What's new

Global times editor accepts multiple deaths of Chinese soldiers

Status
Not open for further replies.
And jeopardize all those Indian soldiers in custody with China? Come on, Indian Army is not that stupid.
Dude, had it been the case, it would be more humilating for the Chinese and a scoop for India.
Are you trying to imply that after admitting to deaths of 20 Soldiers and 10 captives, India kept Chinese prisoners under cover. !!!
 
. .
Dude, had it been the case, it would be more humilating for the Chinese and a scoop for India.
Are you trying to imply that after admitting to deaths of 20 Soldiers and 10 captives, India kept Chinese prisoners under cover. !!!
What’s more important, to recover those in captivity or to humiliate Chinese? Chinese are not going to give a damn about any humiliation anyways.
 
.
Don't know about that. Better consult with Korean War Veterans.

Why did the PLA claim the allies were demoralized even back then?
I am surprised there are any Chinese veterans from that war I hear most were killed in Korea.
PLA publicly acknowledges 180,000 deaths independent estimates are four times higher.
 
.
From this it is clear that, the recent PLA soldier tumbstone floated on internet and PDF is genuine.
 
. . .
Yeah sure!
A feature given on the PIB web site on "Operation Vijay" clearly says that 527 brave soldiers and airmen laid down their lives during the Kargil war.
You don't read your own links. LOL!

Also why not ?
.

The RTI application filed by activist Raman Sharma also found that in the past two years and seven months, 8,571 ceasefire violations have taken place with the casualty figures being 119 dead (including 56 security personnel) and 608 injured, 300 of them security personnel.
 
Last edited:
.
Yeah sure!

"War related casualties cannot be placed in public domain without a reasonable distance of time as they affect the morale of the nation in general and that of the troops in particular. Disclosure of such information has a bearing on the national security,"

Yes they just issued this order for no reason then :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Use your brain, the person clearly asked this organisation because they wanted more accurate figures, but it seems that this was apparently too much to ask for. I bet things have definitely become more difficult since then.

Yeah sure!

You don't read your own links. LOL!

Also why not ?
.


If you legitimately think that in 2,952 "ceasefire violations" only 8 troops have died, then you are a gullible fool.
 
.
Use your brain, the person clearly asked this organisation because they wanted more accurate figures, but it seems that this was apparently too much to ask for. I bet things have definitely become more difficult since then.
PIB gave as accurate as it gets. Its the mouth piece of the government. If it is lying you are not going to get any truth from other parts as well.

BTW, while we are setting standards for "openess" of Indian army, how about Chinese and Pakistani Army who flatly refuse ANY information on this matter? Remember it is not denying any private journalist but senate.


“Will the order of parliament prevail or that of the Ministry of Defence or GHQ?” he asked.

This one takes the cake.
 
.
. .
From this it is clear that, the recent PLA soldier tumbstone floated on internet and PDF is genuine.
No it was not ... pass it through any PS detector and you will find the lettering is completely superimposed.
Why did the PLA claim the allies were demoralized even back then?
I am surprised there are any Chinese veterans from that war I hear most were killed in Korea.
PLA publicly acknowledges 180,000 deaths independent estimates are four times higher.
200k Chinese dead, per the Chinese defense industry, sounds about right. The UN estimates for the Chinese dead were just extrapolations ... in the actual battlegrounds, they only found a fraction of the dead Chinese bodies they had claimed to killed. But basically the Korean War Chinese death count stands at 200k (Chinese sources) to 400k dead (Western estimates).
 
.
New Delhi, Sep 14: An American newspaper has claimed that over 60 Chinese soldiers were killed in the Galwan Valley clash with India.

News Week said in an article that in the June 15 clash 60 soldiers of the Chinese PLA had been killed. This comes weeks after another report said that 30 soldiers were killed in the clash, while attributing the same to US intelligence reports.

8b8f8d22c37db1909a9e4dd53129edbb

The report also says that the failure of the PLA on the Indian border would have far reaching effects. The Chinese military had initially told the Chinese president, Xi Jinping that the focus should be on driving out opponents and recruiting loyalists.

Chinese PLA wanted a repeat of Galwan Valley: Shots fired at LAC first time in 45 years

The article says that the number of Chinese killed could exceed 60, but Beijing will not admit to the extent of the debacle.

On Friday, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh chaired a two hour long meeting with the NSA and the military brass. Chief of Defence Staff later appeared before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on defence. However the China issue was not discussed. The CDS agreed to a request by NCP leader, Sharad Pawar who sought to know the details of the border row and said that a letter would be submitted to the committee.

These developments took place after External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar met with his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi at Moscow. During the meeting both sides agreed that the troops should maintain proper distance and also ease tensions.

The foreign ministers of India and China underlined the importance of disengagement at the Line of Actual Control as the first step towards deescalation of tensions.

The military commanders of India and China will meet in the next couple of days to discuss disengagement from friction points along the LAC. While no date has been fixed as yet, sources say that there are some issues under discussion before the military commanders could meet.

Officials say that the military commanders would work out the process to disengage. China's Foreign Minister, Wang Yi and his Indian counterpart S Jaishankar agreed that the de-escalation should follow comprehensive disengagement.

India told China that the massing of Chinese troops along the Line of Actual Control is a cause of grave concern. Beijing was told that the provocative behaviour by the Chinese along the LAC showed complete disregard for bilateral agreements and protocols. When Yi said that the bi-lateral ties should continue on a parallel track, Jaishankar reminded him about the immense build up of Chinese troops. China has deployed 50,000 men, tanks, missiles and 150 aircraft.

While Yi spoke about thinning of troops, he had no clear answer about the massive troop build up. Jaishankar however added that while India is all in favour of bi-lateral ties, this could work well only if the borders were peaceful.



 
.
Why Modi needs articles to calm India and claim big? Contrary to Indian Media Stunts; I don't find PLA taking any help of articles or trying to pose big at all instead, end results are discussed and everyone talks about. Sorry to say but if by next, India lost bigger number of troops as compare to 3800sqm land; we might see them Modi discussing that India lost more land and will never talk about the human losses.

Can anyone get the drift? talk about something that India didn't lost in greater numbers as compare to land liberated by China and that is the only goal which can be achieved by articles and that's it.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom