Jungibaaz
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
- Messages
- 8,756
- Reaction score
- 113
- Country
- Location
In the sense of having committed them or shamelessly defending a country's record committing them that is true. What many U.S. congressmen are are excellent lawyers, well-able to distinguish fact from fantasy, shift evidence, and judge which acts qualify for prosecution and which do not.
Do you even aspire to reach that level? link
You're missing the point.
Balochistan unrest isn't the result of oppression as such, more to do with economic problems and power struggle between government and feudal war lords. There have been some cases of kidnappings and torture.
But these cases are rare and isolated, they certainly haven't occurred indiscriminately.
And on the issue of US congressmen, while they do hold the ability and experience in handling such cases.
They lack the moral fiber, the right to speak out against injustices.Their motive is certainly not humanitarian, there is always a hidden agenda involved in US foreign policy (with the exception of Israel).
Ah, the ultimate Pakistani response: "Baluchistan is ours to screw with and exploit as we will." And you wonder why your country has extreme problems concerning human rights? You're a part of it!
No, you've developed some statement of your own, selective judgement is what i'd call it.
Please enlighten me as to how we are 'screwing' and 'exploiting' and that too how it is against the will of the Baloch.