Hindus the real minorities in their own mother land India.

[TejasMk3]

Good this Money must be spent on Madarsaa modernization Program & also Temple control needs to go ASAP

Madarassa with tight control on the syllabus, just to make sure.

Freeing up temples will probably be the biggest thing the govt can do, but I dont really know....politicians make so much cash out of temples that they dont want to let go. Even temple lands are frequently leased out at low rates, or sometimes even sold for cheap Hopefully it can be done, if not through govt, through courts.
Even one free temple has done so much, in terms of utilizing it's revenues for schools/colleges and many other charities, you wont have to go outside. (there are a few in my state..became private trusts after long court battles)

Now couple that with reform of RTE....will be awesome!

 

[ArsalanKhan21]

like Haj subsidies

The Hajj subsidies are actually hidden financial aid to state owned Air India. Since 130,000 passengers fly Air India to Saudi Arabia annually for Hajj. The Hajj subsidies are against Islam since pilgrim must have financial means to perform Hajj. You cannot go to pilgrimage with debt and aid. Pakistan does not provide any Hajj subsidies to Pakistani Muslims going to Hajj.

 

[Ind4Ever]

It is just tip of an ice berg . There are lots media propaganda on why Cow slaughter d hold be banned just because hindus sentiments are hurt ? Seriously ? If any one talked the truth about conversation with abuse if money it becomes sensitive.

So what it means ?

 

[SQ8]

What about the Indus Valley Civilization?

The only religion that is actually native to India and wholly developed in house is Sikhism. The rest all came in.

 

[Ind4Ever]

While I totally agree that Indian "secularism" is not secularism with BS like Haj subsidies, separate laws for Muslims and other religious nonsense done by the state, do you really think that its a good idea by going one step ahead (Abolishing special treatment) and three steps backward at the same time (Throwing away the idea of separation between state and religion) and spitting on the fact that India is a modern nation state in the 21st century globalized world?

And for the millionth time: Stop comparing rape statistics... there are too many factors which need to be taken into consideration. Especially the fact that we have archaic laws which allow marital rape.

Yes . And I don't understand Ur point . Are you saying since we have many minorities and since we are modern India so we must fake our Real history of our Mother land. And why is it so wrong to recognise India as hindu nation ? Even with glorious path , historical evidence and with 80% of majority are hindus . Is this called Secularism ? Or appeasement of minorities ?

Please tell me

What about the Indus Valley Civilization?

The only religion that is actually native to India and wholly developed in house is Sikhism. The rest all came in.

Indus Valley Civilization is just a part of history . Our civilisation timeline goes beyond that . Just for an example Lord Krishna city of Dwaraka found under the water. Search was carried on the basis of Hindu scripts . Our scripts speaks about Saraswati River . Which which got dried up between 12000-11000 BCE . So I belive our civilisation started Wat beyond our imagination

 

[scholseys]

Hindus playing the victim card

 

[Don Badass]

What about the Indus Valley Civilization?

The only religion that is actually native to India and wholly developed in house is Sikhism. The rest all came in.

Hinduism originated in India, post-Indus Valley Civilization (part of which was in modern day India, anyway)

Jainism also originated in India

 

[Koovie]

Yes . And I don't understand Ur point . Are you saying since we have many minorities and since we are modern India so we must fake our Real history of our Mother land. And why is it so wrong to recognise India as hindu nation ? Even with glorious path , historical evidence and with 80% of majority are hindus . Is this called Secularism ? Or appeasement of minorities ?

What has secularism to do with not accepting ones history?

Do you know what secularism means?
And if you look at India`s history, you will see that its shaped by many religions, cultures, people, languages etc etc etc

 

[haviZsultan]

This mindset is actually dangerous. How are Hindus victims in their own homeland. Such insecurity we see in these small minded people.

Secularism is a system that offers equal rights for all and promises an Egalitarian society. Abandoning these principles can be detrimental for any society. The Hindus that want Hindu rashtra will not be happy once they get. Next will be the turn of dalits and others to suffer.

 

[Jay12345]

Hindus are delusional creatures

 

[Ragnar]

Hindutva whining is sometimes mildly amusing, but mostly irritating.

 

[SQ8]

our civilisation started Wat beyond our imagination

And there you make the important point that the one who wrote the article, those idiotic hindu nationalists commenting on it.. and even many Pakistanis dont understand.
This is NOT a Hindu country, it is NOT a Muslim country or land. There is a great distinction between the Hindu people and the Hindu religion. The Muslims in India(and a lot in Pakistan) are from the same gene pool, the Sikhs are from the same gene pool, the Jain, the Buddhists, the Christians and everyone else. Therefore Hindus are NOT a minority at all and it is not their country. It NEVER belonged to any religion but to various ethnicities; the religions have changed over millennia in the land... it was the IVCs religion at one point, at some point Hinduism(or its early form), Buddhism.. Jainism.. More Hindus and Jains.. Islam.. all of these except from Sikhism came in from elsewhere and evolved to a unique local flavour. But in all of these religions, the people who converted to it remained the same... they are still here and it is their land.
So while the likes of Raj Thakrey can cry about Maharashtra being invaded by people from other states he may have a point.. he does not like other ethnicities in his state which would make sense as certain lands belong to certain ethnicities; but he will/is an idiot if he claims the same about a religious invasion.

 

[Ind4Ever]

I am so tired of these Hindutvas who moan and b!tch everyday about how Hindus have been suffering since independence. That too when they elected Hindu leaders to govern India in the past. The best solution would be to carve out a Hindu state for them where they can create a land of milk and honey without moaning and groaning about minorities everyday. Then they can fcuk off and leave the rest of India to progress in peace as a secular united nation !

We already gave separate land for muslims . So basically , ethically , intellectually India was given from hindus and Pakistan Bangladesh were given for the muslims .

 

[jamahir]

@Reashot Xigwin

superb signature. you have my support.

 

[Ind4Ever]

And there you make the important point that the one who wrote the article, those idiotic hindu nationalists commenting on it.. and even many Pakistanis dont understand.
This is NOT a Hindu country, it is NOT a Muslim country or land. There is a great distinction between the Hindu people and the Hindu religion. The Muslims in India(and a lot in Pakistan) are from the same gene pool, the Sikhs are from the same gene pool, the Jain, the Buddhists, the Christians and everyone else. Therefore Hindus are NOT a minority at all and it is not their country. It NEVER belonged to any religion but to various ethnicities; the religions have changed over millennia in the land... it was the IVCs religion at one point, at some point Hinduism(or its early form), Buddhism.. Jainism.. More Hindus and Jains.. Islam.. all of these except from Sikhism came in from elsewhere and evolved to a unique local flavour. But in all of these religions, the people who converted to it remained the same... they are still here and it is their land.
So while the likes of Raj Thakrey can cry about Maharashtra being invaded by people from other states he may have a point.. he does not like other ethnicities in his state which would make sense as certain lands belong to certain ethnicities; but he will/is an idiot if he claims the same about a religious invasion.

How this country don't belongs to Hindus ? And people were not hindu when every single Kingdom of Indian subcontinent worshiped hindu gods.

The name hindu might be new . But the culture and way of life remained the same for many 10000s of years. I gave you a small example of Dwaraka which got sunk in 24000 BCE . Latest scientific evidence are there. If a civilisation which was ruled by Hindu God Krishna was found to be sunken before 26000 years ago near gujarat . Then how come India is not a Hindu nation ? And why people wr not Hindus


Kindly explain your logic. This is my point . Look what you are doing . Trying to fake our nations history just because minorities won't like it ?