MirageBlue
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Messages
- 1,118
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
You're assuming the Tejas will get within 15km of JF-17. In WVR turn fight, it's anyone's game.
My original point stands, Block I/II JF-17 have MAWS capability, Tejas does not.
Actually it can fire the Python V at near BVR ranges, which is ~20-25 km.
15 km would be the bubble of NEZ where any target is extremely vulnerable.
The Bison flown by Wing Cmdr Abhinandan got within visual range of the F-16 at which he fired the R-73E. So, never assume that WVR combat won't happen. If that were the case, Air Forces wouldn't expend so much money and effort into getting top of the line WVRAAMs integrated.
Tejas Mk1A is going to get the MAWS. Which will be ported over to the 40 Tejas Mk1s once development for the Mk1A is complete.
Importantly, even WITHOUT a MAWS, a pilot can be made aware of a missile launched at him..AEW&C and AWACS both have the capability to detect a missile launch and warn their fighters.
The JF-17 Block 1 and 2 don't have HMDS or PL-10. You guys don't even know WHICH HMDS will be used. And there is no roadmap for when these will be integrated, tested and then retrofitted on over 100 JF-17 Block 1 and 2s.
So in a visual range fight, the Tejas Mk1 is far more dangerous than the JF-17 Blk 1 and 2 since it can use the DASH HMDS and R-73E or Python V. JF-17 will use the older PL-5EII WVRAAM which is NOT a HOBS missile. It's off-bore capability is rather poor compared to the R-73E and not comparable to the ASRAAM or Python V.