northern Afghanistan, where Massoud maintained around 10 helicopters for his war efforts. New Delhi also helped maintain the helicopters with spares and service. Between 1996 and 1999 India gifted two Mi-8 helicopters.

Frontline hospital
The wounded arrived incessantly from the battlefront in helicopters at Farkhor. Those requiring sustained treatment were sent to Delhi via Farkhor and Dushanbe, the visas furnished in double-quick time. Also, at Farkhor, where the embassy had scouted for a hospital, an isolation clinic had been refurbished with two operating theatres, twenty-four beds for the convalescing and an ICU of between six to eight beds, depending on the requirement. Five doctors and twenty-four paramedics ran the hospital, which also had an OPD for locals. The medical outreach project had been valued at that time at $7.5 million.

When Ambassador Muthu Kumar wanted to build a helipad right next to the hospital for the convenience of the wounded, New Delhi jokingly admonished him, “Now you are getting carried away!” He found a convenient solution. Farkhor was in the cotton belt and for ginning cotton, they used reinforced concrete slabs seven or eight inches thick and large enough to comfortably land an MI8. So the medical facility had a helipad as well. Indian officials began flying up to Dushanbe to meet Massood and also have themselves photographed with him.

The policy grew more substantial when President Emamoli Rahmon indicated he would like a technical halt in New Delhi on his way back from Vietnam, on January 22, 1999. Prime Minister Vajpayee invited him for lunch at his residence and ways were discussed to deepen the ties.

New Delhi was interested in an airbase in Aini to maintain forward presence in the area. It had been used by the Russians who maintained Su-25 aircraft, subsonic, heavily armed. After they withdrew, it fell into disuse, and India lengthened the runway, upgraded the airbase, did a ferry run, and flew a flag there too and stationed a Commandant with the rank of a Group Captain with four officers under him. The Aini airbase has no IAF aircraft on ground but is a part of India’s well-equipped training mission in Tajikistan.

It was to the Farkhor medical facility run by India that Massoud was brought when he was assassinated on September 9, 2001. Registani, who had become a general, called Mr. Muthu Kumar who had been posted to Minsk in Belarus, to say that the Commander had been attacked, and was beyond help.

The date coincided with the diplomat’s wedding anniversary, and he was throwing a dinner; he promptly cancelled the event without assigning any reason.

It was days later that Massoud’s death was announced. The first military attaché arrived after the RAW man in the embassy had arrived towards the end of Mr. Muthu Kumar’s tenure. Almost as soon as the first American military boot hit the Afghanistan soil, the hospital in Farkhor was ordered to be wound up and shifted to Mazar-e-Sharif.

Echoes today
This nearly hidden chapter in New Delhi’s relationship with Afghanistan grows in salience as the talks between Taliban and the Americans veer around to formulating a way forward, combined with the repeated and open American request to India to participate more robustly in the security matrix in Afghanistan.

Barely three months before he died, towards the end of May, Commander Massoud visited New Delhi. He was there for four days, at New Delhi’s invitation. Jaswant Singh records, in his book, A Call to Honour, “This had to be a closely guarded visit, as any number of terrorist groups from Afghanistan and Pakistan were vying to take his life.” He noted that, “India’s co-operation with the Northern Alliance is still largely an untold account. A more complete narration of it has to wait.”

Is there a take-away from India’s experience that is relevant now? Mr. Muthu Kumar quotes Massoud as saying in August 1998, before the U.S. launched cruise missile attacks on Kandahar and elsewhere, says, “I recall Commander Massoud telling me in August 1998 before the U.S. launched cruise missile attacks on Kandahar and elsewhere that “The problem in Afghanistan — more than the Taliban — is the presence of foreign forces. so I am also fighting these forces who are with the Taliban. After the massacre of Iranian diplomats in Mazar-e-Sharif this summer, Iran massed more than 2,50,000 soldiers on our border to punish the Taliban, so I advised the leadership in Iran, do not invade Afghanistan as I am fighting foreign forces, so just give me material assistance to defeat the foreign forces and the Taliban.”

Given his experience, Mr. Muthu Kumar says, “Taking note of Masood’s exchange, my thinking is that we must not commit that gross error of placing Indian boots on Afghan soil. What will Indian troops do? What could we achieve and who will we fight and defend? The leaders of the present Government and the Taliban are only two major facets of Afghan politics — they have to resolve their differences for that elusive peace and stability.”

https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...assouds-northern-alliance/article29310513.ece
 
. . . .
I think India should definitely help Afghans. Money is just not enough. We need the Indian army to lockdown Afghanistan.


Look my dear, Kashmir valley is a different ball game. If things get too hot in the Kashmir valley, Indians would just pull back into Jammu or Himachal.

If things get too hot in Afghanistan, Indians would have a miserable death.

Thanks but No Thanks.
 
.
@maximuswarrior

I might be wrong, but is this former Indian ambassador not saying (implicitly) that India should not send soldiers to Afghanistan, but that they should find a 'new' Northern Alliance to (militarily) support?

Chances are that when the U.S. leaves Afghanistan, the Taliban will overrun Kabul.

History will repeat itself.

I think that India suspects that Pakistan's ISI will support the Taliban again in regaining control of Afghanistan.

They (as in the Taliban) might do it in a democratic way or in a military way. Or both.
That is what the Taliban is doing now.
They are negotiating peace and democracy while attacking places which are under Afghan government control at the same time.
And they are winning.
Why should they stop this winning strategy (even after a 'peace' treaty is signed)?

So, India might think that it is useless to support a failing Afghan government.
They also might think that it is better to find (or create) a 'new' Northern Alliance to support.
And not only to fight the Taliban.

What is in it for us? Delhi queried. Mr. Muthu Kumar explained, “He is battling someone we should be battling. When Massoud fights the Taliban, he fights Pakistan.”
 
.
@maximuswarrior

I might be wrong, but is this former Indian ambassador not saying (implicitly) that India should not send soldiers to Afghanistan, but that they should find a 'new' Northern Alliance to (militarily) support?

Chances are that when the U.S. leaves Afghanistan, the Taliban will overrun Kabul.

History will repeat itself.

I think that India suspects that Pakistan's ISI will support the Taliban again in regaining control of Afghanistan.

They (as in the Taliban) might do it in a democratic way or in a military way. Or both.
That is what the Taliban is doing now.
They are negotiating peace and democracy while attacking places which are under Afghan government control at the same time.
And they are winning.
Why should they stop this winning strategy (even after a 'peace' treaty is signed)?

So, India might think that it is useless to support a failing Afghan government.
They also might think that it is better to find (or create) a 'new' Northern Alliance to support.
And not only to fight the Taliban.

What is in it for us? Delhi queried. Mr. Muthu Kumar explained, “He is battling someone we should be battling. When Massoud fights the Taliban, he fights Pakistan.”

Fortunately, he doesn't realize that fighting a proxy war in Afghanistan against Pakistan is futile. Maybe someone should suggest that his government either bring troops to Afghanistan to defeat Pakistan directly or spend those monies elsewhere. Maybe a 500-meter sized shiva linga or some fake heroic Peshwa that once died valiantly fighting the Muslims.
 
.
Unfortunately, he doesn't realize that fighting a proxy war in Afghanistan against Pakistan is futile.

@M.Bison

But who says that India wants to win a (proxy) war with Pakistan in Afghanistan?

If a (proxy) war is won or lost, than that is it. Done. End of story.

If a (proxy) war goes go on and on, you are able to drain the enemy (financially) and keep them on their toes.
 
.
@M.Bison

But who says that India wants to win a (proxy) war with Pakistan in Afghanistan?

If a (proxy) war is won or lost, than that is it. Done. End of story.

If a (proxy) war goes go on and on, you are able to drain the enemy (financially) and keep them on their toes.

Indians are not good at proxy wars and are bound to lose to Pakistan.
 
. .
We make fun of india but they have since long worked on a policy to encircle Pakistan. India even currently have influence on northern alliance, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. They also are allies with iran. We do not have much alliance in east of india, Myanmar is also slipping away.

The best option for Pakistan is to work for peace in Afghanistan and make sure taliban have say in power. Pakistan can then extend to central asia. Turkmenistan is friendly to pakistan as they r turcik. Through Turkmenistan we can extend to turkey and others and have a business corridor.
 
.
We make fun of india but they have since long worked on a policy to encircle Pakistan. India even currently have influence on northern alliance, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. They also are allies with iran. We do not have much alliance in east of india, Myanmar is also slipping away.

The best option for Pakistan is to work for peace in Afghanistan and make sure taliban have say in power. Pakistan can then extend to central asia. Turkmenistan is friendly to pakistan as they r turcik. Through Turkmenistan we can extend to turkey and others and have a business corridor.


Iran just strongly opposed Indian move in Kashmir.

The money spent by India on Northern alliance went down the drain the day US & Taliban started talking.

Russia kicked India out of Tajik base.

On the other hand Pakistan-China are selling JF-17 to Myanmar, Building naval bases in Sri Lanka & Myanmar and Rail Road to Nepal.

@PaulSimon

Indians might not be good at proxy wars, but Americans and Israelis are.

You do the math.

US would be happy as long as China is in check. US does not mind Pakistan/Taliban ruling Afghanistan & Kashmir.
 
. .
@PaulSimon

What?

I do think they mind.

I really do.

As long as Pakistan/Taliban are in goods books of the US, I do not think US minds it.

US just needs Pakistan/Taliban to support its presence in Afghanistan and Kashmir to keep an eye on Russia and China.
 
.
@M.Bison

But who says that India wants to win a (proxy) war with Pakistan in Afghanistan?

If a (proxy) war is won or lost, than that is it. Done. End of story.

If a (proxy) war goes go on and on, you are able to drain the enemy (financially) and keep them on their toes.

When the Americans stupidly invaded Afghanistan the Indians realized an opportunity to cement their position on the world stage as a superpower.

The Indians hatched a plan that would kill two birds with one stone. They tried to encircle Pakistan while simultaneously undermining Chinese influence in central and western Asia. They first supported Anti-Taliban forces inside Afghanistan while propagandizing anti-Pakistan sentiment. They then gave the Iranis a shoulder to cry with the promise to build the Chabhar port and to buy its cheap oil. Meanwhile, the Indians directly supported cross-border terrorism and anti-government elements from Afganistan and Iran inside Pakistan.

The cherry on the cake was Modi's election and the BJP's agenda being directly supported by the youth within India. Modi had the gall to ramp this plan up and gave Hindus a reason to be proud again. In Pakistan, PPP and the sharifs were elected and all was going to plan. Pakistan would be broken into 4 parts, China would be contained to the straights of malacia and India would dominate trade within Central Asia. The dream of supapowa 2020 would finally be realized and India would become a nation of cows once again.

Fortunately for the world, Two things happened. First, the Americans elected their new Meshiac (trump) with the help of AIPAC and the Jewish lobby. Second, the Taliban actually started to win and the false death of Osama gave trump an out.

Now coming to your point, You say Indians don't need to or want to win this proxy war but the Indian posture contradicts your point of view. First off, India has started to scale back its relations with Iran. This is a direct slight to her aspirations to dominate trade with Central Asia. Trade has been stopped and chabhar's funding has been downgraded. By doing this, India has made it clear that it will always side with Israel and evangelicals within the United States.

The Americans have realized that the National Afghan Army is useless. Trump's largemouth has made his voters embarrassed to elect him and he desperately needs a talking point for his next term. He first tried to get India to post some Vedic soldiers within Afghanistan but the Hindus know better. The days of Ashoka are long gone and while barking very loud, the Hindus don't have enough muscle to outdo the Coalition of the willing. So Trump and the US called on an old friend, Pakistan to once again get it out of a bad predicament. Trump also humiliated India by making her sit at the kiddy table while the parents spoke about more sophisticated things.

So now what does a psychopath do when she gets slighted? She goes on a spree of murder, rape, and tyranny.
Indian intelligence and BJP party members have made it crystal clear that after the Americans pull out of Afghanistan they are afraid of jihad inside Kashmir. So like a scared cat, the Indians have decided to scratch preemptively instead of waiting for things to happen.

War is always the last option and the Indian establishment has no other choice. Given what India is doing in recent times, you can see that India sees war as a viable option. She failed miserably in asymmetric warfare. So now she wants to try her hand in a real war. That is the conclusion. The war is not going on and on, it is coming to its rightful conclusion.

Your second point that the Pakistani economy was bled with proxy warfare from the Indians is again false. Indians need to realize that a large portion of the Pakistani economy is unaccounted for. Pakistan's government and Bureaucracy mismanage taxes and are horrendously corrupt. Pakistani politicians have a bad habit of directly siphoning monies into personal offshore accounts while borrowing from the IMF to run the affairs of laypeople.

Lol, I like the way you have summed things so simply. But fortunately, the events on the ground are different from your preception. The Indian populace is gullible and is purposefully kept stupid via religion and superstition. The once-mighty educated Hindu that elected soft-spoken backstabbing educated people has now resorted to being lead by loud, bear-hugging chia walas.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom