Great read giving insight on how Afghan special force with superior training and firepower destroyed the Talis in just 7 hours. Their lighting strikes, night operations ensured that the Talis wer
e completely outmatched.
PS : As I explained in my earlier posts, the capture of the Kunduz for a few hours was a side show operation to show the capabilities of the ANSF, sideline militas and destroy the Talis. The militas and in a complete shock and disarray as their Tali brethren. There is no difference between the two.
Afghanistan's Elite Special Forces led in Recovering most of Kunduz from Taliban | Informed Comment
The original article was posted
here on RFE/RL. Frud Bezhan is a respected journalist but the article leaves many things to question:
1. No mention is made that roughly 500 uneducated Taliban took one of the most strategic cities of Afghanistan, Kunduz in a matter hours
2. The 500 Taliban held the city for 3 days and still are terrorizing the city
3. The 500 Taliban have done this in the North far away from their much maligned sanctuaries in Pakistan
4. The 500 Taliban do not have air support, heavy weapons, med-evac, modern intelligence which the ANSF complains it has to rely on the US for
5. The US had to use fighter jets to provide air cover for the Afghan forces
6. When Kunduz fell to these 500 Taliban there were between 5,000 to 10,000 ANSF forces guarding Kunduz including a much vaunted Command Formation (and we are not talking about Arbaki or ALP here)
7. I have not seen an article in the NYT, WP, Economist which did not rate the performance of ANSF as dismal -- much worse than what was expected
8. I have not seen an article in the NYT, WP, Economist which did not consider this as a major victory for the Taliban in the psychological and political sense.
Further one should consider what would have happened if there were no US and NATO advisors and if there were no US and NATO enables: med-evac, artillery, air support.
Perhaps the Afghans know something the rest of the world doesn't -- however to those of us sitting outside Afghanistan, such optimism at the ANSF is mind boggling at best and dangerous at worst. The barometer that perhaps shows where the balance of truth lies is the number of Passport applicants in Afghanistan and the number of Afghans who are seeking refuge in Europe.
The problem with bad news is that it is bad -- but spinning bad news as good news is incredibly dangerous -- and it is most dangerous for the Afghans.