Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ancient Babylonians were Arabs as much ancient Egyptians were Arabs. Also, before Arab conquest Mesopotamia was mainly ruled by many dynasties from Persia. Romans and later Arabs dominated the Indian ocean trade but the trade was surviving on Indian products including spices. Hindu is just our religion, our Indian identity comes from our culture and folklore from the idea of Bharata varsha( the land south of the Himalayas and north of the seas) and we still carry that ancient identity as the people of Bharata varsha. I don't what it has to do with different languages we speak, even Arab race is comprised of numerous tribes.
Going by that logic Arabs, Jews and all of those Semitic people are the exact same. No, actually a more fitting comparison is clustering all ME people into one body. Since we share as much in common as people from South India do with people in Northwest India if not much more.
Checkmate.
Certainly not, since you never believed your self as a people of common nation or culture, Semitic is just a racial classification given by western anthropologist, a nationalistic or cultural classification hardly existed. South Indians and North Indians share common ancestry from two parent races, common culture, religions, books, music, dress, folklores, and all us believed we belonged to nation called Bharat which being a part of our folklore since time eternal. Please don't make irrelevant comparison with some hypothetical Semitic nation which is no more than a anthropological term.
What are you talking about clown? That's actually the case. More than your people who did not even speak languages related to each other or belonging to the same language family. We are similar people which is a fact based on ancient common history, genetics, cultural, linguistic etc. similarity. Those are undeniable facts. A clueless Indian is not going to claim otherwise because his ignorance was highlighted in this debate.
There is no such thing a Semitic identity other than studying about it in anthropology book, how can you even compare hypothetical race with our historic and nationalistic identityOur Indian race was recognized throughout the world since the antiquity including recognition by Arabs.
![]()
There is nothing called an "Indian race" in anthropology. Not even a linguistic group.You are dumber than I thought. On the other hand a Semitic people /race/linguistic group native to the ancient Middle East (corresponding fully to what is now the Arab world) has been known for millenniums and is a historical, linguistic, genetic, religious and geographic reality. Recognized as such worldwide. By Semites themselves in their ancient scriptures, religions, folklore etc.
While I am yet to hear about an "Indian" race as such. It's more a bunch of distinct ethnic/linguistic/racial groups inhabiting what is now India without ever being a united mass before the British conquerors created it in 1947.
Anyway there is no point wasting more time with you. My posts are clear for all to see as are the references. In the meantime good luck living in your fantasy world.
no civilisation of mesopotamia is a lot older than sumerian , the sumerian were themselves conqueror from Anatolia and northwestern and westen area of IranWeren't Sumerians starters of the civilization in Mesopotamia ?
no civilisation of mesopotamia is a lot older than sumerian , the sumerian were themselves conqueror from Anatolia and northwestern and westen area of Iran
Conclusions
Evidence of genetic stratification ascribable to the Sumerian development was provided by the Y-chromosome data where the J1-Page08 branch reveals a local expansion, almost contemporary with the Sumerian City State period that characterized Southern Mesopotamia. On the other hand, a more ancient background shared with Northern Mesopotamia is revealed by the less represented Y-chromosome lineage J1-M267*. Overall our results indicate that the introduction of water buffalo breeding and rice farming, most likely from the Indian sub-continent, only marginally affected the gene pool of autochthonous people of the region. Furthermore, a prevalent Middle Eastern ancestry of the modern population of the marshes of southern Iraq implies that if the Marsh Arabs are descendants of the ancient Sumerians, also the Sumerians were most likely autochthonous and not of Indian or South Asian ancestry.
The Sumerians described Dilmun as a paradise garden in the Epic of Gilgamesh.[12] The Sumerian tale of the garden paradise of Dilmun may have been an inspiration for the Garden of Eden story.[12]
Khwazismi was Persian you dumb Indian, learn some facts about him.