Given a chance, Kashmiris would like to break away: CIA

[Marathaman]

Actually yeah....I forgot that a hypothetically Pakistani Sania would be facing death threats right now.

 

[haviZsultan]

Now you want Sania too?! Forget it. You get neither Kashmir nor Sania. We have no idea of sending her to hell.

Thank God. Sania is not a Pakistani. If she were a Pakistani, she would have been beheaded or bombed for wearing a short skirt while playing tennis. Wow! Pakistan is a safe haven for muslims.

Please grow up! We have so much prostitution in Lahore! There are call-girls calling you every few weeks! Are these prostitutes beheaded or bombed? Even the mullahs go out with them to play football! Then the mullahs come out the next day refreshed and restored chanting anti-Musharraf slogans and anti american slogans as they get out after having a football match...

We have Pakistani movies that run here in which we hear so much swearing and sometimes ummm Al-jans... now would that be possible if the mullahs had so much power? True they make a lot of noise but can they do anything about it? No. So please don't make up stuff and try to be an Anti-Pakistani Bhagat Singh...

If Sania would be in Pakistan and chose to wear a mini-skirt when playing tennis no one could stop her from doing so!

Hrrrr... we won't send her to Pakistan... you remind me of the mutants in resident evil extinction. Do you have a contagious disease or something?

 

[Always Neutral]

Then how come you do not have a Pakistani Girl who is as good as Sania Mirza ?

 

[haviZsultan]

Then how come you do not have a Pakistani Girl who is as good as Sania Mirza ?

Well you were about to import the Pathan family to Pakistan... now why don't you do it with Sania Mirza?

Well we have Aisum al Haq and Aqeel Khan who are good! Actually what is this a sports discussion or what?

 

[Always Neutral]

No but your Mohmmad Akbar story of how muslims are treated cannot be confirmed but the success story of the poor boys like Irfan Pathan from Gujarat, Sania Mirza and Mr Premji can easliy be verified.

 

[A.Rahman]

back to the topic guys.

 

[ejaz007]

Gentlemen,
My Indian friends are completely wrong. Kashmir historically has never been a part of India. It was ruled by different rulers and was not under Indian control. The last ruler in 1947 was Maharaja Hari Singh. As per partition rules Muslim majority areas were to become part of Pakistan and Hindu majority areas India. Kashmir was Muslim majority area. However due to conspiracy between Mount baton, Nehru and Hari Singh India landed its forces in Kashmir. The fact is that India did not even had a proper land route to Kashmir. To enable them to have access to Kashmir Ferozpur and Gurdaspur districts also Muslim Majority areas were handed over to India by Red Cliff Commission in 1947. This enabled India to have access to Kashmir. In contrast Pakistan had clear land route to Kashmir through Sialkot, Abbotabad and Murree. In response to Indian invasion People from adjoining parts of Pakistan and Kashmir itself launched armed resistance movement later supported by Pakistan’s paramilitary forces. When India failed to quell this struggle they went to UN and promised to settle the issue according to the wishes of the people of Kashmir. Mr. Nehru himself in speeches said that India does not want forced marriages and those not willing to be part of India should choose their own way. The only stand India has in its case is that Maharaja itself requested Indian forces and had agreed to be part of India. Even if this is true which I highly doubt since the document has never surfaced or at least I have never seen it, the decision was to be made by the people of Kashmir and not the maharaja.
After sixty years of Indian brutalities well-documented throughput the world it does not seem possible that given a chance the people of Kashmir will wish to remain part of India. India was once partitioned so it is not impossible that it will not be partitioned again. Hindu leadership in 1947 was also saying that it is not possible to partition India as it is a sacred cow and they are still saying this.
Gentlemen the purpose of my writing is not to hurt Indians but rather to keep the history and facts correct. History should not be distorted just to please oneself.

 

[Bull]

Gentlemen,
My Indian friends are completely wrong. Kashmir historically has never been a part of India. It was ruled by different rulers and was not under Indian control. The last ruler in 1947 was Maharaja Hari Singh. As per partition rules Muslim majority areas were to become part of Pakistan and Hindu majority areas India. Kashmir was Muslim majority area. However due to conspiracy between Mount baton, Nehru and Hari Singh India landed its forces in Kashmir. The fact is that India did not even had a proper land route to Kashmir. To enable them to have access to Kashmir Ferozpur and Gurdaspur districts also Muslim Majority areas were handed over to India by Red Cliff Commission in 1947. This enabled India to have access to Kashmir. In contrast Pakistan had clear land route to Kashmir through Sialkot, Abbotabad and Murree. In response to Indian invasion People from adjoining parts of Pakistan and Kashmir itself launched armed resistance movement later supported by Pakistan’s paramilitary forces. When India failed to quell this struggle they went to UN and promised to settle the issue according to the wishes of the people of Kashmir. Mr. Nehru himself in speeches said that India does not want forced marriages and those not willing to be part of India should choose their own way. The only stand India has in its case is that Maharaja itself requested Indian forces and had agreed to be part of India. Even if this is true which I highly doubt since the document has never surfaced or at least I have never seen it, the decision was to be made by the people of Kashmir and not the maharaja.
After sixty years of Indian brutalities well-documented throughput the world it does not seem possible that given a chance the people of Kashmir will wish to remain part of India. India was once partitioned so it is not impossible that it will not be partitioned again. Hindu leadership in 1947 was also saying that it is not possible to partition India as it is a sacred cow and they are still saying this.
Gentlemen the purpose of my writing is not to hurt Indians but rather to keep the history and facts correct. History should not be distorted just to please oneself.

Oh yeah. Listen up everybody.

 

[Shivakumar]

They are telling what they are taught in their schools. Everybody know about the Pakistan's history textbooks.

 

[haviZsultan]

They are telling what they are taught in their schools. Everybody know about the Pakistan's history textbooks.

Are they now?

Well what are they saying about Kashmir in India exept it is a part of India despite the population of Kashmir wanting freedom... so you would say the treatment of Kashmiris in India is very good and the Kashmiris aren't suppressed?

Indeed! History and facts should not be distorted for ones personal satisfaction!

 

[A.Rahman]

They are telling what they are taught in their schools. Everybody know about the Pakistan's history textbooks.

Last time I heard was that Indian soldiers were bribing kashmiris to put Indian flags on their cars on Aug15.

while a day back, they were forcing people to take down Pakistani flags.

I guess this illusion gives them a sense of false hope that; kashmiris would love them after they rape & kill their population

 

[Bull]

Last time I heard was that Indian soldiers were bribing kashmiris to put Indian flags on their cars on Aug15.

while a day back, they were forcing people to take down Pakistani flags.

I guess this illusion gives them a sense of false hope that; kashmiris would love them after they rape & kill their population

Keep your ears open, you will hear a lot more similar stuff.