Surenas
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 6,740
- Reaction score
- -6
Stephen Hawkings and Richard Dawkings would be pissed off today
Not at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stephen Hawkings and Richard Dawkings would be pissed off today
world is searching for "god particle" and here in india we have several self proclaimed "living gods" (asaram, sri sri, ramdev, kripalu maharaj, nirmal baba, nithyanand, lal kitaab amrit........... (the list is long).
Actually Stephen Hawking conceded that he lost that famous bet!
Density in what sense, in trillions of collision only few hundreds have been found(proposed)...about rest dnoEven i thought Higgs Boson will always remain in theory only, cannot be proven or validated by experimentation. Still i'm reluctant to accept it as long as i'm not reading the detailed analysis.
I mean how amusing is this, they're proving the existence of a particle which gives mass to another particle.
Does that mean Boson Particle has immensely high density? (this question might sound pretty noob)
Density in what sense, in trillions of collision only few hundreds have been found(proposed)...about rest dno
A neutron star of of 1.4 solar masses and a radius of 15km would have a mean density of about 2*1017 kg/m3. A teaspoonful (5mL) of material at that density would weigh in at about 109 tons.
The 1st one wins..of course..becuz the second one doesn't exist!God particle vs God
dont know who wins
Higgs boson gives mass to these particles, i don't know what gives mass to this boson... When you consider these things (like neutrons, protons etc) other forces become predominant than gravitational force, like weak nuclear forces. That's why we transfer to another frame and this analogy is just to understand how strong these forces are.In one article, i remember. A tea spoon full of neutrons will weigh several thousand tonnes, these are hypothetical questions. Isolating neutrons is not possible, just consider a hypothetical scenario...
That's what i meant.
The 1st one wins..of course..becuz the second one doesn't exist!
Higgs boson gives mass to these particles, i don't know what gives mass to this boson... When you consider these things (like neutrons, protons etc) other forces become predominant than gravitational force, like weak nuclear forces. That's why we transfer to another frame and this analogy is just to understand how strong these forces are.
The release on Wednesday of dramatic new data pointing to the existence of the Higgs boson "God particle" sent a special flutter of pride, mixed with frustration, through India's scientific community.
The "Higgs" of Higgs boson is well known to refer to Peter Higgs, the Britishresearcher who in 1964 laid much of the conceptual groundwork for the presence of the elusive particle.
What is largely unknown, at least to non-specialists, is that the term "boson" owes its name to the pioneering work of the late Indian physicist, Satyendra Nath Bose.
Born during British colonial rule in 1894 in Calcutta (now Kolkata), Bose was a lecturer at both the universities of Calcutta and Dhaka.
In 1924, he sent a paper to Albert Einstein describing a statistical model that eventually led to the discovery of what became known as the Bose-Einstein condensate phenomenon.
The paper laid the basis for describing the two fundamental classes of sub-atomic particles -- bosons, named after Bose, and fermions, after the Italian physicist Enrico Fermi.
While several Nobel prizes have been awarded research related to the concepts of the boson, Bose himself was never honoured by the Nobel academy.
Archan Majumdar, an astrophysicist at the eponymous Satyendra Nath Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences in Kolkata, said Bose's name would be better known if his discoveries hadn't been made during the colonial era.
"If India had been an independent nation he could have got more recognition than he has," Majumdar said.
"Also, if he had the Nobel prize which he deserved more than many others he would have been more known, but unfortunately it didn't happen."
In 1954 Bose awarded the Padma Vibhushan -- India's second highest civilian honour. He died in 1974
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...-particle-much-boson-higgs.html#ixzz1zf8yt3C9
When their theories are found correct by experimentation. The theorist and experimenter gets the prize. Noble prize is not given posthumously.Seriously, what BS is that!? Bose was a theoretical physicist. Since when did theoretical physicists get Nobel Prizes just for their theories? Had Bose been alive today when the Higgs-Boson has almost been discovered, then probably he might have shared any Nobel Prize that may have been awarded to the effort. But I still would highly doubt that. Theoretical physicists dont get Nobel prizes. Case in point - Stephen Hawking.
Because observable universe seems to be in a constant expansion, it is easy to preposition that the farther back in time you will go the denser universe will be until the point of immense density, so it presumed that outburst of all the matter wasn't a sloth crawl in a park but more like an explosion, oh and the evidence? well how about cosmic background radiation?
Cosmic microwave background radiation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ironically most of them are from Kolkata, we bongs are genius.
Seriously, what BS is that!? Bose was a theoretical physicist. Since when did theoretical physicists get Nobel Prizes just for their theories? Had Bose been alive today when the Higgs-Boson has almost been discovered, then probably he might have shared any Nobel Prize that may have been awarded to the effort. But I still would highly doubt that. Theoretical physicists dont get Nobel prizes. Case in point - Stephen Hawking.
So when did Rabindranath Tagore or C V Raman get their Nobel Prizes? After independence?
Indeed , but please just stay away from Economics and finance. No offence