This is no good for his position. Do you know the difference between what is studied in economics and what is in accountancy? They're completely, completely different fields, one not qualified to do the other's job. And in Ishaq Dar's case he is if we go solely by his field and area of experience, unqualified for the role.
These are hugely separate fields.
For example, you as a chartered accountant, can you, by what you've studied give me a critique or a sound analysis of Pakistan's current monetary policy and outlook in 2015 on this subject given current economic conditions and forecasts? And I mean in depth, like that which is expected of any economics graduate.
I cannot believe I have to defend a politician because he is senior to me in my profession
Agreed these two are pretty much different fields, I cannot give you in depth analysis of Pakistan's current monetary policy and outlook right now, but if I am put in a position where I have to do it, I believe any Chartered Accountant will prove to be a quick learner, effective manager, well versed with pressure handling and sound decision maker. It goes all the way to how CAs are groomed right from the beginning. May be a CA with a degree in Economics would be more suitable person for this job? Because there are many other areas where I don't expect Economists to be that effective (like input in reforms in Taxation laws, corporate laws, investment / project appraisals, internal controls, variances, budgets etc. etc. or maybe I am wrong)?
Anyways my point here is labeling CAs for numbers and money only is not right, our Institute keeps in consideration the changing environment, trends and requirements. And ensures its professionals are trained accordingly so to enable its members to cope with dynamic environment.