What's new

Hindu woman wants to marry Muslim, sent to Nari Niketan

I just came back from Pakistan via Dubai. The plane was full of South Indians AYEYOO RAMA TYPE OF PEOPLE. There was an Indian couple(senior citizens) sitting right next to me. I guess they were Tamils because husband was wearing white DHOTI along with white dress shirt and his wife was wearing sarhi. During the flight, airhostess asked him what would you like to drink sir? He pointed out at the Budweiser can. BABA got TUN right after two sips. He tried to unlock his seatbelt but failed. I felt bad and offered him help. As soon as I unlocked his belt, he starts leaning towards me. I mistakenly asked him BABA JEE KITHAY JAA RAHAY O? He said I am drunk. His wife asked me if I can help them till this journey ends. I took him to washroom atleast four time. When we got to U.S, I saw him looking for his luggage. I guess BABA JEE was still tun and nobody was offering them any help so I decided to help them with their luggage. Jaisay he BABA JEE NAY MUGHAY DEKHA UNHOON NAY DOONNO HAATH JOOR KAAR MUGH SAY AIRF AIK BAAT KAHEE PLEASE HELP. I SWEAR I GRABBED HIS HANDS AND SAID YOU DON'T NEED TO DO THAT. THEY HAD 8 BAGS ALL TOGETHER. MORAL OF THE STORY IS THAT YOU HAVE TO BE NICE TO PEOPLE BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHEN YOU MAY NEED THEM TOMORROW

That was very nice of you.
 
.
:lol: Levina your Post is NO 5 the opening post is by an India so it comes to only 3 posts by Pakistanis when you were exclaiming about "LARGE NUMBER OF PAKISTANIS POSTS" :P

you Indians na bas had ha .

anyway a relation of 12 years ell they must get married and he should treat both equally if he cant he should be kicked
Tu line maar lay bachi pay. Woh aik shareef bachi hai. Iss say paehlay tu meeri laa shaa kay haath mein pharaee, I must say just kidding brother.

That was very nice of you.
You know what? I may be in that stage since nobody know how long one will live. I felt like they are one of my own. Thanks for your appreciation.
 
. . .
Gosh!
Looking at the number of Pakistani posts on this thread I got confused if the news was from India.
By god I had to recheck if Allahbad exists in Pakistan. :agree::agree::agree:

On topic:
This guy is already married, I'm not surprised that the lady's parents stopped her from getting married to him.
The title is misleading!!!

Why everything is miss leaded in India only. (Main karoon to sala character dhela hai)

Save the girl from being a victim of love Jhihad.

So freedom of rights is based on Indian mentality. Two love birds wants to live together, let them live and don't make it bullshit religion etc etc
 
.
Hindu woman wants to marry Muslim, sent to Nari Niketan
The court said there was nothing in the police report to justify apprehension of a law and order situation, although people from two religions were involved.
2213Google +0
  • Comments (0)
  • Prashant Pandey| Allahabad |Published on:May 28, 2015 12:17 am
    The Allahabad High Court has ordered the immediate release of a woman from the Nari Niketan in Amroha district, where she was detained for a month on the orders of the sub-divisional magistrate (SDM).

    The woman, Kanchan Verma, and her friend, Nasir Ali, were detained by the police on April 27 under Section 151 (breach of peace) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) outside a school under Gajraula police station area of Amroha district. The woman is a teacher at the school.

    According to reports, a mob had gathered outside the school when Verma’s parents tried to stop her from going with Ali, a married man. While the couple reportedly know each other for the last 12 years, her family opposed their relationship as they belong to different religions. Ali later submitted before the court that he would like to marry Verma.


    The couple were produced before the SDM of Dhanaura area. The SDM sent Ali to judicial custody and Verma to Nari Niketan till further orders. Ali was later released on bail.

    During her stay in Nari Niketan, Verma approached the high court with a habeas corpus petition, seeking her release on various grounds including restrictions on her from attending school, and being made to stay with juveniles in inhospitable conditions.

    Passing the order on Tuesday, a division bench of Justices Tarun Agarwala and Amar Singh Chauhan said: “The right to life and personal liberty is the most precious right of a human being, which is governed by the rule of law. The Constitution is the rule of law. No one can rise above the rule of law in the Constitution. The executive cannot deprive a person of his life or personal liberty without authority of law.”

    Criticising the SDM’s order, the court said: “We find that even after recording the statement of the petitioner that she is an adult, a divorcee and wants to live with a person of her choice, there was no occasion for the magistrate to detain her in a Nari Niketan. This order, in our opinion, is patently without any authority of law. We are of the opinion that personal liberty in such a high-handed manner cannot be curtailed merely on an apprehension, especially, when such an apprehension was not in existence. We are of the opinion that the liberty to move, mix, mingle, talk, share through company cannot be substantially curtailed and the action taken was totally violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.”

    The court said there was nothing in the police report to justify apprehension of a law and order situation, although people from two religions were involved. It said Section 144




    (prohibiting unlawful assembly on apprehension of breach of peace) of the CrPC could have been invoked if required. The court directed the police to escort the woman to her parents’ house, adding that she was free to choose the next course of action. - See more at: Hindu woman wants to marry Muslim, sent to Nari Niketan | The Indian Express | Page 2
True secularism...Kudos to Indian authorities and agencies....I hope the decision will be same in case of hindu boy and muslim girl....
 
.
Like this is indian secularism, that their gov interferes in ppl'a marriage decisions.

India never disappoints and indian trolls on pdf as well. The rants of pakistanis posting here are pretty pathetic. But then whatelse to expect from these.
Oh btw in this post ihad meant by 'rants of pakistanis,' the indian's rants and idiotic complaining of pakistanis posting in this thread. Quite pathetic. Its a pakistani forum,pakistanis will definitely post here, u got issue then move over to ur bharat chak chak.
 
. . .
Muslim women aren't even allowed to marry non-muslims, so I don't see the big deal when it's reciprocated by others.
Tell me how this reciprocation logic works here?
U are sucha horrible troll.

How gov is allowed to interfere?

No mater whatever is the faith of u indians, ur hate for muslims is always a common thing.
 
.
Tell me how this reciprocation logic works here?
U are sucha horrible troll.

How gov is allowed to interfere?

No mater whatever is the faith of u indians, ur hate for muslims is always a common thing.

:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo: You're delusional. Don't quote me ever again I don't want to pollute myself by associating with you.
 
. .
:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo: You're delusional. Don't quote me ever again I don't want to pollute myself by associating with you.
Associating with me. Like how. Lets just hear?
Who wants u to associate urself with us, and then what are u doing on pakistani forum, u troll.
 
.
Hindu woman wants to marry Muslim, sent to Nari Niketan
The court said there was nothing in the police report to justify apprehension of a law and order situation, although people from two religions were involved.
2213Google +0
  • Comments (0)
  • Prashant Pandey| Allahabad |Published on:May 28, 2015 12:17 am
    The Allahabad High Court has ordered the immediate release of a woman from the Nari Niketan in Amroha district, where she was detained for a month on the orders of the sub-divisional magistrate (SDM).

    The woman, Kanchan Verma, and her friend, Nasir Ali, were detained by the police on April 27 under Section 151 (breach of peace) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) outside a school under Gajraula police station area of Amroha district. The woman is a teacher at the school.

    According to reports, a mob had gathered outside the school when Verma’s parents tried to stop her from going with Ali, a married man. While the couple reportedly know each other for the last 12 years, her family opposed their relationship as they belong to different religions. Ali later submitted before the court that he would like to marry Verma.


    The couple were produced before the SDM of Dhanaura area. The SDM sent Ali to judicial custody and Verma to Nari Niketan till further orders. Ali was later released on bail.

    During her stay in Nari Niketan, Verma approached the high court with a habeas corpus petition, seeking her release on various grounds including restrictions on her from attending school, and being made to stay with juveniles in inhospitable conditions.

    Passing the order on Tuesday, a division bench of Justices Tarun Agarwala and Amar Singh Chauhan said: “The right to life and personal liberty is the most precious right of a human being, which is governed by the rule of law. The Constitution is the rule of law. No one can rise above the rule of law in the Constitution. The executive cannot deprive a person of his life or personal liberty without authority of law.”

    Criticising the SDM’s order, the court said: “We find that even after recording the statement of the petitioner that she is an adult, a divorcee and wants to live with a person of her choice, there was no occasion for the magistrate to detain her in a Nari Niketan. This order, in our opinion, is patently without any authority of law. We are of the opinion that personal liberty in such a high-handed manner cannot be curtailed merely on an apprehension, especially, when such an apprehension was not in existence. We are of the opinion that the liberty to move, mix, mingle, talk, share through company cannot be substantially curtailed and the action taken was totally violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.”

    The court said there was nothing in the police report to justify apprehension of a law and order situation, although people from two religions were involved. It said Section 144




    (prohibiting unlawful assembly on apprehension of breach of peace) of the CrPC could have been invoked if required. The court directed the police to escort the woman to her parents’ house, adding that she was free to choose the next course of action. - See more at: Hindu woman wants to marry Muslim, sent to Nari Niketan | The Indian Express | Page 2
Its funny that the family has an issue with the guy being muslim and not have an issue with the fact that he is already married. Or may be the media just decided to play up the guy bein g muslim and not being a bigamist... but then again where would have been the story in that.
 
.
Associating with me. Like how. Lets just hear?
Who wants u to associate urself with us, and then what are u doing on pakistani forum, u troll.

What part of stop quoting me don't you understand? I don't want to talk to you.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom