What's new

Future of Pakistan-Iran ties

Edevelop

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
23
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
Preventing the next regional conflict

Pakistan certainly seems to be passing through one of it toughest phases, with turmoil internally and in the neighbourhood. Since the dismemberment of the country in 1971, the region has gone through four decades of continuous warfare. This has included the Iranian Revolution of 1979, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran-Iraq War of the 80s, the Afghan civil war of the 90s, and the present phase that began since 9/11.

It appears more than a simple coincidence that two of Pakistan’s immediate neighbours to the west, Iran and Afghanistan, were invaded at about the same time. In any event, in both conflicts religion got interjected. The repercussions of this are still playing out in the region and beyond. There was also a concern that after Afghanistan, Pakistan might become the next victim of the dreaded Domino Theory. Moreover, US also wanted to check the religious influence emanating from Iran to spread any further. That apprehension continues to bedevil the region.

While a lot is heard about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, most accounts fail to mention the Iranian Revolution that started almost simultaneously. The Khomeini-led rebellion effectively transformed the nature of pro-American regime and this change has impacted the politics of the Islamic world to this day. Only a year later, in 1980, Iran-Iraq war commenced and lasted until 1988, almost up to the time when Soviets started to withdraw from Afghanistan.

During this phase, while Iran was moving out from the American influence, Pakistan was getting fully embedded into it. The nation helped facilitate the jihad against the Soviets with assistance of the Arabs and US. The role of Pakistan in the Iran-Iraq war, however, was based more on maintaining a delicate balance.

Pakistan went out of its way in helping to protect the Gulf states against the Iranian threat, and according to some estimates, Zia-ul-Haq placed close to 40,000 military personnel in Saudi Arabia for security and training purposes. This, however, did not occur at the cost of Iran. Reportedly, Pakistan also supplied weapons to Iran, and both neighbours supported the Afghan jihad, albeit different factions.

The global powers were playing a similar game. For example, while Russians were intermittently supplying weapons to Iraq, the Iran-Contra affair proved that US was also equipping the Iranians. Iraq had earlier broken relations with US over the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, which were not restored until 1986. Nonetheless, shady dealing had continued between Saddam and the US.

What ended the Iran-Iraq war, according to many analysts, was the increased volatility of the sea-lanes, plus a fear that Iran was beginning to have an upper hand in the conflict. This would have had reverberations throughout the Middle East, including Afghanistan and Pakistan.

While Saddam’s decision to invade Iran in 1980 is believed to be a miscalculation, he also feared that a strong religious Iran would disturb the Shia-Sunni balance of Iraq. Saddam repeated his misjudgment when he invaded Kuwait in August 1990, but was met with a different response than his earlier mistake. Ever since Iraq has come under American-led intervention twice, and despite all past attempts to contain Iran, its sway has grown. In the end, it was the US that disturbed the ethnic balance of Iraq and Afghanistan. And, at the same time, the fear of Iran has helped in moving the Arabs even closer to US and Pakistan.

In this sense, there is continuity in the western policy of both propping Iran’s influence, and at the same time preventing it from becoming a dominant power in the Middle East. In Afghanistan, this has translated into checking any single player, whether Iran or Pakistan, to overshadow. And, lately Indian influence has been introduced as a balancing factor.

This historical context only raises the importance of Pakistan-Iran ties. While US lost Iran in 1979, the importance of Pakistan has only increased. 1979 proved to be a crucial year as far as Pakistan’s relations with Iran are concerned. With the introduction of religion in both the Iranian Revolution and Afghan jihad, secularism took a backseat. To this date, the two events have transformed and divided the politics of the region and also resulted in the birth of Al-Qaeda.

Between the period of 1947 to 1971, Pakistan and Iran enjoyed very close ties. In both 1965 and 1971 wars against India, Iran supported Pakistan diplomatically, militarily and financially. The country also offered military equipment, training and intelligence to Pakistan in quashing the Baloch insurgency in mid 70s.

Now, almost a decade after 9/11, Pakistan-Iran ties stand at a crucial juncture, as do the US-Pakistan ties. President Obama’s reelection presents a hope that he may now take a different approach towards Iran. If an alternative route is indeed chosen, there is an opportunity for tremendous regional cooperation and economic boom, and the vision for the ‘New Silk Road’ can really blossom. There remain apprehensions that Russia and China may benefit more from this boom than the Europeans and the Americans.

However, if fear plays a major role, it would bring even more conflict and bust. The new sanctions connected to the Iran Freedom and Counter Proliferation Act (IFCPA) are expected to go into effect from July 2013. Under the provisions of this act, US would impose sanctions against any entity conducting energy, shipping and ship building dealings, and port operations with Iran. Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project and the development of Chabahar port are most likely to be impacted by the new sanctions.

Such acts will impede regional cooperation and will hurt the economies of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan. Moreover, they will challenge President Obama’s claim made during his inaugural address that ‘A decade of war is now ending,’ and that ‘We (Americans), the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war’.

As these choices loom on the horizon, Pakistan may end up invoking a paradigm it has consistently followed in its foreign policy; good ties with US should not be at the cost of friendly neighbours and elements.

Future of Pakistan-Iran ties | Pakistan Today | Latest news | Breaking news | Pakistan News | World news | Business | Sport and Multimedia
 
.
Preventing the next regional conflict

Pakistan certainly seems to be passing through one of it toughest phases, with turmoil internally and in the neighbourhood. Since the dismemberment of the country in 1971, the region has gone through four decades of continuous warfare. This has included the Iranian Revolution of 1979, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran-Iraq War of the 80s, the Afghan civil war of the 90s, and the present phase that began since 9/11.

It appears more than a simple coincidence that two of Pakistan’s immediate neighbours to the west, Iran and Afghanistan, were invaded at about the same time. In any event, in both conflicts religion got interjected. The repercussions of this are still playing out in the region and beyond. There was also a concern that after Afghanistan, Pakistan might become the next victim of the dreaded Domino Theory. Moreover, US also wanted to check the religious influence emanating from Iran to spread any further. That apprehension continues to bedevil the region.

While a lot is heard about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, most accounts fail to mention the Iranian Revolution that started almost simultaneously. The Khomeini-led rebellion effectively transformed the nature of pro-American regime and this change has impacted the politics of the Islamic world to this day. Only a year later, in 1980, Iran-Iraq war commenced and lasted until 1988, almost up to the time when Soviets started to withdraw from Afghanistan.

During this phase, while Iran was moving out from the American influence, Pakistan was getting fully embedded into it. The nation helped facilitate the jihad against the Soviets with assistance of the Arabs and US. The role of Pakistan in the Iran-Iraq war, however, was based more on maintaining a delicate balance.

Pakistan went out of its way in helping to protect the Gulf states against the Iranian threat, and according to some estimates, Zia-ul-Haq placed close to 40,000 military personnel in Saudi Arabia for security and training purposes. This, however, did not occur at the cost of Iran. Reportedly, Pakistan also supplied weapons to Iran, and both neighbours supported the Afghan jihad, albeit different factions.

The global powers were playing a similar game. For example, while Russians were intermittently supplying weapons to Iraq, the Iran-Contra affair proved that US was also equipping the Iranians. Iraq had earlier broken relations with US over the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, which were not restored until 1986. Nonetheless, shady dealing had continued between Saddam and the US.

What ended the Iran-Iraq war, according to many analysts, was the increased volatility of the sea-lanes, plus a fear that Iran was beginning to have an upper hand in the conflict. This would have had reverberations throughout the Middle East, including Afghanistan and Pakistan.

While Saddam’s decision to invade Iran in 1980 is believed to be a miscalculation, he also feared that a strong religious Iran would disturb the Shia-Sunni balance of Iraq. Saddam repeated his misjudgment when he invaded Kuwait in August 1990, but was met with a different response than his earlier mistake. Ever since Iraq has come under American-led intervention twice, and despite all past attempts to contain Iran, its sway has grown. In the end, it was the US that disturbed the ethnic balance of Iraq and Afghanistan. And, at the same time, the fear of Iran has helped in moving the Arabs even closer to US and Pakistan.

In this sense, there is continuity in the western policy of both propping Iran’s influence, and at the same time preventing it from becoming a dominant power in the Middle East. In Afghanistan, this has translated into checking any single player, whether Iran or Pakistan, to overshadow. And, lately Indian influence has been introduced as a balancing factor.

This historical context only raises the importance of Pakistan-Iran ties. While US lost Iran in 1979, the importance of Pakistan has only increased. 1979 proved to be a crucial year as far as Pakistan’s relations with Iran are concerned. With the introduction of religion in both the Iranian Revolution and Afghan jihad, secularism took a backseat. To this date, the two events have transformed and divided the politics of the region and also resulted in the birth of Al-Qaeda.

Between the period of 1947 to 1971, Pakistan and Iran enjoyed very close ties. In both 1965 and 1971 wars against India, Iran supported Pakistan diplomatically, militarily and financially. The country also offered military equipment, training and intelligence to Pakistan in quashing the Baloch insurgency in mid 70s.

Now, almost a decade after 9/11, Pakistan-Iran ties stand at a crucial juncture, as do the US-Pakistan ties. President Obama’s reelection presents a hope that he may now take a different approach towards Iran. If an alternative route is indeed chosen, there is an opportunity for tremendous regional cooperation and economic boom, and the vision for the ‘New Silk Road’ can really blossom. There remain apprehensions that Russia and China may benefit more from this boom than the Europeans and the Americans.

However, if fear plays a major role, it would bring even more conflict and bust. The new sanctions connected to the Iran Freedom and Counter Proliferation Act (IFCPA) are expected to go into effect from July 2013. Under the provisions of this act, US would impose sanctions against any entity conducting energy, shipping and ship building dealings, and port operations with Iran. Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project and the development of Chabahar port are most likely to be impacted by the new sanctions.

Such acts will impede regional cooperation and will hurt the economies of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan. Moreover, they will challenge President Obama’s claim made during his inaugural address that ‘A decade of war is now ending,’ and that ‘We (Americans), the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war’.

As these choices loom on the horizon, Pakistan may end up invoking a paradigm it has consistently followed in its foreign policy; good ties with US should not be at the cost of friendly neighbours and elements.

Future of Pakistan-Iran ties | Pakistan Today | Latest news | Breaking news | Pakistan News | World news | Business | Sport and Multimedia



Bunch of rehash of old stories. Good read. But that's all.


Iranian Ayatullahs have made "Murg ber Amreeka" as part of their religion. they chant it at least 5 times a day, every Jumma prayer and every Eid.


that leaves very little room for Iranians to agree to anything Americans are asking.

So for America, it is either accept Iran for what it is.

Or continue using gradually increasing pressure on Iran until the regime breaks down or gets overwhelmed by a military attack.

For Pakistani POV, I hope that moment never comes. We hate to see anything happening to Iranian civilians as to what happened to Afghanistani civilians, or Iraq Civilians, or what's happening to Syrian civilians.

Wars are a be-ach. Big bearded Ayatullahs go underground, only civilians remain to bear the brunt.


So I hope war never happens and Americans and Iranians come to some sort of understanding.


However if an when the war does happen,

Pakistan cannot do a doodoo to stop it or save it or support it.


The reason is geography.

Very little of Iranian population and industry lies close to Pakistani border. Instead most of it is concentrated towards Iran's Western side.


So Pakistan should not expect any major request from USA in this regard. Afghanistan was a different story. Again due to geography. Iran is different again due to geography.


And thus we should not worry too much as far as Pakistani state is concerned.

Pakistani civilians and Mullahs and its Shia population may make some noise, but that won't change the America-War picture on the ground.


peace
 
.
As these choices loom on the horizon, Pakistan may end up invoking a paradigm it has consistently followed in its foreign policy; good ties with US should not be at the cost of friendly neighbours and elements.

Alas US and her Wahabi allies are intent on insisting that good relations with the US come at the expense of good relations with Pakistan neighbors especially one with whom we share the deepest of heritages.
 
.
Sending troops to KSA wasn't entirely wrong seeing how dependent we have become on deferred payments for oil etc. This will continue until we find and develop new energy sources that can wean us off from GCC's oil supplies, saving countless foreign reserves and allowing us to form independent foreign policies.

Pak-Iran relations are important, there is no doubt. But the impending sanctions on Iran can not be ignored completely while we have yet to stand on our own feet without the need for our political leadership roaming around the world asking for money.
 
.
The future of Pakistan-Iran ties first depends on having a moderate and logical government on both ends but more importantly in Iran. We do not want their hand chopping and throat silting influences to pass into Pakistan!
 
.
We do not want their hand chopping and throat silting influences to pass into Pakistan!

It seems you fear that your friends might lose their hands! Is Mr. Ten Percent one of those friends?
 
.
Former USSR ambassador to Pakistan once presented General Zia-ul-Haq a small booklet and told him, 'Your Excellency, this is our foreign policy booklet, whether you read it now or 100 years in the future it will be the same". He was referring to their desire of reaching the warm waters of Indian Ocean.

A lot has happened since, there is the emergent Superpower China whose land strategy depends upon access to Iranian energy and Indian Ocean (not to mention encirclement of India) through Pakistan. A resurgent Russia which is appearing as an energy rich nation capable to reassert itself and follow it's foreign policy.

The trade appears to be at the heart of new geostrategy. There are pipelines taking Russian gas and oil to China and Europe and the cliche goes that you don't fight the people you do business with. Then, there is Indian desire to access oil and gas of Central Asian Republics (without passing through Pakistan) not forgetting that their (CAR's) foreign policies and resources are still largely under the control of Russian Oligarchy.

If Iran comes under US/NATO grip, obviously it's energy resources will be diverted to Quench the thirst of Europe. This will provide a blow to Russian economic and strategic concerns in Europe. Obviously, Russia will never want this to happen. In addition, the interests of China and India, two of Iran's big customers will also be affected.

There has to be a middle ground where everybody in the region is happy, that means Russia, China, India, Iran, Central Asia and Pakistan. Enter Chah Bahar and Gwadar!

It appears that after concluding US/NATO to be the biggest threat, Russia and China have reached a historic compromise and that emerges in the form of SCO and the sister ports of Chah Bahar and Gwadar.

With Chah Bahar Russia reaches the warm waters of Indian Ocean - once there is economic activity, the navy will follow to "protect the maritime interests". There is talk of building rail links to CAR which are connected to Russian hinterland.

India gets access to Iran, Afghanistan and CAR; India is also supposedly building a 900 Km rail link to Afghanistan from Chah Bahar.

For China, there is Gwadar around which, in the future, Chinese Navy (the aircraft carriers) will be conducting military exercises with Pakistani Navy.

The presence of all this economic (and military) activity will make Iran an important strategic energy link upon which the trade of many nations will depend and there will be diplomatic, financial and military help available from all sides.

The attack on Iran, in these conditions, seems most unlikely. It will disturb the whole status-quo which is so eagerly pursued by the regional powers. It will be vetoed in UN. Iran is not Syria, the nation is united against US/NATO hegemonic designs. Iranians are 'developing better military technology than Russia';). There is some on the show, some still hidden.

Then, there is Hezbollah in Lebanon, which is funded/trained by Iranians.

There is Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, which is funded by Iranians.

There is the new Shia government in Iraq which is full of Iranian sympathisers.

All of the above three pledge their spiritual allegiance to Iranian clergy.

In case of an all out attack from Israel of US/NATO, the whole region will be in flames with attacks on US/NATO/Israeli interests. Only if they are willing to play this gamble will the US/NATO/Israelis will attempt to attack Iran.

An alternative will be to create 2 opposing blocks of Muslims: Shia and Sunni and let them fight to death. The consolidation of Shia interests was done by US/NATO in Afghanistan and Iraq by creating ethnic violence. They have not been able to pull it off completely. In the end, Iranian turned out as victors.

Then, the Arabs are not willing to fight, they are happy with state of their states.

So, the Iranians are pretty secure; they know it and are playing along well.

Similarly, Pakistan does not face an existential threat after the possession of 'Our Nuclear Strategic Assets'. China is fully guaranteeing our sovereignty especially after Myanmar moved away from it and now we are it's only friendly and direct link to the Indian Ocean.

The area of conflict (and co-operation) which is soon likely to emerge is the power struggle in Post-US withdrawal Afghanistan with Iran again backing Shia Northern Alliance and Pakistan supporting Pashtun (should I say Taliban) which are also a majority in Afghanistan. I hope that both have learned enough from their past mistakes and can take positive steps to prevent any potential conflict i.e bringing moderate elements as ethnic representatives but that may proved to be a formidable task in the tribal Afghanistan.

Then, there is IPI or IPC gas pipeline - a need shared by all four neighbours. And in a foreseeable future the mediation of Pakistan (and Turkey) in bringing the Shia and Sunni states of Middle East on friendly terms, so that they could pool their resources for the betterment of the region.
 
.

It seems you fear that your friends might lose their hands! Is Mr. Ten Percent one of those friends?

Mr 10% is one of those Mullahs can never approach to chop hands off - tho i will be happy if they can even imagine to do so!
 
.
Future of Pakistan-Iran ties

By:Arif Ansar
27 Jan 2013

161.jpg


Pakistan certainly seems to be passing through one of it toughest phases, with turmoil internally and in the neighbourhood. Since the dismemberment of the country in 1971, the region has gone through four decades of continuous warfare. This has included the Iranian Revolution of 1979, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran-Iraq War of the 80s, the Afghan civil war of the 90s, and the present phase that began since 9/11.

It appears more than a simple coincidence that two of Pakistan’s immediate neighbours to the west, Iran and Afghanistan, were invaded at about the same time. In any event, in both conflicts religion got interjected. The repercussions of this are still playing out in the region and beyond. There was also a concern that after Afghanistan, Pakistan might become the next victim of the dreaded Domino Theory. Moreover, US also wanted to check the religious influence emanating from Iran to spread any further. That apprehension continues to bedevil the region.

While a lot is heard about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, most accounts fail to mention the Iranian Revolution that started almost simultaneously. The Khomeini-led rebellion effectively transformed the nature of pro-American regime and this change has impacted the politics of the Islamic world to this day. Only a year later, in 1980, Iran-Iraq war commenced and lasted until 1988, almost up to the time when Soviets started to withdraw from Afghanistan.

During this phase, while Iran was moving out from the American influence, Pakistan was getting fully embedded into it. The nation helped facilitate the jihad against the Soviets with assistance of the Arabs and US. The role of Pakistan in the Iran-Iraq war, however, was based more on maintaining a delicate balance.

Pakistan went out of its way in helping to protect the Gulf states against the Iranian threat, and according to some estimates, Zia-ul-Haq placed close to 40,000 military personnel in Saudi Arabia for security and training purposes. This, however, did not occur at the cost of Iran. Reportedly, Pakistan also supplied weapons to Iran, and both neighbours supported the Afghan jihad, albeit different factions.

The global powers were playing a similar game. For example, while Russians were intermittently supplying weapons to Iraq, the Iran-Contra affair proved that US was also equipping the Iranians. Iraq had earlier broken relations with US over the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, which were not restored until 1986. Nonetheless, shady dealing had continued between Saddam and the US.

What ended the Iran-Iraq war, according to many analysts, was the increased volatility of the sea-lanes, plus a fear that Iran was beginning to have an upper hand in the conflict. This would have had reverberations throughout the Middle East, including Afghanistan and Pakistan.

While Saddam’s decision to invade Iran in 1980 is believed to be a miscalculation, he also feared that a strong religious Iran would disturb the Shia-Sunni balance of Iraq. Saddam repeated his misjudgment when he invaded Kuwait in August 1990, but was met with a different response than his earlier mistake. Ever since Iraq has come under American-led intervention twice, and despite all past attempts to contain Iran, its sway has grown. In the end, it was the US that disturbed the ethnic balance of Iraq and Afghanistan. And, at the same time, the fear of Iran has helped in moving the Arabs even closer to US and Pakistan.

In this sense, there is continuity in the western policy of both propping Iran’s influence, and at the same time preventing it from becoming a dominant power in the Middle East. In Afghanistan, this has translated into checking any single player, whether Iran or Pakistan, to overshadow. And, lately Indian influence has been introduced as a balancing factor.

This historical context only raises the importance of Pakistan-Iran ties. While US lost Iran in 1979, the importance of Pakistan has only increased. 1979 proved to be a crucial year as far as Pakistan’s relations with Iran are concerned. With the introduction of religion in both the Iranian Revolution and Afghan jihad, secularism took a backseat. To this date, the two events have transformed and divided the politics of the region and also resulted in the birth of Al-Qaeda.

Between the period of 1947 to 1971, Pakistan and Iran enjoyed very close ties. In both 1965 and 1971 wars against India, Iran supported Pakistan diplomatically, militarily and financially. The country also offered military equipment, training and intelligence to Pakistan in quashing the Baloch insurgency in mid 70s.

Now, almost a decade after 9/11, Pakistan-Iran ties stand at a crucial juncture, as do the US-Pakistan ties. President Obama’s reelection presents a hope that he may now take a different approach towards Iran. If an alternative route is indeed chosen, there is an opportunity for tremendous regional cooperation and economic boom, and the vision for the ‘New Silk Road’ can really blossom. There remain apprehensions that Russia and China may benefit more from this boom than the Europeans and the Americans.

However, if fear plays a major role, it would bring even more conflict and bust. The new sanctions connected to the Iran Freedom and Counter Proliferation Act (IFCPA) are expected to go into effect from July 2013. Under the provisions of this act, US would impose sanctions against any entity conducting energy, shipping and ship building dealings, and port operations with Iran. Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project and the development of Chabahar port are most likely to be impacted by the new sanctions.

Such acts will impede regional cooperation and will hurt the economies of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan. Moreover, they will challenge President Obama’s claim made during his inaugural address that ‘A decade of war is now ending,’ and that ‘We (Americans), the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war’.

As these choices loom on the horizon, Pakistan may end up invoking a paradigm it has consistently followed in its foreign policy; good ties with US should not be at the cost of friendly neighbours and elements.

The writer is chief analyst at PoliTact, a Washington based futurist advisory firm (www.PoliTact.com and http:twitter.com/politact) and can be reached at aansar@politact.com

Future of Pakistan-Iran ties | Pakistan Today | Latest news | Breaking news | Pakistan News | World news | Business | Sport and Multimedia
 
.
Iranian mullahs in power and their self centric policy is the issue here.

Pakistanis cherish the days of SHAH times...I sincerely think Pakistan made a big mistake to donate Nuclear Technology to Iranians.
 
. .
Better relationship between Pakistan Iran is very important for this region.
 
.
The problem as I see it is Ayatuulah's expansionist dreams

I doubt Pakistan would ever have a problem with Iran; however the Iranian government since Khomeni's time has interests which are not in our favor.
 
.
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom