What's new

History of Tibet

This flag invented in China ?

No, the flag was inspired by USA flag. And it belonged to the Liberation Front of Champa (FLC – Le Front pour la Libération de Cham).

In the 1960s there were various movements of uprising to free the Cham people and create their own state. The movements were the Liberation Front of Champa (FLC – Le Front pour la Libération de Cham) and the Front de Libération des Hauts plateaux. The latter sought cooperation with other hilltribes. The initial name of the movement was called "Front des Petits Peuples" from 1946 to 1960. In 1960 the name was changed to "Front de Libération des Hauts plateaux" and joined, with the FLC, the "Front unifié pour la Libération des Races opprimées" (FULRO) at some point in the 1960s. Today there is no serious secessionist movement or political activity.


Today the majority of Cham in Vietnam are Hindu, while their Cambodian counterparts are largely Muslim.[4][5] A small number of the Eastern Cham also follow Islam and to a lesser degree Mahayana Buddhism. Many emigrated to France in the late 1960s after the civil war broke out.
 
Thanks lcloo. so:
Free Champa.

Yep, free them...........but US. doesn't want to do it, China doesn't strong enough, and Champa men don't care about politic now, they're living peacefully with another ethnic groups :lol:
 
Free for Nan Yue quo 南粵國
Yep, free Hannan too coz it belong to Baiyue:yahoo:
Hainan Provincial Museum Ethnic Minorities Exhibition of Chinese History

"The minorities of Hainan mainly inhabit the Central and Southern areas of Hainan Island. With a population of over 1.4 million, the Li, Miao and Hui nationalities have been living on Hainan Island for generations. They have worked hard overcoming many difficulties and, together with the Han nationality, have jointly developed and built Hainan Island, and created a long history and a unique culture.


The Li nationality is the earliest of inhabitants on Hainan Island. Their ancestors were from Luo Yue, a branch of the Bai Yue nationality, migrating to Hainan Island 3000 years ago successively. The Miao nationality probably moved in from Guangxi and other places as the ordinary soldiers of the Ming Dynasty, and settled down in Hainan ever since. The Hui people mainly live in Sanya Phoenix Town, and many of their ancestors were from Zhancheng (Central and Southern areas of today's Vietnam) during the Song and Yuan Dynasties
Chinese History | Hainan Ethnic Minorities
Hainan_ethnolinguistic_1967.png
 
China demands U.S. Congress people to stop supporting Dalai Lama
English.news.cn 2011-07-09 16:28:12 FeedbackPrintRSS
BEIJING, July 9 (Xinhua) -- China on Saturday demanded that some people with the U.S. Congress stop indulging and supporting the Dalai Lama group in anti-China and separatist activities.

"The Tibetan affairs are purely China's internal affairs, and China firmly opposes any country or any person to interfere in China's internal affairs on the Tibetan issue," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said in response to a journalist's question.

The words and actions of the Dalai Lama during the past decades have proven that he is not simply a religious person, but a political exile who has been engaged in separatist activities against China under the disguise of religion, Hong said.

According to media reports, John Boehner, speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and several U.S. congress people met with the Dalai Lama in his current U.S. visit.
 
You are a complete fool!



Racially, Tibetans share the same root as Han.

Don't attempt to think Tibetans are ancestor-forgetting as your ingrates are.

Haha. The most hilarious story that I have ever heard.
Tibetan had been an independent nation before China swallowed it tin the 1950s. That is the obvious thing. And their religious culture is not the same as the Chinese. Why you said Tibetan share the same root with China. If so, the whole world share the root with China. Do you mean that? :woot:
 
Fortunelately, I've found out a brief history of Tibet
-------------

Dragon Attacks 1949-1959
Taking the first step toward what has become 50 years of oppression, China's People's Liberation Army invades Tibet, killing more than 10,000. Repeated attempts by The Dalai Lama to negotiate with China are dismissed. In 1950, the 15-year-old Dalai Lama is forced into full leadership of Tibet, while in 1951 a Tibetan Delegation is forced to sign the 17-Point Agreement, promising "Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet." During 1959, The Dalai Lama went to China to speak with Chairman Mao Zedong. Mao told him, "Religion is poison. ... Tibet and Mongolia have both been poisoned by it." Also during this year, the Chinese retaliate against the Tibetan resistance, killing more than 87,000. On March 17, 1959, The Dalai Lama escapes His sacred homeland, seeking political asylum in India. The Chinese declare martial law as thousands of Tibetan refugees begin pouring into India.

-------
So any Chinese can explain why China love to massacre?
 
Fortunelately, I've found out a brief history of Tibet
-------------

Dragon Attacks 1949-1959
Taking the first step toward what has become 50 years of oppression, China's People's Liberation Army invades Tibet, killing more than 10,000. Repeated attempts by The Dalai Lama to negotiate with China are dismissed. In 1950, the 15-year-old Dalai Lama is forced into full leadership of Tibet, while in 1951 a Tibetan Delegation is forced to sign the 17-Point Agreement, promising "Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet." During 1959, The Dalai Lama went to China to speak with Chairman Mao Zedong. Mao told him, "Religion is poison. ... Tibet and Mongolia have both been poisoned by it." Also during this year, the Chinese retaliate against the Tibetan resistance, killing more than 87,000. On March 17, 1959, The Dalai Lama escapes His sacred homeland, seeking political asylum in India. The Chinese declare martial law as thousands of Tibetan refugees begin pouring into India.

-------
So any Chinese can explain why China love to massacre?


These are Tibetan combatant casualties in battles, by your defination some one had massacred millions of Vietcons and NVA regulars not too long ago.

And pls provide reliable source validating accuracies of these figures.
 
Haha. The most hilarious story that I have ever heard.
Tibetan had been an independent nation before China swallowed it tin the 1950s. That is the obvious thing. And their religious culture is not the same as the Chinese. Why you said Tibetan share the same root with China. If so, the whole world share the root with China. Do you mean that? :woot:

By Genetic Anthropology defination all mongoliods shared the same root, so technically the claim made by gpit is correct.

In 1997, Masatoshi Nei (根井正利?), Professor of Biology at Pennsylvania State University, claimed "clusters" of "genetic distances" conform to the "customary" "three major races of man, namely, Negroids, Caucasoids and Mongoloids".[52] Moreover, Nei claimed that "Mongoloid populations irrespective of north and south" show "small genetic distances from any populations in Oceania and Americas".[52] Nei claimed the "Northern Mongoloid" included the "Evens", "Buryat", "Hui", "Mongolian", "Tibetan", "Japanese", "Ainu", "Northern Chinese" and "Korean".[52] In the "Southern Mongoloid", Nei included the "Dong", "Zhuang", "Southern Chinese", "Taiwanese-aborigines", "Thai", "Indonesian" and "Filipino".[52] Based on genetic data, Nei claimed the "Amerindians" descend from two populations: an original "Northeast Asians" migration which became the "Paleo-Indian" and a later migration which became both the "Na-Dene" and "Eskimos".[52] Based on the genetic data, Nei claimed "Southeast Asian Mongoloids" are closer to the "Micronesian" and "Polynesian" than to the "Papuan" and "Australian".[52] In 1993, Nei claimed the "Mongoloids" were contained within a larger genetic grouping called the "Greater Asians" or "Greater Mongoloids"[52] which also included "Pacific Islanders" and "Australopapuans".[53] In the "Australopapuan" grouping, Nei included "Dravidians", "Andamanese", "Australian", "Paupuan" and "Philippine Negritos".[53] Since Nei found Australopapuans were "most closely related to East Asians", Nei offered an explanation for their peculiar traits. Nei rejected the hypothesis that Australopapuans have traits of "black Africans" due to "convergent-evolution", since he estimated it would have taken far longer for them to have re-evolved "frizzled-hair".[53] Nei supported the other hypothesis put forward by Chris B. Stringer of the Paleontology Department of the National History Museum that there were two pouplations and that the original "African" population had "absorbed most of its gene pool from the Mongoloid group".[53]
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom