What's new

Gilgit-Baltistan Constitutional Status and Updates

bananarepublic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,424
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

Supreme Court's powers extended to G-B
SHARE TWEET
Supreme Court's powers extended to G-B
By Hasnaat Malik
Published: January 17, 2019
0SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1890419-gilgitbaltistan-1547719150-1000-640x480.jpg

PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday extended its powers to Gilgit-Baltistan in a written order regarding the area’s constitutional status in Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar’s last case.

The order states that changes to the constitutional status of Gilgit-Baltistan will be determined through a referendum which will be held within 14 days. It further read that until then, people living in the area and in Kashmir will be given fundamental human rights.

A seven-judge bench headed by Justice Nisar issued the order after hearing petitions challenging the vires of the Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self-Governance Order, 2009.

A conundrum called Gilgit-Baltistan

“The Gilgit-Baltistan Courts do not, and will not, sit as courts having the power of judicial review in respect of the territory of Pakistan… nor can they initiate judicial review of departments working outside of Gilgit-Baltistan. Instead, the proposed order (or any previous or subsequent such order) can be challenged by, inter alia, the people of Gilgit-Baltistan, but only before this court…”

While Gilgit-Baltistan courts do not hold constitutional rights within Pakistan, people from the region will be able to challenge the appellant court’s decisions in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
 

Gilgit Baltistan All Parties Press Conference at Islamabad 20 Jan 2019
 


protest against supreme court decision



kute ki toheen hai ..........

A Mind-Boggling Decision by the Supreme Court of Pakistan By : Izhar Hunzai
January 20, 2019




A Mind-Boggling Decision by the Supreme Court of Pakistan
By : Izhar Hunzai


The recent decision of the Supreme Court on the constitutional status of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) came as another disappointment for the people of GB. Rather than addressing key issues, the decision magnifies GB’s longstanding political, legal and economic marginalization vis-à-vis Pakistan. Specifically, it fails to address the persisting effect that GB’s ambiguous status has on the region’s ability to participate in and benefit from meaningful self-governance and development opportunities. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a case in point. Despite being touted as the gateway to CPEC, not a single CPEC dollar is invested in GB, because China does not want to annoy India by investing in a disputed region. The decision does nothing to mitigate the acute sense of unfairness felt by GB residents that despite liberating a large and strategic area and making it part of Pakistan, their interests are continued to be sub-ordinated and held hostage to the Kashmir dispute.
GB’s persisting exclusion from Pakistan’s policy-making forums, such as National Parliament, Senate, Council of Common Interests, and other forums has been widely contested by the region’s residents. It is clear that without this leverage there can be no way to influence national laws and policies that are the essence of democracy and affect the lives of people in GB. The people of GB have tried to disassociate their fate from the fate of Kashmir, arguing that they have no cultural, ethnic, or linguistic relationship with the Kashmir people, and that therefore the final status of the GB should be resolved separately from the solution of Kashmir. The areas comprising current GB, were ruled for millennia as independent feudal and republican states and are unique in their forms of governance and management of natural resources. Between the 7th century and early 19th century, areas of GB were ruled by a succession of various dynasties including the Trakhans of Gilgit, the Maghlots of Nagar, the Ayashos of Hunza, the Burushai of Punyal, the Maqpoons of Skardu, the Anchans of Shigar and the Yabgos of Khaplu. The modern colonial period began in 1846 when the East India Company sold “all the hilly territories east of Indus”, including areas that are a part of current GB, to Maharaja Gulab Sing of Kashmir under the Treaty of Amritsar. Except for a period of occupation by the British and their Kashmiri allies, outsiders never ruled these states. Pakistan inherited the region of GB through a voluntary accession by the people of GB. It did not inherit this area from the British or the Kashmiris.
It is just mind boggling that the Supreme Court goes to extraordinary lengths to defend the right of self-determination of the people of Kashmir, but cringes from according the same right to the people of GB. What is most disheartening is that the Honorable Court in its decision seems to condone and accept the criminal acts of colonial powers selling GB and its people to third parties without the knowledge of the people concerned, as the legal basis for accepting GB as part of the erstwhile state of J&K, while conveniently ignoring the legitimate Revolution and Liberation of GB on November 2, 1947. In the eyes of people in GB this in itself constitutes a bigger violation of the fundamental human rights that the Supreme Court purports to protect and uphold, by extending its own jurisdiction to GB.
GB’s uncertain status not only prevents the region’s inhabitants from participating as full democratic citizens, but also discourages investments by bilateral (China) and multilateral agencies, such the World Bank, Asian Development, and Islamic Development Bank (which have declined to finance the Diamer-Basha Dam and Bunji Hydropower Project). Without access to highest policy forums, GB citizens have limited avenues to voice their opinions, promote and protect their interests, and demand governmental accountability. GB’s economic opportunities, including developing natural resource industries (like mining and renewable energy) and CPEC and tourism, are also curtailed by such liminal status. The continued failure of the Pakistani state to respond positively to the political demands of the people of the GB has spawned an atmosphere of disenchantment and disdain, which this judgement has confirmed. What is more, the Court seems to support the recommendations made by the Sartaj Aziz Committee, which would have given a special ‘provisional’ provincial status to GB, until a final settlement could be found for the Kashmir dispute. First proposed in the PTI Manifesto for the GBLA elections of 2015, this is the preferred solution for all political parties in GB, and there is also a Resolution passed by the Gilgit-Baltistan Legislative Assembly (GBLA), supporting this option. It is surprising that this being the most workable solution of meeting the legitimate demands of the people of GB and also protecting Pakistan’s stance on Kashmir, the Honorable Court stopped short of supporting it in its decision.
The only silver lining one can see in this decision is that the Honorable Supreme Court says that the State of Pakistan has all the de jure and de facto powers to decide the fate of GB. Now, the ball is again in the court of the Federal Government.

https://gbcef.blogspot.com/2019/01/...QMbQ9A5uP9NP495P44E-fw0Usg5h5R5VKRJDY8liE8hWY
 
Gb is part of Kashmir. The bit pak 'gave' to china is part of Kashmir aswell.
 
Pakistan to merge GB like all other states of ur country...In that scenario they can get benifit of their voice being heard in your parliament...

This internal autonomy is a non starter...Why some states will be given autonomy where as others are not getting it??
 
Back
Top Bottom