Donatello
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 10,531
- Reaction score
- 23
- Country
- Location
Because delays of the licence production, based on failures or mistakes from Dassaults side, would be responsibility of Dassault, not HAL's. If China delays the delivery of parts, or provides you with wrong ToT for JF 17s licence production, you don't blame PAC either or?
Since we have experience with such problems in the MKI or Hawk licence production, keeping Dassault committed to the whole production is a logical move, but this has nothing to do with responsibility as mentioned earlier.
Yes, Dassault should only be held responsible for it's part. Once the parts are shipped and HAL takes over the production process, then Dassault cannot be held responsible. And that is what Dassault needs to make sure, so that it's own interests are protected.