gogbot
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 2,201
- Reaction score
- 0
If India can ink this deal without TOT, why couldn't this also apply to other deal.
I agree with you. Indians inherently just don't like America and Americans. We can clear see from the tone of the article that Indians media do not likely US at all. I guess dispise the fact that America military sell doesn't come with the TOT. Indians have not get the fact that in order to have the best, there is no TOT. As a result, many Indians rather buy inferior products with TOT. The problem is that Indian do jack squat with the technology anyway. A complete waste of money to buy TOT
3. Can you prove that India do something with its TOT. China without TOT can reverse engineer. India never develop anything out of TOT. A total waste of money
WEll, it mean that India has the technology to build the plane as it is. Pretty much, Russia suppliers and Indians supplier provide the parts and let the plane assemble in India. But India does not develop upon the transfered technology because it lack the domestic ability to absorb the technology.
I'm just saying what I see. Just because I believe India is wasting money (It could purchase superior US weaponry and save the TOT money for its poor) that doesn't mean that I'm biased. I just have a different view of how India should spend money.
Your attack on me instead of my message just show how truth bites. Please focus on the message and if you disagree, show some class instead of making senseless name calling.
if India absorbs the tech,we will see some change:use the tech to improve the weapons which India holds now(MIG21,lca and so on),but we haven't see these now
India is getting junk from Russians. If I am the Indian leader, I would side with the US and get in line for F-35. Russians need money so they are willing to sell their top of line aircraft with TOT to India. If India choose to buy from Russians over the US aircraft, fine. But if its buying it because of TOT, then that is not a good decision as TOT still mean that India must acquire part of the compoenents from foregin sources. Unless, of course, India also get TOT for all the components, such as the western European radar. Than that may be a different story. Otherwise, a partial TOT is a waste of money.
Once a technology is transfre to India, I believe India can produce the product domestically.
I do believe that India does produce some of the best and brightest engineers out there. But I do not believe that India implement the policy to best utilize its talent. Its engineering brain power is being held back by the beauracracy. As a result, India is not reaching its potential.
I totally agree. India still cannot absort the technology. It definitely can manufacture components after the technology transfer. But its not able to develop upon technology transfer. In this regard, I believe that Iran and maybe Pakistan is even ahead of India.
Rubbish just rubbish.
You have taken all the info out of context and time line.
ToT in India is very new. It only started about 10 years ago with the Purchase of the MKI aircraft. There was to ToT before the MKI as far i understand.
And the MKI is huge improvement over the standard Su-30
How many ToT agreements have we even signed. Only a handful.
And whats the time line fore ToT agreements in India. Very recently.
The Indian defense establishment is till very new and developing , development takes time and expertise.
That's why there is ToT to build up that expertise.
But That ToT has been used already.
If the LCA has a MMR radar its due to ToT with Israeli.
We have our own fully India version of the Brhamos Missile.
That's due to ToT
Building up India's defense establishment is consequence of all these investments, being made to make the forces self reliant.
your immature statements about India not being to understand technology. Only shows your Bias towards India.
You seem to think Only the privileged few have the god given gift of technology and the rest of us should just buy and not ask questions.