Indus Pakistan
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 20,487
- Reaction score
- 182
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is the IAS officer who unearthed Robert Vadra's land dealing in Gurgaon.
Rakhigarhi is around 350-hectare (3.5 km2) making it the largest sindhu-Saraswati civilisation site in India, Pakistan & Afghanistan. I know why you're jealous.
A country where ppl dont give an inch of their land for the expansion of roads, do you think they would agree for relocation just so that a few archeologists could excavate a 5000yr old site? Next to impossible!!!
You're right AMT (Aryan migration theory) is accepted but not AIT (Aryan invasion theory). Whatever happened to Dravidans!!!
Can we discuss genetics on pdf??? lol
Who's that?
how would that help???
Genetic Change in Balochistan 400 years Ago ??I don't think genetics is banned here. Show gun rants about genetics day in and day out.
What happened to Dravidians?
Most got assimilated, some moved South.
A thing you should remember is that Population ratios are not static. When Aryans arrived in India, India was sparsely populated. There was a population explosion in India during Iron age when use of Iron made clearing of dense forests possible, hence bringing most of land under plough. At least until satvahanas, land was granted under finders-keepers rule in which if you clear a patch of forest and start cultivating it, it became yours.
It is due to this population explosion that Aryans were last major group to cause demographic change in India. By end of Iron age, population of India has increased to such an extent that no new migrant group could cause genetic change , except in some sparsely populated pockets (happened in Baluchistan just 400 years ago).
Also older civilizations were mostly based in deserts because , before the advent of Iron, it was not easy/possible to clear dense forests.
Genetic Change in Balochistan 400 years Ago ??
Can you plZ elaborate,thanks.
![]()
Sorry could not stop laughing after I read that word. I hope he's able to "unearth" something worthwhile in Rakhigarhi too.
Rakhigarhi is around 350-hectare (3.5 km2) making it the largest sindhu-Saraswati civilisation site in India, Pakistan & Afghanistan. I know why you're jealous.![]()
They should name their missiles and warships after Hindushahi kings,Raja Dahir,porus and Kushans like the great kanishka rather than those Muslims who persecuted and enslaved them.Baloch are not original inhabitants of Balochistan. They started migrating to Balochistan at the start of this millenium , and that migration ended only 300-400 years ago.
This is even on wikipedia.
loch people - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]
The best Pakistanis could do is squirm and post some article about a known pseudo-Historian whose theories have been proved wrong.
This won't change that this is a genuine archeological discovery by ASI and would be recognized as a UNESCO heritage site.
Poor Pakistanis, we are taking away whatever little identity they had to begin with. First it was Harappa then directly jump to Qasim, now they would have to start with Qasim himself. Poor Poor Pakistanis.
They should name their missiles and warships after Hindushahi kings,Raja Dahir,porus and Kushans like the great kanishka rather than those Muslims who persecuted and enslaved them.
TrueIdentity crisis dude, identity crisis.
Even Afghans make fun of these Pakistanis who glorify murderers of their Ancestors.
s/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/1511377/Pakistan-hijacked-our-heroes-says-Kabul.html"]Pakistan hijacked our heroes, says Kabul - Telegraph[/url]
just imagine the face of Atanz ...and all his hard work going to drain...
True
But except Indian subcontinent, no Muslims country dumped her past and achievements of their ancestors. For example
Iranians,turks,Indonesia etc they Even named their Airline GARUD.
Pakistanis should also adoption this and should be named
porus khan
Dahir Ali
![]()
Dr Vasant Shinde, vice-chancellor of the college and director of the Rakhigarhi excavation, on Saturday announced and as reported by Indian newspaper: “We want to study the DNA of the Harappan people and try to find out who they were. So we excavated the skeletons scientifically at Rakhigarhi. There was no contamination. All the four skeletons are in good condition.
The facial bones of two skeletons are intact. We are going to show the world how the Harappan man looked like. This will happen in July. It will be a breakthrough in Harappan studies.”
“…using the DNA to be extracted from the four full-sized skeletons excavated… and a novel software developed in South Korea, archaeologists of the Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, Pune, are confident of projecting, in a few months, how the Harappans looked like 4,500 years ago — their build, the colour of their skin or hair, their facial features and so on”.
The archaeologists of the Deccan institute, and Haryana’s Department of Archaeology, have stated that the skeletons belonged to the Mature Harappan period (2600 BCE-1900 BCE). The tests will be done by the college staff and forensic scientists of Seoul National University, South Korea.
I think Indians have realized that they can't shift Indus Valley into India, So now they came with theory of opposite drift of population.? So, How IVC people reached Haryana? Any trace in South India? Or they landed there directly from Mars?
You gotta be kidding me. The altars found in some of harappan cities were same as those found in Kerala,which 're still in use. It was Michel Danino who said this, the man who is credited for researching extensively in this fieldThat argument is a bit of a leap. there is no real evidence of any "Dravidian" presence in north India, all there are are leaps of imagination.
.
Well they moved both eastwards and southwards. There is evidence of desertion in stage VII of harappan cities and this coincides with the time when Saraswati dried up.Most got assimilated, some moved South.
A thing you should remember is that Population ratios are not static. When Aryans arrived in India, India was sparsely populated because most of the land was uninhabitable due to dense forest cover. There was a population explosion in India during Iron age when use of Iron made clearing of dense forests possible, hence bringing most of land under plough. At least until satvahanas, land was granted under finders-keepers rule in which if you clear a patch of forest and start cultivating it, it became yours.
It is due to this population explosion that Aryans were last major group to cause demographic change in India. By end of Iron age, population of India has increased to such an extent that no new migrant group could cause genetic change , except in some sparsely populated pockets (happened in Baluchistan just 400 years ago).
Also older civilizations were mostly based in deserts because , before the advent of Iron, it was not easy/possible to clear dense forests.Even older settlements like one found in Bihar, are at confluence of Ganga, Ghagra, and Son where floods have cleared out a substantial area.
Are you denying the fact that Rakhigarhi is the biggest Harappan site ever found???This is another out of India theoryOnly Indians will believe
You gotta be kidding me. The altars found in some of harappan cities were same as those found in Kerala,which 're still in use. I am not saying it, but Michel Danino who is credited for researching extensively in this field.
View attachment 218782
Well they moved both eastwards and southwards. There is evidence of desertion in stage VII of harappan cities and this coincides with the time when Saraswati dried up.
And somehow I am not sure what was happening down south 5000yrs back. I'm sure you must 've heard of Brahui language which is a Dravidan language spoken in Baluchistan region of Af-Pak.
Why dont you create your own thread so that I can occasionally refer to it? Lol