RAMPAGE
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Messages
- 5,855
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
You a falconer ???^^^ Another 7.62 NATO weapon. Nice!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You a falconer ???^^^ Another 7.62 NATO weapon. Nice!
Oh really? Mind posting the prices, and the quality of each rifle that's been posted in the list your provided? It seems that you're making a very broad assumption.
The AK is not even a choice, because it's already in active service in Pakistan.
So which bird would you recommend for a beginner ???I am indeed!
You live in Pakistan? I'm not sure what species are available or recommended there but I would definitely contact these guys...So which bird would you recommend for a beginner ???
I think I will contact them. thanks.You live in Pakistan? I'm not sure what species are available or recommended there but I would definitely contact these guys...
Pak Falconry Assocation
They have a Facebook page as well...
Pakistan Falconry Association | Facebook
Definitely contact them so you can find a falconer close to you that can help you.I think I will contact them. thanks.
So which bird are you flying ???
^^^ Another 7.62 NATO weapon. Nice!
That is a very good looking rifle and I think a worthy replacement. I still find it interesting that Pakistan's military is bucking the trend and sticking with the 7.62 NATO calibre. As for the AR style action, like the new American weapons, they are not the same as the old M16 series in that they are not a direct gas system but use a piston which greatly reduces chamber fouling and jamming. I think it will be great!
He's beautiful !!!Definitely contact them so you can find a falconer close to you that can help you.
I will not go trapping for a new bird for about another six or eight weeks as the birds need to mature and migrate north to where I live in Idaho, in the northwestern US. I trap and train a bird and then release them back to the wild after a hunting season. Sometimes I keep them over for the next season, but usually not. My last bird was a Red-tailed hawk. I hunted rabbits with him. Here he is...
View attachment 32294
For myself? Definitely prefer the 7.62. As for an army, probably depends on the war. In Vietnam, the 5.56 was better as you didn't shoot a long ranges. You needed lots of firepower and that means as much "lead down range" as possible, and you could carry far more rounds of 5.56 ammo than you could 7.62. In Afghanistan, I would prefer the 7.62 as it is very open, desert and semi-desert country and you shoot at much longer ranges. I think most armies prefer the 5.56, however.Sir, are you for or against 7.62 rounds?
What is the advantage of adapting 5.56mm rounds over 7.62mm rounds? What are the draw backs?
Which one would you prefer if commanding an army of your own?
Little insights from the experts would be good for readers...
We don't have money to replace them at once. They are upgrading them to G-3M standards for a stopgap. Pakistan Army prefers battle rifles to assault rifles.
Definitely contact them so you can find a falconer close to you that can help you.
I will not go trapping for a new bird for about another six or eight weeks as the birds need to mature and migrate north to where I live in Idaho, in the northwestern US. I trap and train a bird and then release them back to the wild after a hunting season. Sometimes I keep them over for the next season, but usually not. My last bird was a Red-tailed hawk. I hunted rabbits with him. Here he is...
View attachment 32294
These are post 2000 rifles:
QBZ-03 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pindad SS2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IMI Tavor TAR-21 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heckler & Koch HK416 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Beretta ARX 160 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CZ-805 BREN - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ČZW-556 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Desarrollos Industriales Casanave SC-2005 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
EMERK - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FAD assault rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FN SCAR - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
FX-05 Xiuhcoatl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pindad SS2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Special Operations Assault Rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Type 11 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
T91 assault rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Truvelo Raptor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Robinson Armament XCR - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
VB Berapi LP06 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
W+F C42 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
XM8 rifle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Zastava M21 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now minus the colombian,taiwanese,malaysian,indonsian,mexican and the AK variants like bren or zastava... ur are left with US M...variant/based on weapons...,S.African raptor (shitty),Chinese QBZ,Israeli tavor,Scar,ARX,HK-417,c-52,VHS
You realize that none of them actually have a price attached, right? The thing is that we don't have a clear idea on how much these rifles would cost in bulk + licensed assembly, we do know it'll cost over a $billion guaranteed, there is just no clue as to the total cost of training soldiers with a new rifle, the cost of scraping or storing the G-3s, and the added cost of ammunition and accessories. An expensive rifle could come with cheaper accessories, or could have a better survivability rate (ex, things like the barrel), or cheaper rifles could come with the exact opposite. The military will be looking at long term costs with these rifles, as well as short term costs.
There are way too many variables, so I'm not going to make a complete judgement. Like I said before, I'm not an expert, so take my words with a pinch of salt. Anyways, my point is simple, total cost + quality is what will determine Pakistan's future rifle of choice, nothing else. my time range was just a suggestion based on outdated information.