Hamdard India head on why Rooh Afza is an Indian drink: ‘It is older than Pakistan and Bangladesh’

[bharat62]

Okay, show me your ROI passport from a thousand years ago.
The problem with you people is that you gas light everyone into thinking that "India" as a region and the "Republic of India" are the something.
Stop lying to yourself and the world, Your country and Pakistan didn't exist before 47.
The rest is you just covering yourself in the menstrual blood of the British Raj, the Mughals, Delhi sultanate, etc.

Drink indian rooh afza , you can not change India . It is secular despite minor disturbances .

It tastes like drinking cough syrup

It is not advisable to drink it in concentrated form. It is a sherbat to be miced with water .

 

[SabzShaheen]

Okay, show me your ROI passport from a thousand years ago.
The problem with you people is that you gas light everyone into thinking that "India" as a region and the "Republic of India" are the something.
Stop lying to yourself and the world, Your country and Pakistan didn't exist before 47.
The rest is you just covering yourself in the menstrual blood of the British Raj, the Mughals, Delhi sultanate, etc.

Perfect except how dare you analogise rooh afzah to

 

[Rusty2]

Drink indian rooh afza , you can not change India . It is secular despite minor disturbances .


It is not advisable to drink it in concentrated form. It is a sherbat to be miced with water .

so you have no response. Thought so.

 

[Destranator]

On the basis of that logic surely the drink is british as what is now india was part of the british Raj.

Happy for the Brits to "re-claim" it. Maybe Charles III can douse his crown in Rooh Afza to add flavour to the Royal atmosphere.

It tastes like drinking cough syrup

At least cough syrup is useful.

 

[LakeHawk180]

Okay, show me your ROI passport from a thousand years ago.
The problem with you people is that you gas light everyone into thinking that "India" as a region and the "Republic of India" are the something.
Stop lying to yourself and the world, Your country and Pakistan didn't exist before 47.
The rest is you just covering yourself in the menstrual blood of the British Raj, the Mughals, Delhi sultanate, etc.

I think everyone except few insecure pakistanis consider india as a nation of immense history, culture and diversity.

Pretty much how history — and claim to history works. While many kingdoms existed, the people of India never changed (most stay where they have been since time immemorial). Their identity and heritage doesn’t change. So when india is finally one contiguous area, all their historical and cultural identities coalesce into “Indian history” and that is a their right.

By your logic, no country can claim their ancient history unless they are colonisers

Pakistan hasn’t been very successful in this aspect mostly because you have an Arab fetish, reject your own “pagan” history and then occasionally tries to unilaterally claim all of “Indus Valley civilisation” like a bunch of idiots.

 

[bharat62]

so you have no response. Thought so.

Very simple rooh afza is indian brand , india is very old civilization , we are a secular democratic state with a written constitution .

 

[Rusty2]

I think everyone except few insecure pakistanis consider india as a nation of immense history, culture and diversity.

Pretty much how history — and claim to history works. While many kingdoms existed, the people of India never changed (most stay where they have been since time immemorial). Their identity and heritage doesn’t change. So when india is finally one contiguous area, all their historical and cultural identities coalesce into “Indian history” and that is a their right.

By your logic, no country can claim their ancient history unless they are colonisers

Pakistan hasn’t been very successful in this aspect mostly because you have an Arab fetish, reject your own “pagan” history and then occasionally tries to unilaterally claim all of “Indus Valley civilisation” like a bunch of idiots.

None of what you said is even remotely true.
ROI has no history pre 47 and "India" has no history as a "nation" but only as a region.
It's like saying Europe is an ancient country..... No one in their right mind will say that.
The issue is that you people cover yourself in the menstrual blood of former empires in the subcontinent and then pretend you are some ancient nations.

Very simple rooh afza is indian brand , india is very old civilization , we are a secular democratic state with a written constitution .

lol, none of that is true.

 

[Maula Jatt]

I think everyone except few insecure pakistanis consider india as a nation of immense history, culture and diversity.

Pretty much how history — and claim to history works. While many kingdoms existed, the people of India never changed (most stay where they have been since time immemorial). Their identity and heritage doesn’t change. So when india is finally one contiguous area, all their historical and cultural identities coalesce into “Indian history” and that is a their right.

By your logic, no country can claim their ancient history unless they are colonisers

Pakistan hasn’t been very successful in this aspect mostly because you have an Arab fetish, reject your own “pagan” history and then occasionally tries to unilaterally claim all of “Indus Valley civilisation” like a bunch of idiots.

Typical donkey like response that literally didn't answer even one of his points directly - India region, like Europe or whatever- you have historical regions like Tamil history, Bangali history, or Hindustani history etc
India the nation state - 47

But retardation is what I expect from your kind so no worries

Be careful what you wish for the last part, you seethe the most when nationalists do that lol

 

[Maula Jatt]

None of what you said is even remotely true.
ROI has no history pre 47 and "India" has no history as a "nation" but only as a region.
It's like saying Europe is an ancient country..... No one in their right mind will say that.
The issue is that you people cover yourself in the menstrual blood of former empires in the subcontinent and then pretend you are some ancient nations.


lol, none of that is true.

Dude I have seen Indians lose thier absolute shit when a pakistani nationalist goes and puts our people's history as ours - cause a chunk of "Indian"(which in some ways it is but has nothing to do with nation state of India founded in 47 named after a big region like Europe etc) history is from our region, Panini to chanakya to charaka to taxila university to a chunk of veda's to IVC and can go on and on with it

The Arab BS is just a slur for being Muslims- they'd get slapped the shitt outta for it IRL by a true man but it is what it is, internet is that place for em

in reality they actually hate when pakistani nationalists pull up with that stuff cause they're in their delusions of everything in south Asia = modern state of India founded in 47 thus will seethe like no TMR when you actually do exactly what they're asking you to do

 

[Rusty2]

Dude I have seen Indians lose thier absolute shit when a pakistani nationalist goes and puts our people's history as ours - cause a chunk of "Indian"(which in some ways it is but has nothing to do with nation state of India founded in 47 named after a big region like Europe etc) history is from our region, Panini to chanakya to charaka to taxila university to a chunk of veda's to IVC and can go on and on with it

The Arab BS is just a slur for being Muslims- they'd get slapped the shitt outta for it IRL by a true man but it is what it is, internet is that place for em

in reality they actually hate when pakistani nationalists pull up with that stuff cause they're in their delusions of everything in south Asia = modern state of India founded in 47 thus will seethe like no TMR when you actually do exactly what they're asking you to do

It's not their fault, they are a victim of poor education, Hindu nationalism, and lack of females due to Hindu practice of female infanticide.
All that combines into them not having the IQ to distinguish between a national state that was started in 47 and an ancient geographic region. Which funny enough they didn't even name themselves, it was named by invaders (the Greeks).

 

[JackTheRipper]

Jaam e Shireen and Big Apple, Sheezan are better than Rooh Afza,

I remember 2 decades ago, when i drink Simba of PEPSI, mostly people were drinking Sheezan, it was national product of Pakistan, and it can beat any international product, but ugly gay mullah started campaign, it is product of Qadiyanis.

 

[PakistaniandProud]

I've heard that this Pakistani drink is popular in parts of the Middle East, is there truth to this?

 

[lastofthepatriots]

I've heard that this Pakistani drink is popular in parts of the Middle East, is there truth to this?

False. Indian khus sharbat is however popular in the Middle East.

 

[fitpOsitive]

Rooh Afza and Khus Syrup suck shit.. used to drink it in milk as a kid.. find it horrible and nauseating now.

Most probably you have crossed your 35th year of life. And the issue with the syrup might be due to sensitivity to the herbs used in making Rooh Afza.

@Destranator I think in Pakistan we drink this one more than rooh afza
View attachment 879797

Jam e sherin is better. I also think that.

 

[lastofthepatriots]

Most probably you have crossed your 35th year of life. And the issue with the syrup might be due to sensitivity to the herbs used in making Rooh Afza.


Jam e sherin is better. I also think that.

Sharbat literally translates to syrup but whatever.

If you want to know what truly tastes like cough syrup, it’s that red color sting that the kids drink these days. It was the worst drink I’ve ever tasted in my life. Rather just drink a coke.