What's new

H-6 Bomber: Low Attitude Flying

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
H-6 Bomber: Low Attitude Flying

1-20.jpg


2-15.jpg
 
Is landing dude.....

---------- Post added at 08:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 AM ----------

look at the tires too...
 
Inflected Form(s): flew \ˈflü\; flown \ˈflōn\; fly·ing
Etymology: Middle English flien, from Old English flēogan; akin to Old High German fliogan to fly and probably to Old English flōwan to flow
Date: before 12th century
intransitive verb
1 a : to move in or pass through the air with wings b : to move through the air or before the wind or through outer space c : to float, wave, or soar in the air <flags flying at half-mast>
 
Inflected Form(s): flew \&#712;flü\; flown \&#712;fl&#333;n\; fly·ing
Etymology: Middle English flien, from Old English fl&#275;ogan; akin to Old High German fliogan to fly and probably to Old English fl&#333;wan to flow
Date: before 12th century
intransitive verb
1 a : to move in or pass through the air with wings b : to move through the air or before the wind or through outer space c : to float, wave, or soar in the air <flags flying at half-mast>

By that logic every plane on the planet performs 'low altitude flying'
 
They do, don't they? How else do you take off and land?

Ehm... low altitude flying is when you fly below 2,100 feet for a prolonged period. Taking off and landing can hardly be considered "low altitude" flying. Ever wonder why a passenger aircraft pitches up 20 degrees after take-off?
 
Ehm... low altitude flying is when you fly below 2,100 feet for a prolonged period. Taking off and landing can hardly be considered "low altitude" flying. Ever wonder why a passenger aircraft pitches up 20 degrees after take-off?

Are you really being that pedantic? or are you just getting on his case because you didn't like what he posted about LTTE in the world affairs section?
 
Ehm... low altitude flying is when you fly below 2,100 feet for a prolonged period. Taking off and landing can hardly be considered "low altitude" flying. Ever wonder why a passenger aircraft pitches up 20 degrees after take-off?
The way it works is to either stretch the definition of whatever to the absurd or to demand everyone sticks to the strict technical definition. So yes...While you are correct on the context of 'low altitude' that does not include take-offs and landings, the strict definition that we see demanded is just another sign of someone busted of not knowing what the hell he is talking about.
 
Are you really being that pedantic? or are you just getting on his case because you didn't like what he posted about LTTE in the world affairs section?

No, everyone loved it lol

But hey, people are misinterpreting Kanna's post here. Check the title, it's about the attitude, and not the altitude. :P
 
No, everyone loved it lol

But hey, people are misinterpreting Kanna's post here. Check the title, it's about the attitude, and not the altitude. :P

Yeah I noticed that, but hell I think people are giving him a hard time over absolutely nothing. It's just some pictures.
 
Back
Top Bottom