Man, you are bored. I was here interacting with people I like interacting with, having decided to not enjoy the shock and awe of intellect here. And you tagged me here.
What interested you?
Let us examine the contentions:
Kashmir and Runn of Kutch region are pretty much secure from any CSD based invasion. In Punjab plains, Pakistan has capability to deal, repel and even answer any CSD based invasion. Only vulnerable spot, i.e the Thar Desert region is 'protected' by deterrence cast by Pakistan's development of NASR Tactical Nuclear Weapon utilizing doctrinal posture of Full Spectrum Minimum Deterrence.
If you notice in the first line itself, you can see how flawed the premise here is, and what level of understanding of the Doctrine is available. The OP clearly assumes something.
As for the last sentence, you will find the interesting premise of Nasr as always and that too already mated with warheads
Need I even go on?
Yes and certainly no. The aim is to allow flexibility to the political class before the International Pressure kicks in. So I would not agree with this contention.
And Certainly No comes with the fact that the Cold Start is based on Pivot Corps initiating and achieving breakthroughs at certain points (while multiple points will be struck, it is assumed that only few will succeed in a breach), while the strike corps elements will exploit the same for deeper thrust beyond a node.
There is no Holding Corps concept anymore. And there is no if war escalates.
I would suggest going back to the dedicated thread. The OP has been there.
@randomradio
This was interesting ...
I am yet to know this
Was this why you tagged me here?