What's new

Gujarat LeT encounter was faked, court told.

Windjammer

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
41,290
Reaction score
181
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
The Indian court should be applauded for standing up to and challenging the lies of Indian Sarkar where its engaged in a constant propaganda war against Pakistan and uses the LeT bogyman . granted that LeT is an established terrorist organisation that has brought the two countries to war due to its terrorism but that doesn’t justify faking encounters and getting rid of the suspects without due court procedures. It is nothing new and the Indian writers and film makers have used such fake encounters as a subject matter of their movies where the suspect is told to run and then he is seen falling down in the hails of bullets.

The Question is this the only incident? maybe the courageous judge should take a suo moto action and look into all such high profile encounters where the only casualties of an encounter are the terrorist and none of them survives to tell the tale to the court and what the judges are left is with the police statement and the rhetoric of national security. Whats interesting is that the supposed target of the alleged terrorists was a man who is blamed for the Gujrat massacre and this story seemed to convenient to blame on LeT and buy some public sympathy for Modi.



narendramodi-reut543.jpg



NEW DELHI: India appeared headed for more embarrassment in its anti-terror talks with Pakistan after the Gujarat High Court on Monday admitted a high-level probe report stating that an alleged encounter death of a Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) suspect in 2004 was faked by police.

Acting on the game-changing report by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) about the Ishrat Jehan encounter by police under Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s administration, the Gujarat High Court ordered that murder charges be framed against the offending police officers.

India’s federal Intelligence Bureau too had supported the claim that a Lashkar plot was under way in 2004 to kill Mr Modi and it was concluded at some level to have pointed to Ishrat Jehan and her alleged LeT team.

The SIT submitted its final report in the case saying that Ms Ishrat along with Javed Sheikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed prior to the date of the alleged encounter on June 15, 2004.

However, the state crime branch then claimed that Ms Ishrat along with others were killed in a shootout. The crime branch had claimed that the four were members of the LeT terror group and were on a mission to kill Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

Gujarat government spokesperson Jai Narayan Vyas said: “What are being discussed in media are some pointers that emerged during the debate on this case and certain observations by the High Court. As a state government we believe that court judgments are not meant for commenting upon and we fully respect the process of law and whatever is and shall be the judgment of the court.”

In 2010, an independent judicial inquiry by Justice S. P. Tamang too had concluded that the crime branch was at fault. He had even said that weapons had been planted on the victims.

Indian Muslims have been frequently alleged to be Pakistani terrorists.

They are held and tortured for attacks, for example, the blasts in Malegaon and the Samjhauta Express. But these were later shown to have been the handiwork of Hindu extremists. Mr Modi is seen widely as a Muslim baiter, a strategy that has worked for him in instilling insecurities among the Hindus, many of whom then voted for him in two state elections since the anti-Muslim pogroms of 2002.

Pakistani officials have used the apparent role of Hindu extremists in major blasts to remind India that terrorism is not merely confined to Muslim extremists from Pakistan but was increasingly becoming the preferred method of Hindu extremists to push their political agenda.

Gujarat LeT encounter was faked, court told | Newspaper | DAWN.COM
 
I doubt if the Pakistani administration can use this to consolidate their position or expose the truth about the WOT. Pakistani officials prefer to remain silent or inactive even with numerous evidence in their hands. They start talking when it is too late or it has very little impact. We have seen this in the Davis case and also in many other cases. This implies that the corrupt Pakistani officials and politicians somehow make personal gains by remaining silent or inactive during crucial moments.
 
Don't tweak the headlines to make it sensational

LeT website called Ishrat a martyr: GK Pillai

New Delhi: A day after the Special Investigation Team (SIT) told the Gujarat High Court that the Ishrat Jahan encounter was not genuine, former Home Secretary GK Pillai has defended the Gujarat government's claim that the Intelligence Bureau had given inputs against Ishrat.

Pillai has told CNN-IBN that from the evidence available, it was clear that Ishrat and others were involved in suspicious activities. "Ishrat used to live with another man in different hotels, which definitely was suspicious."

He recalled that the Lashkar-e-Toiba website had called her a martyr and later removed it.

He also said that the SIT report was not a comment on whether Ishrat was a terrorist or not. "The SIT only said that from the evidence available, it was found out that the encounter was fake, but there was no word on whether Ishrat and other were alleged terrorists or not," Pillai said.

In a huge setback to the Narendra Modi government, the SIT, on Monday, told the Gujarat High Court on Monday that the Ishrat Jahan encounter was not genuine. After the SIT filed its report, the High Court ordered that a complaint under Indian Penal Code Section 302 (murder) has to be filed against those involved in the fake encounter.

The SIT, headed by IPS officer RR Verma and including two other seniors police officers Mohan Jha and Satish Verma, said that Ishrat along with Javed Sheikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed prior to the date of encounter on June 15, 2004. All three SIT officers came to an unanimous conclusion that the encounter was fake.

The arguments in the case will continue over the issue of who will file an FIR and investigate the case.

Those accused in the case include then Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime Branch) PP Pande, suspended Deputy Inspector General DG Vanzara, then Assistant Commissioner of Police GL Singhal and Assistant Commissioner of Police NK Amin - all IPS officers. There were total of 21 policemen, including the IPS officers, involved in the fake encounter.

Vanzara and Amin are also accused in the Soharabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case and murder of Sheikh's wife Kausar Bi and are presently behind bars.

A division bench of justices Jayant Patel and Abhilasha Kumari on October 7, had directed the SIT to submit the final report that would conclude if the encounter of the four persons, claimed by Gujarat Police to be terrorists, was genuine or fake.

Ishrat, a 19-year-old college girl, along with Javed Sheikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed by Ahmedabad Crime Branch on June 15, 2004.

The Crime Branch had then claimed the four were members of terror group Lashkar-e-Toiba and were on a mission to kill Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

The probe in the case was supervised directly by the High Court which constituted the SIT in 2010 to investigate the genuineness of the encounter after petitions were filed by Ishrat's mother Shamima Kausar and Gopinath Pillai raising questions about the police version of the incident.

Ishrat case timeline:

June 15, 2004: Gujarat Police claimed that they had killed Ishrat Jahan and three others killed on the outskirts of Ahmedabad. The police claimed the four were members of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba on a mission to kill Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

September 2009: Ahmedabad metropolitan magistrate SP Tamang calls the encounter fake.

August 2010: Gujarat HC asks Supreme Court-appointed SIT headed by former CBI director RK Raghavan (investigating the Gujarat riots) to take up the case.

September 2010: The HC constitutes a new SIT after Raghavan-headed SIT expressed its inability to undertake the probe.

November 2010: The Supreme Court rejects the Gujarat government's plea challenging the HC order to form the new SIT.

December 2010: Three-member SIT begins investigation in the case and starts recording statements of the witnesses, police officials involved.

January 28, 2011: SIT member Satish Varma files affidavit stating that the encounter was a fake one. He also accuses other two members of not allowing the probe to be done in an unbiased manner.

April 8, 2011: Gujarat HC division bench warns the state authorities that the court will hand over the probe to central agencies like CBI or NIA if the state does not allow SIT to probe without hindrance.

LeT website called Ishrat a martyr: GK Pillai - India News - IBNLive
 
I don't care if it was a cold blooded murder or not as long as there are evidence against her
 
This is happening uder indian laws, this is what laws are for, for verifying the truth and providing justice accordingly.

Terrorist staes actively protecting terrorists will not know the difference.

As to changing thread titles, well this gentleman does it all the time and seems to work under a different set of rules. well, their forum.
 
She was making good time with proclaimed gangsters in the car,"gehoon ke saath-saath ghun bhee pista hai"....who cares ????
 
Another slap on the Pakistanis who said muslims were discriminated...they celebrate both times..when the encounter is proven fake..and when the trial is on they ll talk about discrimination against muslims...which side you gotta pick now?:D
 
In Hyderabad, India muslims hold highest number of Luxury cars.

Muslims top many common entrance exams in India.

A muslim makes India a force to reckon with against the world.

A muslim is speaker of highest constitutional Indian body.

Now, keep the pants zipped and sleep tight.
 
Actually boss there are some guys on the forum who are jelous of india & its progress along with hundu - muslim unity, so they keep on priking indian members with these crap articels , Thanks .
 
this comes as no surprise.....just look at the pattern.

it feels like only yesterday, we received that famous "most wanted list" :laugh:

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 PM ----------

Don't tweak the headlines to make it sensational

check the article in the first post of the thread; no headlines were tweaked
 
This is happening uder indian laws, this is what laws are for, for verifying the truth and providing justice accordingly.

Terrorist staes actively protecting terrorists will not know the difference.

As to changing thread titles, well this gentleman does it all the time and seems to work under a different set of rules. well, their forum.

Yea, let's shoot and kill them first......fill up the vote bank....the justice can do it's stuff later.
Kind of like bringing Pigeons to the Cat i would say.!!
 
Indian government do alot of other fake encounters-

Like picking up some innocent Kashmiris from their home and then killing them-
Making it look like the mighty army had killed LeT commander and few more-

As i said before-
All this happened for the mass consumption of Indian general dumb public-
 
Back
Top Bottom