What's new

Generals Duffer Kyon Hein? | On The Psychology of Military Incompetence | Adil Raja Exclusive

. .
Gone full retard!!!

Duffer Generals Ka Naya Plan | Taarein Kaat Do | Plans to Degrade Internet-Social Media​























Elon Musk's company Starlink Internet Services has officially registered itself with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) to provide internet services in Pakistan through satellite.


According to a statement issued by the Ministry of IT and Telecommunication on Monday, SpaceX Director for Global Licensing and Market Activation Ryan Goodnight met Pakistan's Federal Minister for Information Technology and Telecommunication Syed Aminul Haq to discuss the registration of SpaceX's Starlink.

The meeting was held to explore how Starlink's quickest and least expensive satellite internet services could open the door for reasonably priced broadband services throughout Pakistan.

The minister expressed the optimism that even in remote areas Starlink's services could significantly lower the operational costs of telecom operators.

 
. .
.,.,
FteQhIrXoAI6651
 
.
take it for its worth, but he has been more right than wrong.
 
.
Pakistan was made by a Lawyer and not by Fauj, on the contrary Fauj was the reason for the break up of the country.

پاکستان فوجی نے نہیں وکیل نے بنایا تھا ! آئین کے دفاع کے لئے دما دم مست قلندر ہوگا​



Another example of revisionist history to suit your narrative.

No country is founded by the military. The country is what leads to the establishment of the military. So not sure what your point above is because regardless of what the wakeel sahib says, nobody in khaki has ever claimed to have founded Pakistan.

Second, fauj was not the reason for the breakup. The civilian infighting across East and West Pakistan (Mujeeb and Bhutto) resulted in a military solution being applied to what was a political problem. So let's not rush to assign blame selectively just because it suits your narrative now.

I completely agree the constitution must be protected and the legal community needs to play its part in it.
 
.
Second, fauj was not the reason for the breakup. The civilian infighting across East and West Pakistan (Mujeeb and Bhutto) resulted in a military solution being applied to what was a political problem. So let's not rush to assign blame selectively just because it suits your narrative now.
In case the country breaks again you will conveniently conclude it was an infighting between Khan & Sharif and military had no role to play?

If Awami league had won the elections, the military was not suppose to follow the orders of People's Party. The hegemony of the West Pakistani ruling elite over Pakistan suited the military so it went along, ignoring the decision of the majority.

The same is happening now while expecting different results which is nothing more than insanity.
 
.
Another example of revisionist history to suit your narrative.

No country is founded by the military. The country is what leads to the establishment of the military. So not sure what your point above is because regardless of what the wakeel sahib says, nobody in khaki has ever claimed to have founded Pakistan.

Second, fauj was not the reason for the breakup. The civilian infighting across East and West Pakistan (Mujeeb and Bhutto) resulted in a military solution being applied to what was a political problem. So let's not rush to assign blame selectively just because it suits your narrative now.

I completely agree the constitution must be protected and the legal community needs to play its part in it.
 
.
In case the country breaks again you will conveniently conclude it was an infighting between Khan & Sharif and military had no role to play?

If Awami league had won the elections, the military was not suppose to follow the orders of People's Party. The hegemony of the West Pakistani ruling elite over Pakistan suited the military so it went along, ignoring the decision of the majority.

The same is happening now while expecting different results which is nothing more than insanity.
Yes, easier said than done. Your entire West Pakistan was against giving Mujeeb the mandate so let's not talk about "decision of the majority". There were regular delegations of politicians, businessmen, industrialists going to Yahya and saying "please save Pakistan by not letting the East Pakistani rule". The newspapers of the day were loaded with Op-eds calling for West to assert itself. Point being, there was intense pressure on Yahya from Bhutto and then all of these others (whose interests were at stake if Mujeeb were to rule).

We should keep historical context in mind.
 
.
Another example of revisionist history to suit your narrative.

No country is founded by the military. The country is what leads to the establishment of the military. So not sure what your point above is because regardless of what the wakeel sahib says, nobody in khaki has ever claimed to have founded Pakistan.

Second, fauj was not the reason for the breakup. The civilian infighting across East and West Pakistan (Mujeeb and Bhutto) resulted in a military solution being applied to what was a political problem. So let's not rush to assign blame selectively just because it suits your narrative now.

I completely agree the constitution must be protected and the legal community needs to play its part in it.

as to your first point actions speak louder than words, if you instill such a fear that people cant even name you, and call you khalai makhlooqm, namaloom, muqtadar halqay anytime your unwanted involvement is suspected, you may not be verbally claiming but your actions claim that you are "yeh mulk hamara hai tum bloody civilians ho khaw makhaw is mein"

To your second point, as cmla it was yahya khans job to call the assembly to session, for all the kicking and screaming of bhutto. just like now, let the elections happen. provide security, do your job. if supposedly as claimed that fauj intervenes because politicians cant settle differences then that would have not been an intervention but a discharge of the duty as president/cmla.
 
.
Ahh yes, the divisional HQs, the Log HQs, the military training and academic institutions, the Corps HQs, the DTEs and Branches of GHQ are falling apart, its mutiny everywhere.

The Military command has totally collapsed, GHQ has fallen to pieces and disintegrated- really "Generals Duffer Kiyon hain" :laugh:

In reality, nothing happened, every command and HQ is intact :pakistan:

Gone full retard!!!

Duffer Generals Ka Naya Plan | Taarein Kaat Do | Plans to Degrade Internet-Social Media​

May I name the Signals Comms/IT Department which doesn't need to cut wires to eliminate the supply of internet with in Pakistan indefinitely ? :laugh:

Wonder why didn't that happen already when the technological capability is there :rofl:
 
Last edited:
.

Dissecting Pakistani Politics ft. Syed Muzammil Shah | Junaid Akram's Podcast​

 
.
as to your first point actions speak louder than words, if you instill such a fear that people cant even name you, and call you khalai makhlooqm, namaloom, muqtadar halqay anytime your unwanted involvement is suspected, you may not be verbally claiming but your actions claim that you are "yeh mulk hamara hai tum bloody civilians ho khaw makhaw is mein"

To your second point, as cmla it was yahya khans job to call the assembly to session, for all the kicking and screaming of bhutto. just like now, let the elections happen. provide security, do your job. if supposedly as claimed that fauj intervenes because politicians cant settle differences then that would have not been an intervention but a discharge of the duty as president/cmla.

Just a minor correction. Under the self-proclaimed Field Marshall Ayub Khan, pressure was building up between the East and the West, and he hand-picked Yahya Khan at the last minute to catch the falling knife. While Yahya Khan was a good soldier, he was no seasoned politician and only did what he knew in his capacity. Lesson: Sometimes a person needs to think, staring at the chair if it's the right time, power is enticing, but it can also be deadly to those sitting on it.

Ayub himself played the aurat religious card of Fatima, and he's on record, even in his book, being racist against the Bengalis. So one could say there was underlining racial tension, and rather than correcting course, they dug a deeper hole.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom