Had Operation Chengiz Khan not happened,could Bangladesh been created?

[bloo]

I was rather talking about the Indian move to expel your countrymen.

And when was that?

 

[INDIC]

Bangladesh was a disaster waiting to happen ever since Quaid-e-Azam accepted a Pakistan on either sides of India. I mean, you can have dedicated, patriotic citizens on either side for so long only especially when the feeling is that you are being deprived of your rights.

What do you mean by the word 'accepted', that was the only thing you were going to get.

 

[Thirdfront]

Is the above suppose to be anything worth a read? Perhaps you should go and read the meaning of 'border' and then meaning of 'Line of Control'!

Perhaps you should get us enlightened about it. Pakistan can raise a dispute about border (either agreed or de-facto) any time, for any reason. However, instead of approaching UN or international court if it tries to impose it's views on India, India has the right to do anything (be it crossing IB or LoC) it sees fit for self defence.
Anyways, you did not explain why pak forces were in Kashmir before Indian troops?

 

[Echo_419]

What do you mean by the word 'accepted', that was the only thing you were going to get.

Accepted toh aise keha raha hai jaise langaar bat raha hai

 

[INDIC]

Accepted toh aise keha raha hai jaise langaar bat raha hai

Inko laga tha khairat mein inko UP-Bihar bhi milne wala tha. After their daydream of getting UP-Bihar shattered many of them attacked and tried to kill Jinnah by chanting the slogan,"Toota phoota Pakistan nahi chaiye, Humein chaiye Pakistan Karachi se Calcutta tak." (confimed by Indian and Pakistani versions).

 

[Mav3rick]

Means you don't have the link to support this claim. Thanks

Actually, it means I cannot be bothered by your kind. And you are welcome!

What do you mean by the word 'accepted', that was the only thing you were going to get.

Actually, other options were on the table. However, they had conditions attached, most important of them was to accept Mountbatten as Governor General of Pakistan same as India. Jinnah refused.

In his recently released to public memoirs, it took even Mountbatten by surprise when Jinnah accepted a Pakistan on either side of India. Maybe Jinnah had too much faith in Muslim unity.

Perhaps you should get us enlightened about it. Pakistan can raise a dispute about border (either agreed or de-facto) any time, for any reason. However, instead of approaching UN or international court if it tries to impose it's views on India, India has the right to do anything (be it crossing IB or LoC) it sees fit for self defence.
Anyways, you did not explain why pak forces were in Kashmir before Indian troops?

Let me make it clear for you, Jammu Kashmir was, is and will remain a disputed territory until the matter is mutually resolved.....one way or the other.

Accepted toh aise keha raha hai jaise langaar bat raha hai

Jo bhi bata tha, teri side bhi line mei lagi thi.....par hamare baad number aaya tha us ka!

Inko laga tha khairat mein inko UP-Bihar bhi milne wala tha. After their daydream of getting UP-Bihar shattered many of them attacked and tried to kill Jinnah by chanting the slogan,"Toota phoota Pakistan nahi chaiye, Humein chaiye Pakistan Karachi se Calcutta tak." (confimed by Indian and Pakistani versions).

Khairat mei lia tha ya kisi ki ***** phaar ke liya tha, yeh to ab koi neutral hi decide ker sakta hai.

 

[ExtraOdinary]

Actually, it means I cannot be bothered by your kind. And you are welcome!

In need of some burnol?

 

[INDIC]

Actually, other options were on the table. However, they had conditions attached, most important of them was to accept Mountbatten as Governor General of Pakistan same as India. Jinnah refused.

LMAO what a crap. Do you know UP-Bihar were 80% Hindu majority, you weren't going to get even an inch of land from UP-Bihar after getting almost all Muslim majority districts. Dividing Bengal and Punjab was already in the partition plan which Jinnah initially refused but later had to except it.

In his recently released to public memoirs, it took even Mountbatten by surprise when Jinnah accepted a Pakistan on either side of India. Maybe Jinnah had too much faith in Muslim unity.

You forgetting the real truth that Muslim League only won in three provinces and stood at distant second after Indian National Congress.

Congress accepted partition because of the violence and the hurdle created by Muslim League in the formation of Constituent Assembly.

Khairat mei lia tha ya kisi ki ***** phaar ke liya tha, yeh to ab koi neutral hi decide ker sakta hai.

Now, you are talking opposite of your previous comment.

 

[Mav3rick]

LMAO what a crap. Do you know UP-Bihar were 80% Hindu majority, you weren't going to get even an inch of land from UP-Bihar after getting almost all Muslim majority districts. Dividing Bengal and Punjab was already in the partition plan which Jinnah initially refused but later had to except it.

The British were in absolute control, they were drawing the maps and partition lines, accepting their decisions was the only way forward, even if it meant sacrifice. Had Bangladesh been made a part of India, Punjab (all of it) could have been given to Pakistan etc.

But Pakistan on either side of India was just very very unfair.

You forgetting the real truth that Muslim League only won in three provinces and stood at distant second after Indian National Congress.

Congress accepted partition because of the violence and the hurdle created by Muslim League in the formation of Constituent Assembly.

I don't even know that and I will not bother going into it because that is pointless in this argument. ?Because, what if ML had won from 3 distinct different regions? 3 Pakistans?? At the end of the day, the logical conclusion would have been to provide equal land mass on a single side. You tell me, could India have held on to many of her states (some of which are still waging freedom struggle) had she been divided on either side of.....lets say, China??

Now, you are talking opposite of your previous comment.

Not really, the poster had attempted to assume the position of control, which was with the British. Congress would never have accepted division of the sub continent but had no option because of my comment!!

In need of some burnol?

Why, you opposed to self service???