Gripen E For pakistan?

[JohnWick]

No chance for Gripen E because JF -17C is far more superior than Gripen.

What is jf-17"c"

Not desirable for India, but thankfully too expensive for Pakistan.

 

[randomradio]

bear in mind that even if it is too expensive for Pakistan what does it provide better than for example the J-10 which is a much cheaper alternative and in many aspects better than the gripen-e

The Gripen E is much better than the J-10 in many respects, many of which being very important. The only advantage the J-10 has over the Gripen E is greater TWR. Everything else favours the Gripen E. One of the biggest selling points for the Gripen E is the higher endurance on internal fuel. The IAF also rates the Gripen E higher than the F-16 Block 70, so that should tell you everything you need to know.

Wouldn't you want the AESA+Meteor combo yourself?

Of course, there's also the point of not putting all your eggs in the Chinese basket.

 

[ziaulislam]

Blk 3 itself will be on the same league if not of JF17....there is nothing to gain from this sanctions prove fighters...And Sweden itself is a NATO/American dependent country, they dont have an independent Foreign Policy like the rest of Europe. As we all saw in Iran Nuke Deal.

They r afterall an alliance of small countries which r otherwise insignificant on international relations.

And after watching the video it turns out that this @kahonapyarhai kid has shared the video abt Philippines Air Force's alleged interest shown in this fighter not abt Pakistan airforce and he just saw PAF name and then went crazy to share it and score some brownie points without even first looking at the video!

Sweden not in NATO
Engine American
Sweds wont sell
Pakistanis wont buy
Will not take even given free
End of story

 

[randomradio]

You mean IAF doesn't have the confidence to fly single engine jets.

Let me make it clear so even kids can understand:
It's not desirable for India that Pakistan will get access to the Gripen, but thankfully it's too expensive for Pakistan to buy anyway.

 

[BHarwana]

What is jf-17"c"

Block 3

 

[JohnWick]

Who told you that?

Block 3

..

Let me make it clear so even kids can understand:
It's not desirable for India that Pakistan will get access to the Gripen, but thankfully it's too expensive for Pakistan to buy anyway.

Well v r developing our jft into Gripen E standards.

 

[randomradio]

Well v r developing our jft into Gripen E standards.

Go right ahead. All power to you if you don't buy Western aircraft anymore.

 

[JohnWick]

Go right ahead. All power to you if you don't buy Western aircraft anymore.

Well what abput your rafales is the corrupt deal still on the board?

""""Well we want to develop our own platform into westren standards. We'll achieve in the block 4 or 5 of jft

 

[randomradio]

Well what abput your rafales is the corrupt deal still on the board?

Don't worry about Rafales. We will operate hundreds of 'em.

""""Well we want to develop our own platform into westren standards. We'll achieve in the block 4 or 5 of jft

Sure. All power to you. Good luck.

 

[Akasa]

The Gripen E is much better than the J-10 in many respects, many of which being very important.Everything else favours the Gripen E. One of the biggest selling points for the Gripen E is the higher endurance on internal fuel.

Explain in technical detail which parts of the Gripen E is "better" than the J-10 (which variant of the latter are you talking about).

I can just as easily claim that the JF-17 Blk III is "much better than the Rafale in many respects" if evidence wasn't required to corroborate that statement.

 

[randomradio]

Explain in technical detail which parts of the Gripen E is "better" than the J-10 (which variant of the latter are you talking about).

I can just as easily claim that the JF-17 Blk III is "much better than the Rafale in many respects" if evidence wasn't required to corroborate that statement.

The maintenance and logistics are better. The base technology is better, the quality of the aircraft, avionics and engine with very good MBTF and MBTO values.

The aircraft's weapons layout is better than the J-10's.

The Gripen carries more fuel than the J-10 while with lesser thrust. The J-10 requires two fuel tanks to match the Gripen's range on internal fuel only.

Naturally the avionics are superior, as are the weapons, while also being equipped with a large array of weapons options.

So I thought my previous post was already well-understood. The only thing better on the J-10 is the higher TWR, everything else belongs to Gripen. Of course, there's no guarantee that gives the J-10 any real advantage either, since the Gripen has good enough TWR and can also supercruise to a certain extent. So even J-10's TWR advantage is suspect considering even the latest versions still operate the old AL-31F.

 

[ziaulislam]

The maintenance and logistics are better. The base technology is better, the quality of the aircraft, avionics and engine with very good MBTF and MBTO values.

The aircraft's weapons layout is better than the J-10's.

The Gripen carries more fuel than the J-10 while with lesser thrust. The J-10 requires two fuel tanks to match the Gripen's range on internal fuel only.

Naturally the avionics are superior, as are the weapons, while also being equipped with a large array of weapons options.

So I thought my previous post was already well-understood. The only thing better on the J-10 is the higher TWR, everything else belongs to Gripen. Of course, there's no guarantee that gives the J-10 any real advantage either, since the Gripen has good enough TWR and can also supercruise to a certain extent. So even J-10's TWR advantage is suspect considering even the latest versions still operate the old AL-31F.

j10 has better range fuel and payload

See what gripen advertising does is that they out small star and fail to explain it

For example the payload...payload is max payload with minimum fuel required for takeoff(half tank!). You can google it it will come up in small text from official sources

Avionics etc is subjetive thing for now we really dont know..i think the only country that can say anything is onw who is operating both Chinese and American weapons(b50/52) like Pakistan

Engine i agree russian engines are cheaper but low life..as the whole thought process is production

 

[aliyusuf]

Gripen-E is better if it is compared with J-10A.

The comparison becomes unclear when we consider J-10B or the upcoming J-10C variants.

@randomradio maybe you should give the comparison figures b/w Gripen-E vs J-10B and Gripen-E vs J-10C.

The image you posted above is that of J-10A. J-10 later variants have an uprated Al-31FN3 and the new & better WS-10 engines. Recently they even introduced a TVC version WS-10 on J-10B.

Do us a favor, in your comparisons, also state the thrust of the fighters' respective engines/power-plant, types of radar, clean head-on RCS of each fighter, advantages and disadvantages b/w meteor and pl-15, EW suite … etc.

Because no comparison without the above will be fair, but just ones own wishes.

 

[Basel]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1067060828183003136

Sweden will not sell it to Pakistan, and now it will not add much over JFT block-3 until later is not made on par with Gripen.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Sweden not in NATO
Engine American
Sweds wont sell
Pakistanis wont buy
Will not take even given free
End of story

main b to almost yahe kah raha hun lala g!