What's new

Harvard professor among three charged with lying about Chinese government ties

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
(CNN)A Harvard University professor and two other Chinese nationals were federally indicted in three separate cases for allegedly lying to the US about their involvement with China's government, the US attorney for the district of Massachusetts announced Tuesday.

Federal authorities told reporters the cases highlighted the "ongoing threat" posed by China using "nontraditional collectors" like academics and researchers to steal American research and technology.

Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, who is the chair of Harvard's Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department, is accused of lying about working with several Chinese organizations, where he collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from Chinese entities, US Attorney Andrew Lelling said at a news conference.


According to court documents, Lieber's research group at Harvard had received over $15 million in funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense, which requires disclosing foreign financial conflicts of interests.

The complaint alleges that Lieber had lied about his affiliation with the Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and a contract he had with a Chinese talent recruitment plan to attract high-level scientists to the country.

He was being paid $50,000 per month by the Chinese university and given $1.5 million to establish a nanoscience research lab at WUT, the complaint said.

CNN has reached out to an attorney for Lieber. In a statement, Harvard called the charges "extremely serious."

"Harvard is cooperating with federal authorities, including the National Institutes of Health, and is conducting its own review of the alleged misconduct," the university said in a statement. "Professor Lieber has been placed on indefinite administrative leave."

In a separate indictment unsealed Tuesday, Yanqing Ye, a 29-year-old Chinese national, was charged with visa fraud, making false statements, conspiracy and being an unregistered agent, the US attorney's office said.

Yanqing had falsely identified herself as a "student" on her visa application and lied about her military service while she was employed as a scientific researcher at Boston University, according to the indictment. She admitted to federal officers during an April 2019 interview that she held the rank of lieutenant with the People's Liberation Army, court documents show.

Yanqing is accused of accessing US military websites and sending US documents and information to China, according to documents.

Last week, a cancer researcher, Zaosong Zheng, was indicted for trying to smuggle 21 vials of biological material out of the US to China and lying about it to federal investigators, Lelling said.

Zaosong, 30, whose entry was sponsored by Harvard University, had hidden the vials in a sock before boarding the plane, according to Lelling.

"This is not an accident or a coincidence. This is a small sample of China's ongoing campaign to siphon off American technology and know-how for Chinese gain," Lelling said.

Lelling said Boston is a target for this "kind of exploitation" because of its universities, hospitals, research institutions and tech companies in the area.


Lieber is scheduled to appear later Tuesday afternoon in federal court in Boston. Yanqing is currently in China.

Zaosong was arrested and charged last month. He has been detained since December 30.

CNN has reached out to an attorney Zaosong. It was not immediately clear if Yanqing had a lawyer.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/poli...chinese-nationals-arrest-espionage/index.html
 
.
These are exaggerated charges as part of a larger plan to introduce mutual suspicion between American and Chinese researchers and research institutions. By going after a department chair of Harvard University the government is sending a strong message that collaboration with China must be curtailed across all academia.
 
.
If all ethnic Chinese researchers and Chinese students leave US, I wonder how much it would hurt US science and technology. And how much it would help China.
 
. .
None.


A lot.

Bottom line is that you guys exaggerate your impact on US technology sector.
However, all those Chinese students/scholars are not vn refugee like you who have ZERO contribution to the US technology...
Check this guy's group picture or you can go to any professor's group websites to see who are the real brain power for those scientific achievements:
0

In case you illiterate vn refugee don't know who is this guy, google 'John B. Goodenough'...
Random professor group websites:
https://chemistry.harvard.edu/people/labs/lieber-group?page=1
 
Last edited:
.
If all ethnic Chinese researchers and Chinese students leave US, I wonder how much it would hurt US science and technology. And how much it would help China.
How many chinese work for US technology companies as Cisco, Google, Microsoft etc?

you overstate your importance!
 
.
However, all those Chinese students/scholars are not vn refugee like you who have ZERO contribution to the US technology...
Check this guy's group picture or you can go to any professor's group websites to see who are the real brain power for those scientific achievements:
0

In case you illiterate vn refugee don't know who is this guy, google 'John B. Goodenough'...

Have you done any research work for any project or University?

If you do, you will know the benefit is mutual, you also learn from research and there are some breakthrough you cannot access them in China in the first place.

Before you ask "if these Chinese Researcher return to China" You need to ask why they go to America to do the research in the first place? And trust me, for some research position in the US, other people will laugh out very loud if these Chinese Researcher do indeed return home, because that will open a door to them for the spot.
 
.
Have you done any research work for any project or University?

If you do, you will know the benefit is mutual, you also learn from research and there are some breakthrough you cannot access them in China in the first place.

Before you ask "if these Chinese Researcher return to China" You need to ask why they go to America to do the research in the first place? And trust me, for some research position in the US, other people will laugh out very loud if these Chinese Research do indeed return home, because that will open a door to them for the spot.
Very good question: why superpower chinese leave their country in the first place?
 
. . .
Ok maybe they don’t want to be infected by the wuhan virus?

Ha ha

Well, one thing you want to or try to expose the Chinese own agenda, but another thing to draw a natural disaster into the fray, Wuhan virus is not a joke or some punch line, I hope you know that...
 
.
You need to ask why they go to America to do the research in the first place?
It's all about "Matthew Effect". "The rich get richer and the poor get poorer". It also applies to science. Democracy and freedom is not an issue here.
 
.
It's all about "Matthew Effect". "The rich get richer and the poor get poorer". It also applies to science. Democracy and freedom is not an issue here.

This is not about democracy or freedom or being rich. It is about the opportunities vs talent.

It's nothing if you only have talent but not opportunities, but on the other hand, talent is not a pre-requisite if you have a whole street of talent lining up in the street.

US is probably one of the few country that allow civilian to participate on Military or related research, if you were to do it in China, you would need to have a military background. That's what open knowledge is about. And this is something China do not have.
 
.
Well, one thing you want to or try to expose the Chinese own agenda, but another thing to draw a natural disaster into the fray, Wuhan virus is not a joke or some punch line, I hope you know that...
ok no joke on the virus

chinese in general are good in memorizing but many of them are day dreamers, not in practical use that is necessary in real harsh western world.

I still working in the field I studied long ago, whereas my chinese fellow - a native from Shanghai - since years trying to survive by selling print jobs such as gift calendars to german business.
 
.
ok no joke on the virus

chinese in general are good in memorizing but they are mostly dreamers, not in practical use that is necessary in real harsh western world.

I still working in the field I studied long ago, whereas my chinese fellow since years trying to survive by selling print jobs such as gift calendars to german business.

That's because the aforementioned open knowledge. China have what we called a "Prescribed" knowledge, which mean you learn them by basically studying. On the other hand, The west focus on applied knowledge. Basically you research one thing and you will unlock a whole bunch of stuff.

The research prospect in China is not nearly as good as in the west, that is why most Chinese Researcher rather go to the west and preform the research there, but not staying in China.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom